Some items in the TriCollege Libraries Digital Collections may be under copyright. Copyright information may be available in the Rights Status field listed in this item record (below). Ultimate responsibility for assessing copyright status and for securing any necessary permission rests exclusively with the user. Please see the Reproductions and Access page for more information.
GLIM, Spring 1996, volume 2
Swarthmore College student publications (1874 - 2013)
1996-04-01
reformatted digital
put, and connecting guides are designed to be single mode. Because the guides are deeply etched and the spacing
between single-mode guides is one guide width, crosstalk between the guides is neglected. Reflections in the longitu-
dinal direction and resonance within the MMI section are not considered.
In the optimization of these devices the two MMI section lengths and the phase shift values are considered to be
adjustable parameters. The final output intensity depends on several variables, and derivatives are not available to assist
convergence. A modified Powell method is therefore employed, in which the direction of largest decrease during the
previous iteration is discarded. The one dimensional directions selected with the Powell algorithm are optimized with
Brent’s method. Tolerances on all parameters can be adjusted to produced optimal parameters within specified error.
A. 2X2x1 CASCADED DEVICE OPTIMIZATION
The 2x2x1 cascaded device shown in Fig. 2 is modeled, where L1,2 are the lengths of the first and second MMI
regions, respectively, w is the width of both MMI regions, and g1,2 are the phase shifts in the interconnecting guides.
The simple 2x2x1 case is a three variable optimization problem in terms of the two lengths L1,2 and the difference
between the phase shifts 1 - 42 with w held constant. Because local maxima are sought in the optimization, approxi-
mations for the individual parameters from either approximation discussed in Theory can be used as seed values. The
small number of variables allows the generation of a surface of output intensity as a function of adjustable parameters;
the smoothness of the surface and location of maxima can therefore be observed. Only a single input guide (guide 1) is
excited, and by virtue of the symmetry, the response with an input to the other guide is identical.
1st MMI 2nd MMI
foligo t 2 { 8.0 pm
Rg | ra Ate UN a nea ety od
Fic. 2. 2X2xX1 CASCADED SWITCHING DEVICE WITH TWO INPUTS AT +2.0 UM FROM THE CENTER OF THE DEVICE.
To determine whether numerical techniques could be used to optimize the device design, the output intensity of the
device as a function of L1,2 is calculated with g1 - g2 held constant. One example surface is plotted in Fig. 3, where the
difference between the phase shifts is fixed at 1/2. The optimization surface is continuous with a single local maximum.
For a variety of fixed phase differences, surfaces with similar characteristics but lower peak intensity were generated (not
shown), so when all three parameters were varied, a unique local maximum remained. Therefore, numerical optimiza-
tion should be effective for this and similar models.
AM
bf
hy
a)
MER
SEES
FARK
Normalized Intensity
: \y
LEROY trees
ZEIT
ZESOIRN\\
fs RKB
LESAN
ERS
SERN
RO
Sees
110
Le (um)
Fic. 3. OPTIMIZATION SURFACE OF L1,2 FOR INPUT INTO GUIDE 1; PHASE SHIFTS ARE FIXED AT @1 - @2 = 1/2 FOR INPUT INTO GUIDE 2.
L1,2 and gl - g2 have been optimized with the Powell algorithm for maximum output power in the single output
guide. The width W of the multimode region was fxed so that the desired number of single-mode input guides, with
spacings equal to the guide widths, could be accommodated. A more general optimization which takes into account
variations in the widths and separations of the different guides and sections within the constraints of single mode input,
intermediate, and output guides, overall device length, etc. is an area of future work.
B. 2X2x1 DESIGN APPROXIMATIONS
Because simple approximations of the self-imaging lengths are often used in device design, a comparison of the per-
formance of devices with approximated lengths to that of devices with optimum lengths is shown in Table I. As men-
tioned above, these approximated lengths were used as seed values in the optimization. A comparison between two
vo
GLIM, Spring 1996, volume 2
Swarthmore College student publications (1874 - 2013)
1996-04-01
reformatted digital