FRIENDS’ ow aye ad REVIEW. A Religions, iterary and liscellancons Journal. ~ Von: Sve Seer EDITED BY SAMUEL RHOADS, To whom all Communications may be addressed. PUBLISHED WEEKLY, At No. 109 N. Tenth street, Philadelphia. ARAAAL Price, PAYABLE IN ADVANCE, Two dollars per annum, or six copies for Ten dollars. Postage on this paper, when paid quarterly or yearly in advance. 15 cents per annum in Pennsylvania, and 26 cents per annum in other States, For Friends’ Review. DAVID COOPER. The manuscript diary of David Cooper, con- taining much that is valuable, lies before me. de was born in 1724, and was grandson of Wm. Cooper, who came to New Jersey, from England, in 1678. He was a person of sound and strong mind and an influential, consistent Friend. A letter written by him to one of his fellow-mem- bers of the Meeting for Sufferings, eighty-five years ago, and some remarks respecting it, which he penned for the benefit of his children, ap- pear to me so pertinent to the present times, that I offer a insertion in the Review. ‘“‘ Woodbury, 15th of 6th month, 1777. ‘“ Dear Friend, received a hint from thee, implying that I had withdrawn from service in asking a release as a member of the Meeting for Sufferings. It hath since frequently come in my mind to give thee some of my reasons, which may remove censure if thou hast thought me deserving. Kew perhaps have seen more than myself the want of wise and faithful laborers, ata time when darkness appears to cover the land, and gross darkness the people, and I have greatly desired an inerease of the number who might be favored with sufficient light to distin- guish thing from thing, and to know when to move and when to stand still; and not, like men groping in this darkness, believe they are serving God, whew they are actuated only by outward views and conclusions as men, as it ap- pears the good king Josiah did when he opposed Pharoah in his own will,—which proved his de- struction. The exercise I have felt at times within three PHILADELPHIA, THIRD MONTH 15, 1862. No. 28, years, is not to be expressed, from beholding a mixture of human policy so manifest in the de- liberations of that meeting; Friends declaring — to the world that we are redeemed from it, and at the same time constantly meddling with it, as though we did not believe in or were not willing to trust to a superintending Provid appearing to think ourselvesand the conclusions of that meeting of abundantly greater consequence than any body else thinksthem. Thou wilt per- haps say these proceedings arose from a clear sense of duty. Possibly they may,—but if free from much mixture, I am sure one so mistaken and insersible as I have been was not a suitable member. nO * The compass of a letter will not admit giving my reasons fully for saying policy hath mixed in our deliberations; but, itdid not require much discerning to discover that our Testimony, pub- lished Ist mo., 1775, was first drawn up with a view to please at St. James’ as much if not more than to be useful in America. — Is this treason ? It was my real sentiment at the time and ever since: witness: ‘The king having been our nursing father’—and other parts which were _|expunged ; as also expressions frequently used, then and since, urging the great care necessary — not to displease these rulers over the water,— that our conduct as a Society would hereafter be - narrowly inspected by them, &c. And every line of it, almost, appeared to me to be dictated from human views, instead of that unerring Spirit — we profess to be guided by, which indeed sees not as man sees. A step which will, I believe, be thought illy to comport with this. principle of ours, should Providence permit the establish- ment of the separation for which the people are now struggling, and with which I am clear we had no business to interfere or meddle; but we should have realized our profession by leaving these things wholly to Him who needs not our . assistance in setting up or pulling down. But this is digressing from my first view of giving reasons for my release as above, and I may say, these meetings occasioned deep auffer- ings to me ; sometimes from a humbling fear lest I was exceedingly in the dark, in, that the feel- ings of my mind were so different from some of 434 my friends, and their spirits so set against me, which I was very sensible of. And once, when much had been said of false brethren, the text was applied, ‘ our worst enemies are those of our own house;’ after meeting I was informed it was made a matter of boast that D. C. had such a drubbing given him. However, it neither soured nor discouraged me, but I seemed to have greater strength to discharge what ap- peared for me'to doin these meetings. Thus it continued until the adjournment on Second-day, at last Spring Meeting, when almost as soon as [ sat down an unusual solemnity covered my mind, and the command to avoid improper mix- tures in seed and apparel occurred, and that the same prohibition nearly concerned us now, that we suffer not our hearts to be filled with re- ligion and politics, like the mingled seed, nor clothed with zeal of an improper mixture ; that there was no way to avoid this but by keeping the eye single tothe unerring guide, &c. Thou mayest remember I dropped some hints of this kind, in as few words as I well could, and I sat, for the most part, the rest df the meeting in great sweetness and quietude of mind, in which I thought I never saw a greater degree of this mixture than‘in the deliberations of that day. And though there appeared opportunities of making divers pertinent observations, the con- cern and weight seemed removed, and from the prospect I then had, I believed myself released |. from the service, and that it would be right, on the first opportunity, to appoint anotber in my stead, in which I have since been much con- firmed. And now, my friend, the foregoing may possi- bly discover that my blindness and stupidity rendered, me unfit for so important a trust. However, be assured, I thought myself released bya superior authority, before I asked it of my brethren, or I dare not have done it. But this lessens not my concern and care for the body (our proper business) according to my measure, and even for that meeting I feel a sincere desire that the members may be so wisely directed, that whatever they publish or give forth may carry an evidence that it came from Jesus, then will their weight and authority increase, which, since these troubles, have greatly diminished. And let me say, I have long believed the weight thou bears there renders caution necessary, lest the dignity and influencethy Master hath given thee, should be misapplied. Before I conclude, let me ask, from whence proceeds the deep-rooted prejudice, sourness and even bitterness so frequently to be discovered by expressions from our friends against the directors of the American measures. Certainly not from Him who commanded to love enemies. We read the archangel dared not rail at even Satan, and we say we cannot use violence, nor resist evil, because Christ hath forbidden it. Words cut deeper than swords. Can we suppose FRIENDS’ REVIEW. he forbade the effects and allowed the cause? Enmity is the cause of all violence. It is that which draws the sword. I would to God we were all as careful to keep the one out of our hearts asthe other out of our hands. Then would our conduct in every part demonstrate to the world that we were indeed his lambs, and trusted in Him alone, having no expectation from any outward help. And, when this comes to be enough the case, perhaps this boisterous sea may afford a way where there was no way. With ardent desires that thou and I may in all our religious movements act under the influ- ence of that Wisdom that never erred, I rest in near affection thy real friend. Dz.” If the request of David Ceaper, to be re- leased from his position in the Meeting for Suf- ferings, was complied with, (as is probable, be was soon reinstated, as appears from his journal. Some further remarks under date of 1783, have during the past 18 years frequently impressed me, almost as being history in the form of prophecy. The enlightened coneern which it evinces in view of the dangerous ten- dency to centralization of power in select bodies, was not inconsistent with a high regard for the individuals composing them. That danger, which for a while received a check, and which is restrained just in proportion as the leading minds in the Church truly dwell in the meek- ness and gentleness of Christ, exists at the present moment toa sufficient extent to war- rant the revival of the caution contained in the following extract from the Journal referred to above. ‘ “Fourth month, 1783. I am free to make a few remarks on this meeting [for Sufferings] which you, my children, may live to see if well founded. It is now about twenty-five years since the institution of it, and it ‘consisted: of twelve members appointed by the Yearly Meet- ing, and four by each Quarter. In the whole, thirty-six. There have since been two more quarters added, making the standing members forty-four. I was one of the first four appointed by our Quarter, and have been a member chief of the time since, and have had an opportunity to observe the increasing importance of that meeting, which, though called a meeting, is but a standing committee of the Yearly Meeting. And itis a truth which ought never to be lost sight of, that whenever a subordinate body becomes too important, either from thew numbers or the weight of the members, they nat- urally engross a power and consequence, beyond the limits intended them: and thus grow, more or less, out of the reach of that control, the superior body ought strenuously to marntam. This, if I am not mistaken, hath already ap- peared too much the case with that meeting, and this I fear will increase with time. — Their name implies their business—‘ Meeting for FRIENDS’ REVIEW. 435 Sufferings.’ But many other matters of great consequence to Society are considered and de- bated there, even matters of faith have fre- quently been the subject of their deliberations, and whatever is there agreed upon, their weight is greatly suffivient to get confirmed by the Yearly Meeting. From which I am firmly of the judgment, that were the number much less, it would answer every end originally intended, and, by increasing caution, render the institu- tion more salutary to Society. But the very reverse of this hath taken place. For, in the beginning of the late commotions, this meeting, by greatly over-rating their own consequence, found themselves embarrassed by much censure which their proceedings had drawn on them from their brethren. Application was then made to the Yearly, Meeting to direct an addi- tion of four members from each Quarter, to be called assistant members, and convened on ex- traordinary occasions ; ‘whereby that meeting now consists of seventy-six members. Judge then if the Yearly Meeting can possibly pre- serve that effectual control over the proceedings of such a body, (made up of the most active, weighty members belonging to it) which the peace and good of society seem to require. This the secrets of time must disclose. Of the like nature is the consequence the meeting of ministers and elders has become in Society, and the effects"it may in future produce, appear tome more deep and serious than the foregoing. These members, when mixed up with their brethren, have a principal share in conducting the affairs of meetings, (from the Yearly to the Preparative), and when they are collected in a select capacity, the remainder of the Yearly Meeting is by no means a balance for them. From this no inconvenience could arise, were they to consider themselves only as standing, committees, and confine themselves strictly to the service for which they were originally appointed, which was, to help and watch over the ministry. But they often meddle with other matters, of which many instances might be mentioned ; and assume the appellation of The Yearly Meeting, alleging that the Yearly Meeting begins on Seventh-day when that meet- Ing sits, whereas it is fixed to begin on the fourth First-day in the Ninth month, whichis the next day. And they have had influence sufficient to cause the epistles and extracts to bear date from Seventh-day, contrary to the practice of Friends in London, who date theirs from Second-day, when business begins: and the contrary is pub- lishing an untruth, thus, for our extracts to say: ‘The extracts from the minutes of our Yearly Meeting held by adjournments from” (Seventh- day to the end) when the adjournments of the meeting from which those minutes were ex- tracted, did not commence until two days after.* *This error: has been corrected. The fact that it existed shows the need of David Cooper's caution. What end this innovation is to answer (or can) I know not, except to increase the importance of that meeting. For, however strange it may appear, it is no unusual topic, to hear it insisted _ upon that that meeting is the superior one: that when a part is ‘select, it is superior to the whole when united. Itis clear tome, the Yearly Meeting, in the establishment of that meeting, never expected or intended such numbers of Elders to be appointed, as, from the only minute of its institution in 1714 will appear. ‘This meeting agrees that the Quarterly Meetings do recommend to each Monthly Meeting within their respective limits, that they choose two or more Friends out of each Monthly Meeting (where meetings of ministers are or shall be held; to sit with the ministers in their meetings taking care that the Friends chosen for that service be prudent, solid Friends, and that they | do,carefully discharge their trust, in such mat- ters and in such manner as the Monthly Meet- ings shall from time’to time see occasion to ap- point them.’ : I wish not to depreciate the services of these meetings, being myself a member of them both, —but that they may be strictly kept to the ser- vices, and within the limits their institution in- tended; being fully convinced of the truth (without exception) of the observation, that in every human society there is an effort continually tending to increase the power and authority of the leaders and rulers. However secure we as a Society may think ourselves, Church History will abundantly show the fatal effects of en- trusting to select bodies a power out of the reach and control of the Body at large. I mean not to go into particulars; only to leave a few hints, to put in mind that ministers and elders are but men, subject to like passions with others, and as open to a degeneracy as the suc- cessors to the Apostles, when the foremost among the Christians claimed, and from step to step engrossed, the power of governing con- science, until at length it centered in one man, whose rules and decrees were accounted infalli- ble, and were blindly submitted unto. And though there appears no danger of Christians ever becoming so grossly and generally blinded again, yet the same effects, in degree, are ob- vious in most (if not all) Christian Societies at this day, of entrusting more to a select few in religious matters, than is conducive to health and soundness. And there remains not the - least doubt with me, that, should the weight and importance of these select Bodies increase as it has done for years past, it must, in some future day; bring on a change in the outward economy of the Society.” ' . David Cooper contiptied to maintain his place in the body as “an elder worthy of douple honor,” acting towards the flock as a tender father, with faithfulness and in much love, whilst humbly watchful over himself. He died 11th 436 FRIENDS’ REVIEW. mo. 5th, 1795, in his 71st year. It is possible that further extracts from his diary may, at some future time, be offered ‘to the readers of the Review. W. J. As For Friends’ Review. PERFECTION, FAITH, AND SALVATION. The following testimony sets forth with much clearness the Scriptural doctrine of Perfection, as held in the Society of Friends from earliest times ; and it is also valuable as showing the conviction of early Friends that repentance to- ward God must be followed by faith in our Lord Jesus, which they realized as the beginning of conversion and as containing in itself salvation, ere there could be any true denying of ungodli- ness, and walking acceptably before Him. William Smith is several times mentioned by George Fox, who made his home with him when he came intv Nottinghamshire. On one ocea- sion, in 1666, he found him * very weak and sick, and the constables had seized all his goods, to the very bed he lay upon, for truth’s sake,’ &c. The extract which follows is from an old folio copy of his works in Friends’ Li- brary, Philadelphia. e “This is the man that is after God, [he] who is regenerated by the power of God and born of the seed of God, which seed is Christ, the wis- dom and righteousness of God. And as He is in himself, so He is made the same to all that are born of Him; the man with His virtue be- comes clothed, and is holy as He is holy. Oh how many entertain their enemy in their house, how do they harbor him, and lodge him, and every way seek to please him, as the most worthy guest, but the best friend may stand and knock, and not a door open to Jet Him in. We believe that with God all things are pos- stble, and we also believe that whosoever are born of God do not commit sin, but are perfect as the heavenly Father is perfect, whose chil- dren they are ; and we believe that such a state is attainable in this life, whilst in the body, There is a state, whilst the birth is in travail, as that temptations may at sometimes prevail, for in that state the birth is not come into full strength through the growth of faith and so may sin through weakness; but where it is so, there is acry goes unto God to be delivered, and though there may be such an overcoming in weakness as that sin may have some power, yet that which cries to God in the sense of sin, it hath an advocate with the Father, even Jesus Christ the righteous; and He is the propitiation by whom the atonement is made, and through whom the sin is pardoned and remitted ; and so the birth grows stronger.in the faith, and goes on from one degree to another, until it be made perfect in Christ Jesus. We have life before we have motion to act, or to do anything that is pleasing unto God; and in the life we have salvation. Life and salva. tion are freely given us of God, and i grace we are saved, through our faith which we have in him, and that puts us upon motion and action to do his will in all things, and yet not to depend upon what we do for life, but to an. swer his will in all faithfulness because he hath given us life. And so we do not act or do any. thing for life; but do all things which he com. mands us from the motion of his life; and this is life before action, which moves us to action, and not action before life, thereby to attain to life. And so we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them ;— and this is ordained of God to be the fruit of our life and faith. And in these good works we walk, to His glory, and depend on Him alone fur the renewing of our strength to con- tinue in them unto the end. 2 Re WitiiaM Smita. Nottingham county Gaol, 1664.2 From the British Friend. SELF-DENIAL IN FIRST-DAY SCHOOL TEACHING. Dear Friend,—Perhaps thou wilt kindly allow me to make a few remarks upon the letter signed B. E. H. which appeared in thy last number. a ae The writer of that letter seems unwilling to accept theevidence in favor of increased spiritual vitality in our Society, afforded, in the opinion of a previous correspondent, by the large num- ber of young people engaged io First-day schéo! teaching. He inquires whether all, or nearly all, the young people so engaged can honestly regard the work as an act of “self-denial and cross-bearing ;”’ fears that many inducements other than those arising from love to Christ are found “sufficient ;”’ and instances the case of a young Friend who felt it an act of “ self-denial” to relinquish her postasateacher, = Questions of interest and importance are thus raised, with regard to which I venture to differ from thy correspondent B. E.H. In the first place, I think that he uses the ex- pression ‘ self-denial ’’ without sufficient pre- cision. Whatis the true nature of Christian “self-denial ?” The denial, surely, of the cor- rupt inclinations of the unrenewed heart, for Christ’s sake, and in view of that higher good in which our true happiness is seen to consist. It is the losing of the life of sin, and the finding of the spiritual life. In the present condition of the world, Christian self-denial will also often involve the abandonmentof many things in them- selves lawful, but which are now inconsistent with an entire devotion to Christ. But itis 4 great mistake to suppose that our Lord is such a hard master as to connect with no feeling of pleasure, and to surround with no ei nc of interest and enjoyment, the service 466 were most interesting illustrations of Christian festivity, and thoroughly in unison with the tone of his mind—unswerving in his own course, but entirely catholic in relation to his fellow- Christians. His great aim being the glory of God, by the exaltation of the Redeenier’s name, he found no obstruction, from any preconceived path of his own, to unity with others whom he recognised as pursuing the same great object, whether in his own Society, or in other sections of the Church of Christ. As he lived—so he died. The gradual change from active exertion to total inability was just such as is described in the well-known lines,— “ Sinks to the grave with unperceived decay, While resignation gently slopes the way ;” the same quiet unruffled cheerfulness, and simi- lar, though deep-toned words of comfort or warn- ing, uttered “ in season” to his family or friends. The clearness of his memory was noticeable, when, 1 such occasions, he would enforce what was before his mind, by correct and sometimes long quotations from the sacred volume. On the last anniversary of the Bible Meeting he was confined to his room, but was able to en- joy the visits of some friends of the cause which was so near to his heart. ‘“ I mentioned to him,” (says one of these in a letter to one of his daughters), ‘‘ the expression of an excellent man who, some months before his departure, said in answer to an inquiry,—‘ I am not afraid to die, but I am afraid ¢o live’”—(lest he should lose those hallowed impressions). On hearing this, your father added, ‘ But I am not afraid to die or to live!’ On one occasion in the earlier part of his painful illness, speaking of the mercies of his Heavenly Father, he added, “ It is such a com- fort to feel that all is ordered by Him. I feel as if I could live years even in this state if it be His will.” Several times he repeated 1 Thess. y. 16 to 24 ; evidently wishing to impress this Scripture upon his family. Looking out into the fields he remarked, “How much they begin to look like harvest. The Lord be praised! How good it is to re- ceive every blessing as coming from His hand ; I like to speak well of His name,—to be cheerful when I can.” Often he spoke of the mercy of God in Christ Jesus, saying it was all mercy; he had nothing to trust to but that. ‘As with the joy of harvest,” was his spirit gathered into the heavenly garner. Not long had the harvest been reaped from those beauti- ful fields surrounding his earthly home, ere friends, neighbors, and villagers, assembled mournfully under the bright autumn sun, and many a tearful eye and sorrowing heart followed the train which bore his long-known form to the grave ;—“ even as a shock of corn cometh in, in his season ;’’ many too, however various their FRIENDS’ REVIEW. shades of opinion on earth, unitir hope of the Christian, that as “ Jes rose again, even so them also wh Jesus will God bring with | i Monitor. For Friends’ Review. NOTICES OF DAVID COOPER. a It is possible to indulge too much in the ten- dency to “ backward loo ing,” and, y relling too exclusively in the contemplation of the times and the deeds of long departed worthies, to ig- nore the important fact that our par is to in the living present.” Yet ana cient prop declared :—‘ The righteous shall’ be in ever- lasting remembrance ;’—and it is doubtless profitable sometimes to dig out from the debris of past generations memorials of the qualifying power of divine grace, and evidences that this has been sufficient, from age to age, under trials and temptations similar to those of our own day, to make the steadfast disciple more than con- queror, through the Captain of Salvation. _ In a former number of the Review some re- markuble passages were given from the diary of David Cooper. The readers of this valuable periodical may be willing to know something of his character, »and of his successive stages of growth, to the full stature of a man in Christ Jesus. Vay ROP UIR TR Gh His great grandfather, William veer progenitor, probably, of hundreds of the read- ers of the Review) was born in 1632. He was married at about the age of 28 years, and soon after he and his wife, from religious conviction, associated themselves with that earnest body of Christians whose faith had just been intensified by the martyrdom of Mary , and in whose hosts of living witnesses to the divine power were still included, George Fox, Isaac Pening- ton, William Penn, Edward Burroughs, Robert Barclay, and many others; comprising and noble band, whose virtues we may profi bly contemplate, and whose fuith we should \ well to follow. He was a resident of Coleshill, Hertfordshire, England, where he became a min- ister of the gospel; and on his removal in 1678 to New Jersey, his Monthly tia, tified, “that the said William Cooper, and Mar- garet his wife, having lived in these parts for many years, ever since the first of their con- vincement, have walked conscientiously and hon- estly amongst us, agreeably to the profession and testimony of truth.” te After a brief tarriance at Burlingt settled at “ Pine Point,” opposite 1 which was soon to be the scene ‘Where a conquest was gained withor blood eM ke eae And the savage bowed down to the sage. William Cooper’s name is found appe nded tothe testimonies i ; Geors ‘is ued by the rane: t George Keith, iss FRIENDS? meeting of ministers, and by the Yearly Meet- ing. He worshipped for nearly thirty years in the meeting which was within our own memory favored with the ministry of that Boanerges, Richard Jordan; and his Monthly Meeting in , memorial issued after his death testifies : “He lived here in a godly conversation, exercising his gift in the meeting at Newton, to the bene- fit of God’s people, until it pleased God to re- move him. He died the 11th of First month, 1710, and was buried in Newton, in the County of Gloucester, in New Jersey aforesaid, being of a good old age, viz., in the latter end of his 78tb year. As he lived, so he died, in unity with Friends, and in fall assurance of his eternal well- being.” His children, William, Joseph, Daniel and Hannah, emigrated with him from Amersham Parrish, Hertfordshire. John Cooper, father of the subject of this memoir, was son of the last named William. George Fox, we may con- clude, was personally known to the first named William Cooper, both in Englandand America, and also in this country to his eldest son, whose grandson, DAviD Cooper, may have had his mind early imbued with traditions of those days of hallowed interest. The autograph diary from which it is pro- posed to make some extracts, is inscribed in its author’s handwriting : “ The gift of David Cooper to his daughter Martha Allinson.” The genea- logical details might have been omitted, but for the number of persons throughout our land who will recognise traces of their ancestry. The manuscript has the following caption: “ Some memoirs of David Cooper; intended for the use of his children,” and thus commences : “My DEAR CHILDREN:—My state of health for upwards of sixteen years hath been such as to give little reason to expect my stay here would be of long continuance; nevertheless, I still survive. But my feeble health and season of life now render it certain that the period can- not be very remote, when my body must return to dust, and my soul to Him who gave it. My care for you must then cease; but your Heav- enly Father, who can do all things for you, can never be removed, and if you are so wise as to obtain him for your counsellor and chief friend, the loss of your natural parent will be of small moment. ‘That this may be your experience is what I most earnestly desire, nor can I show greater love than by endeavoring to promote in you the same engagement. To this end it has, tor several years, often come into my mind to leave some account of the merciful care of Di- vine Goodness over me through life, for your perusal when I am gone. But a retrospect of my obscure station, and the few occurrences in ny experience worthy to be recorded, occasioned ine to resist the thought as often as it occurred. But latterly it hath frequently returned in a manner which hath led me to believe there REVIEW. 467 might be some things in it worth attending to. T have therefore now in the 6th month , 1776, (in the 52d year of my age.) entered upon it; and as it is only for your view, I shall not be very curious, either in the manner or matter. My materials being scanty, I shall, perhaps, note things for your information, satisfaction, and instruction, which may have little to recommend a but as they are the effects of a father’s ove. x I was born the 18th of 12th month (0. 8.) 1724. My father was John Cooper, grandson to William Cooper, who came from England in the year 1678, with his wife Margaret, and his children, William, Joseph, Daniel, and Hannah. They settled at the mouth of the stream named after him ‘‘ Cooper’s crerk.” His son Wil- liam had three children—my father, and two daughters,—viz., Mary (who married Benjamin Thackery,) and Hannah, wife to John Mickle. The first Friends’ Meeting in Gloucester County, [including the present Counties of Gloucester and Camden, | was held at his house, and was at- tended by some families on the opposite side of the river, about Frankfort—it being about four years before Philadelphia was laid out (which was in the year 1682.) My mother was Ann, daughter of Benjamin Clark, of Stoney Brook, who, being an only child, came over with his father of the same name from London into Hast Jersey among some of the first settlers. His father built the first house where Amboy now stands, and which, a few years past, I had the curiosity to go and see. It was then a reputable firm old building. He was a printer and sta- tioner of large business in London ; but printing Friends’ books without their being licensed, contrary to a law which had obtained in those arbitrary times, he found it necessary, to avoid rosecution, not to be seen in public for years. He therefore preferred a howling wilderness to the downy bed of affluence in such circum- stances. Being settled at Amboy, the inexpe- rienced farmer soon squandered away a large es- tate, and left his son poor—who, soon after his marriage, bought a thousand acres of land at Stoney Brook ire same that Jona [query, Jonah or Jonathan] Thomson claimed) and settled upon it; where my mother and_her sister Elizabeth (his two eldest children) assisted in clearing that fine farm where his ndson Benjamin Clark now lives. ‘My father died on his birthday, 22d of 9th mo., 1730, aged 47 years. My mother deceased 1+ th of 12th month, 1766, aged 75 years and 8 months. They lived in marriage 17 years, 9 months and . When I was young I was extremely bashful, so that I hardly could speak to or look a stranger in the face—but was much addicted to play and mirth. At school I had few equals at my book or at mischief—and being a general favorite never remember receiving more than 468 FRIENDS’ REVIEW. one stroke from a master. But even when very young I experienced two spirits at strife in me ; the one at times occasioned sadness and sorrow, and made me seek to be alone and weep; the other endeavoring to persuade me that none of my play-fellows were like me, nor indeed any one else in the world; that others were lively and merry and I was better than they—that there was no occasion for me to be uneasy for any thing I did, Thus did these struggles continue when alone, often shewing me my folly, which would tender me into tears, and induce me to make covenant that | would be more careful. But when with my companions, my propensity to mirth and folly increased with my years, and one thing, though small in itself, I think worth noting.” Here follows an account of a temptation which, through yielding to youthful vanity, induced him to violate the principle of simplicity in dress in which he had been trained. He was then 14 years of age, and the death of bis father bad left him comparatively without restraint, But wisely listening to the inward monitor, he was brought to consider the grief into which such libertinism would introduce his mother, and to consider the good examples of other youths whose plain attire now appeared to him be- coming a religious profession. ‘ Thus,” he notes, in grateful commemoration, ‘ did the di- vine hand keep near and preserve me out of gross things, in a manner that has since often caused my admiration, and reverent thankful- ness, that when I had no outward father to watch over me, and when I was rushing into folly as a horse into the battle, his secret hand preserved me, in a good degree, innocent from the pollu- tions of the world.” He also notes with thank- fulness that at a time when the use of ardent =. was customary, he was never overcome ereby ; also his caution never to give improper latitude to his tongue. “ As I advanced in age,” he continues, “ my religious profession was a great preservation to me; being less thoughtful of my own repu- tation than fearful to de anything that should cast a reproach on my friends, and the Society with which I was in membership. In company this was a great check. Thus by divine mercy was I preserved from gross enormities; so that the season of life being considered, and my sit- uation (without paternal restraint) 1 might pass for an innocent youth.” His conformity thus far to the standard of duty which had been made known to him, was productive of peace when, in his 19th year, he was extremely ill with apparent symptoms of death upon him, so that the neighbors were called in the night to see him die. ‘‘ My mother, broth- ers, and sisters were standing beside me ex- pone every breath to be my last. My eldest ther being overcome with grief, I desired him not to grieve for me, saying that! was not afraid to die. Thus I lay exceedingly quiet, wi mind stayed upon and resigned to th Providence, perceiving, as | thought, m be expiring ; my consciousness was, for time, entirely suspended,—when the dis turned, and I recovered.” ae (To be continued.) _—_—_— * For Friends’ Review. CONFERENCES OF FRIENI In a recent number of the Reviey an article on “ Conferences of Friends, W. C., which seems to require some ¢ There can be but one opinion amongst. ids as to the doctrine of the perceptible influence of the Holy Spirit. Closely connected therewith is our manner of conducting our Religious Meet- ings, in which all who speak, profess to speak under the pressure of religious exercise. In managing the affairs of the Church in meetings for discipline, Friends recognise the headship of Christ over his people ; whom he has bought with his own precious blood, and to whom he has promised to be head over all things. In all that relates to the body, which comes before such disciplinary meetings, those who take partition d do so in great watchfulness and under a sense of religious obligation; and where such is the case, all things are done decently and in order, and are marked by love, condescension and final harmony. 2 a Eat We cannot, however, assent to the view that Friends may not meet together in Conference on subjects of mutual interest, properly and profit- ably, unless they place upon their proceedings the stamp of a religious or disciplinary meeting. On the contrary, we believe such Conferences had better nat endeavor to claim any such special authority as this view would indicate. They are meetings for conference—meetings to interchange views— meetings to encourage those who are mutually engaged and interested in the same cause; neither meetings for worship, nor meetings for discipline. We trust that each Friend who takes part in such conferences, does so in view of his individual responsibility; but as no one with sane mind could object to use lawful appliances to facilitate his temporal business, observing in its general conduct the limitations of truth, so it is hard to see why such conferences may not very properly facili- tate the purpose of their convocation by the adop- tion of such rules as may best conduce to that end. Its decisions are of no authority beyond their own weight, nor are they intended to be. Some order must be preserved, that all who desire may have an opportunity to express their views; not as ministers of the Gospel—not as Disciplinarians, but simply as those who love the work would speak to other lovers of the same. ay There can be no departure fro 472 FRIENDS’ REVIEW. interpreters of nature? It is as the interpreter Of man, the interpreter of man’s records, that man stands distinguished. Herein reason tran- scends instinct, that its gifts are transmissive and cumulative. Mind does not stand supported by the mind which exists around it, not simply, not mainly. There is a higher and broadersupport. The minds of the great of bygone ages live and work in the breasts of their successors. The old Greeks, I suppose, knew this, and embodied it in the fable of Athene, the goddess of knowledge, who sprang into existence not as a naked, helpless child, but as a grown-up being, clad in complete armor, from the head of Zeus. THE MUSTARD-SEED PLANT OF PALESTINE. In the parable of the mustard-seed, it is said that this seed, although the smallest of all seeds when cast into the earth, becomes, when grown up, @ great tree (in a comparative sense, of course), and puts forth branches, so that the fowls of heaven come and lodge among them. I was beginning to fear that I should leave the country without having an opportunity to see any example of this plant answering to the de- scription of it in the parable. Of the various persons of whom I had made inquiry at Jeru- salem, no one was able to give me any certain information. One said that probably this species of the plant was now ‘extinct. Another said that it was reputed to grow very large in Gali- lee, but he could not vouch for it from personal observation. I had observed, indeed, in crossing the plain of Esdraelon, just before coming to Nazareth, that the mustard-plant was by no means uncommon there; but yet, though some of the stalks which I took pains to measure were quite large, they were still not so large as I had expected to find them, and not large enough, as it appeared to me, to suggest naturally the il- lustration in the parable. I was, therefore, dis- appointed. Some days after this, as I was riding across the plain of Akka, on the way to Carmel, I per- ceived, at some distance from the path, what seemed to be a little forest or nursery of trees. I turned aside to examine them. On coming nearer, they proved to be an extensive field of the plant which I was so anxious to see. It was then in blossom, full grown, in some cases six, seven, and nine feet high, with a stem or trunk an inch or more in thickness, throwing out branches on every side. I was now satisfied in part. I felt that such a plant might well be called a tree, and, in comparison with the seed producing it, a great tree. But still the branches, or stems of the branches, were not very large, or, apparently, very strong. Can the birds, I said to myself, rest upon them? Are they not tooslight and flexible? Will they not bend or break beneath the superadded weight ? At that very instant, as I stood and revolved the thought, lo! one of the fowls: of of heaven stopped in its flight through the air, alighted down on one of the branches, which hardly moved beneath the shock, and then be- gan, perched there before my eyes, to warble forth a strain of the richest music. All my doubts were now charmed away. I was delighted at the incident. It seemed to me at the moment as if | enjoyed enough to repay me for I trouble of the whole journey. iets Such incidental illustrations of Serip nish no small share of the gratification 3 the traveller receives from da : wanders through the lands of the Bible. finds that he ‘has a local commentary spre everywhere around him, which brings home to him the language and scenes of the Bible with a freshness and power which no learning or skill of commentators can supply. Iam aware that some give to the original word for “ mustard” a generic sense, so as to understand a tree, properly so called. But, as no necessity demands such an extension of the term, it is more correct to adhere to the ordinary meaning. Besides, the Evangelists include the mustard-plant of which they speak among herbs or vegetables, and thus indicate that when they call it a “tree” they make use of a popular hyperbole.— Hackett. . FRIENDS’ ——-— REVIEW. _ PHILADELPHIA, THIRD MO. 29, 1862. Notices or DAvID Cooper.—We commence, this week, the publication of a series of extracts from the Diary of David Cooper, prepared by a valued correspondent, and promising to possess much interest with reference to the early his- tory of New Jersey, and to the condition of our religious Society during a period of great diff culty and trial arising from political events. — We trust that the letter and remarks of David Cooper respecting the Meeting for Sufferings and the Yearly Meeting of Ministers and Elders, in this city, published in the Review two weeks since, have received the serious con- sideration of many of our readers; and if any have overlooked them, we would call their atten- tion to a careful perusal. They contain import- ant principles and suggestions which are singu- larly pertinent to the action of those meetings for several years past, and to the efforts now making to place the Yearly Meeting of Minis- ss apa Elders in a position superior to that of the Yearly Meeting, and to invest it with author- FRIENDS’ ity to decide questions of Discipline, which have been hitherto expressly withheld from it. The history of our Society shows that the Meetings of Ministers and Elders, as originally held—and not to be confounded with meetings of Ministers alone in a very early period—were strictly under the control and supervision of Meetings for Discipline, and this continues to be the case in Kngland. The Select Quarterly Meetings there furnish the Quarterly Meetings for Discipline with copies of the answers pre- pared to be sent to the Yearly Meeting of Min- jsters and Elders, and also the names of the Representatives appointed to attend it. They are further required to give to Quarterly Meet- ings of Discipline an account in writing, ‘as to the due holding of the Quarterly Meetings of Ministers and Elders, throughout the year.” The Yearly Meeting of Ministers and Elders in London is not in any wise to “take upon it, or interfere with, any part of the discipline of the Church” belonging either to the Yearly Meet- ing, or any subordinate meeting; but it is re- quired to lay annually before the Yearly Meet- ing a summary yet clear account of the state of the ministers and elders in the several Quar- terly Meetings. Our own Discipline directs that “ none of the said meetings of ministers and elders are to in- terfere with the business of any Meeting for Discipline.” ; It is very clear that both the Meeting for Sufferings and the Yearly Meeting of Ministers and Elders were originally intended to be, and should still be, subordinate and accountable to the Yearly Meeting. In the proceedings of the former meeting in Philadelphia for several years past, and in the attempt now strenuously made to transfer from the Yearly Meeting to the Meeting of Ministers and Elders the authority to decide from what Yearly Meetings our Yearly Meeting shall receive certificates, we have strik- ing illustrations of the truth of David Cooper’s Temark, that “in every human society there is an effort continually tending to increase the power and authority of the leaders and rulers.” Full of warning, too, is his observation, that ‘it is a truth which ought never to be lost sight of, that whenever a subordinate body becomes too important, either from their num- bers or the weight of the members, they natura lly engross a power and consequence beyond the REVIEW. 473 limits intended them; and thus grow, more or : less, out of the reach of that control the superior Ae body ought strenuously to maintain.” If the meetings of ministers and elders, over- looking the original object of their establishment, seek to exercise powers which properly belong to the body; or to be invested, contrary to the organic principles and long existing provisions of the Discipline, with authority that should be retained by the Yearly Meeting itself, the ques- tion will arise, whether it will not be for the good of the church that such meetings should either be dispensed with, or“ brought more thoroughly and directly under the control of the body of members. Frienps’ Scnoor at Unron Sprines, N.Y. —The attention of such of our readers as are in a position to avail themselves of the advantages of this institution, is asked to a notice of it this week. A correspondent who has opportunities to become acquainted with its condition, says:— ‘Our school is doing well, for the times—not so large as formerly, but paying its way, without any fund. We have a graduating elass of seven, who expect to graduate at the close of summer. Six graduated last summer. The course is very thorough for an institution of this kind.” ~~ Marrigp, at Friends’ Meeting, Greenfield, Tippeca- noe County, Indiana, on the 19th of 2d month, 1862, Cyrus Linptry, of Greenfield Monthly Meeting, son of David and Mary Lindley, to Marrua BE. Miuzr, of the same place, daughter of Henry and Charity Miller, (the latter deceased.) ——, at the same place, and on the same day, James Houtrncswortu to Racuen Evans, daughter of Jesse and Mary B. Evans, all of Greenfield Monthly Meeting. ——, at Center, month, 1861, Nixon Rusa to Lovisa WINSLOW, members of Back Creek Monthly Meeting. , at Back Creek, 11th mo. 21st, 1861, James M. Davinson, of Oakridge Monthly Meeting, to MARGARET G. Carry, of the former place, daughter of John Carey. Grant Co., Ind., on the 23d of 10th both —_—_——_ —, at Friends’ Meeting, Bloomington, Iowa, 16th of 10th mo- last, Joun Fry, of Oskaloosa, to ABIGAIL M. Jonson, of Muscatine, Iowa. —_—_—.__- ro Drep,—Tenth mo., 11th, 1861, Mary Ann Capsory, daughter of Joel and Caroline W. Cadbury, a member of the Northern District Monthly Meeting. This dear young friend was peculiarly led in her mission of kindness to visit the sick and solitary, brightening many lonely hours by her cheerful spirit and thought- ful attentions. During the last few months of her « life she was denied the privilege of much social in- tercourse with her friends; a harassing cough and FRIENDS’ But the vision was not yet fulfilled. One jot or| | one tittle of the law was not to pass away till all | was fulfilled. Therefore they were to ‘tell the vision to no man till the son of man be risen from the dead.” The old and figurative dispen- sation was to continue in fall force uotil then, and then the vision was to be fulfilled. Moses and Elias were to pass away, and Jesus to be left alone, the mediator of the new covenant, es- tablished upon better promises than the old. The divers outside washings and carnal ordinances which were a figure of the true, were to vanish at the brightness of his coming, and give place to the inward purifyings of the heart—the one baptism that now saveth ; which is not the put- ting away the filth of the flesh, but the answer of a good conscience towards God. | Peter was not willing to let Moses and Elias ~o. How is it with us in the present day? Are there not too many wishing to hold on to Moses and Elias, or the former dispensations, desiring that they, too, might dwell with Jesus—resting too much under the types and shadows of good things to come, instead of coming to the good things themselves—instead of coming to Him, the substance from whence all those shadows emanated. b But the transition from the old to the new covenant dispensation appears to have been grad- ual. There appears to have been, then, (and howis it now ?) astrong propensity towards that which was outward, visible and tangible. The preju- dice of education, perhaps, had a strong influ- ence, also, over the early Christians. They had long been accustomed to the ceremonial obser- vance of an outward law, hence many of the rituals of the old dispensation were still practised by the disciples and apostles after the ascension of our Lod Thus the baptism of John was also continued, to some extent, for a while. But John, himself, prophesied that he must decrease. He does not say that his ministration must come suddenly to an end; but decrease. And our Saviour, before his ascension, said, “I have many things to say to you, bat ye cannot bear them now.” ‘* Howbeit when he, the spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth ;” not usher them suddenly into a// truth, but, as they were willing to follow him, he would guide them there. So it was with the apostles, and so it may be with us. They tollowed him, their spiritual leader, away from the types and shadows of the old dispensation,—Him, the great anti- type of all—the spiritual baptizer of nes ee What a cloud of invisible witnesses encompass us ; how many never to be forgotten pilgrims of God, whose names live in our hearts and mem- ories, still preach to us, and comfort us by. mi remembered words and examples.—Krum- macher, oi yf BEAR ia eal ie ous beyond my ex REVIEW. 485 For Friends’ Review. NOTICES OF DAVID COOPER. NO. Il. _ On the 23d of the 4th month, 1747, (0. 8.) in the 23d year of my age, I was married to Sibyl, daughter of Timothy ani Martha Mailack, of Philadelphia. She was born the 6th of 12th month, 1730, (O. S.) and was, at this time, in her 17th year. And now I experienced a great change, for I became wholly weaned from com- pany, mirth and gaiety, of which I was fond be- fore I became acquainted with this truly amiable and lovely young woman, in whom my happiness and pleasure being much centered, home was my delight. My treasure was there, and there was my heart also. q After we had been married some time, [ was shown that my outward affairs appeared blessed, and looked prosperous beyond what I might have expected, and that something was due from me in grateful return to the Giver—that I ought to be more sober and exemplary, and attend week- day meetings, Xc.; for, although I had been brought up ina constant attendance on First-days, [had seldom been at a week-day or monthly meet- ing. This became a great exercise ; the enemy was near with his reasonings,—to the effect that I was not religious enough to attend these meet- ings, and to make so much show; that I knew some who, having been steady at meetings, ap- peared very religious, and made great pretences for a time, fell away, and occasioned reproach — that I had a young family for whom it was neces- sary to stay at home and work, Xe. But, a cov- enant which I had made before I was married was often set before me—which was on this wise :— The small-pox being in my intended father Matlack’s family, and ‘before I knew that Sibyl was taken down with it, one day as I came across the field from my work, thinking of the circum- stance the family was in, my mind was seized with an exceeding terror lest she should die with the disease. I sat down—and in great brokenness my mind was turned to the Almighty, in the tenor of Jacob’s covenant :—“If thou wilt, indeed, preserve her, and give her to me for a wife, then shalt thou be my Gop, and I will serve thee.” I afterwards found that about that time she was ill with the small-pox, and her recovery despaired of. Providence had given her to me, and my outward affairs were prosper- ectations, and I was clearly shown that unless I gave up to attend meetings, some judgment would surely follow. T would then, sometimes, if I had an errand that way, fall in with the meeting ; but this did not bring peace, and I became so sensible of some chas- tisement hanging over me, and a dread that it would be the loss of my wife, made it so great, that I have been for hours at my labour with my cheeks wet with weeping: and yet, so per- 4386 FRIENDS’ REVIEW. verse is human nature, I could not give up to what I knew was my duty. In this way I con- tinued till the fourth summer after my marriage, when just before harvest I was taken with a se- vere spell of sickness, which rendered me so weak and feeble as to be incapable of work ; and the following winter I was confined to my house with consumptive symptoms, from the second of November* to the fourth of Third month, and continued for several years but just capable of overseeing my business. I now could cheerfully give up to serve my Maker, and to attend meetings. Thus, in infinite mercy, is the rod used to accomplish that which favors do not, and to verify the Scripture, that they who will not bow in mercy shall bow in judgment. And, indeed, I have ever had to consider this dispensation as one of the greatest favors I have received from+the hand of an all-wise Providence, who thus in early life taught me to know from whence all good comes, and that the obedient only can taste his peace. Before this illness, all my affairs seemed to smile upon me, but they now wore a different face. The fore part of this winter, my low state of health made it probable that I should not go out of my house till I was carried out. Out of doors I had no one to look after my affairs but a negro boy (10 years of age,) and a Dutch servant, just arrived, who could speak or understand very little English. Here I was in a narrow strait. None could help but Divine Goodness, whom I had not been careful enough to please. To him alone was my application now turned, with great ear- nestness and ardor of soul; who was mer- cifully pleased by degrees to dispel the gloom. My brother John, in going to the West Indies was, in a violent hurricane, thought to be lost; but one evening sitting alone in my bed-room, I heard a knocking at the door, and on opening it beheld my brother. The surprise was so great that I could not speak to him, but the tears gushed from my eyes. I had never known such an effect from joy. He stayed with me, and took care of my outward affairs, and I recovered slowly, so that in the spring I got out of doors again. I now saw the necessity of endeavoring to be in reality what I professed to be. This required great circumspection in my words and conduct, and I found the necessity of observing our Lord’s injunction; “‘ Watch and pray continually, lest ye eifter into temptation.” One instance I may remark. Being at the smith’s waiting for work, *It is hardly needful to remind the reader that Friends used without hesitation the Latin numerical names of the months, till in the change of style they became inappropriate, D. C. subsequently notes: “In 1751, the style was altered ; 1752, to begin the first of First month, Sep- tember following to have but 19 days,” he, knowing me to be a great reader, I had read the life of the Duke of Ma I answered that I had not, and he offe: it to me, The query immediately spre mind with much strength,—as I p have a testimony against all wars and what would he (who was a strict Pres think of my taking pleasure in readi chiefly on that subject. This check 1 decline his offer—and clear I am in th tion, that the more our minds are redeen the world and the spirit of it, the less tion we shall have in reading books of th or in conversing upon such subjects; as it ever — hath a tendency to leaven the mind in t same nature, as certainly as doth fami ; evil company. [D. C. here narrates at length an e cumstance, which occurred in 4th mo His little daughter,* about two years playing with her cousins, and was sup have followed them home, but was lost woods. When her loss was discovered, nearly dark—the sky was overcast, and | cold wind was blowing, with the prospec snow-storm. Two families were long engaged © in anxious search for her, and ready to despair of success, with the conclusion that she m inevitably perish before morning, when her uncle calling in a loud, sharp tone to some per- soas at a distance, aroused the child, who was sleeping by the limb of a tree, and cried | in alarm, at suddenly waking in so strangs place.] a He took her up, but she appeared ened that we could not get a word from he we reached the house. My two brother: present, we sat for some time in sile an humble thankfulness to that — whose goodness had answered our anxious cri in giving to us again our innocent babe season not to be forgotten. In this mann it sometimes please Divine Goodness to his creatures, whether their dependence upon him, or whether they will rely upon own prudence, like the King of Israel, it is remarked that in his disease, althov was great, he sought not to the Lord, but physicians. And how often have his ch to experience, when their trust and confi are singly in him, that no strait or diflicu too great for him to deliver from-—that open a way where there was no way, an their hearts with songs of praise on the bank deliverance. fe About this times eight . .. . 2 ters had a meeting in the neighborhood 1 dain a brother to take charge of the flocl Woodbury and Timber Creek. The ordin sermon was printed, and a neighbor gay i ale is ei * Elizabeth, afterwards wife of John Tai She lived until 11th mo, 11th, 1814, © FRIENDS’ to read. It was made up of texts and arguments to enforce a cheerful and liberal maintenance of the minister—no concern about how the peo- ple lived, so that they did but contribute freely. This was the object to be regarded. The min- ister must live well, let the flock fare as they will. hus, they were told not to “imagine that your minister is beholden to you for giving —no, you are as much beholden to him for re- ceiving ’—that such and such awful texts en- join it, &e. [The reader will perceive, that this was an open advocacy of the system of preaching for a pecuniary compensation. It is not surprising that the zeal of an early Quaker, in whose memory cruel persecutions on this account were fresh from recent tradition, should be stirred up. “The reading of it,” he says, “raised an in- dignation in me, tosee the true end of the gos ministry so prostituted.” pen a brief manuscript testimony which was circulated in the neighborhood, in which he was somewhat satirical upon those who, whilst as- suming the office of the gospel ministry, were “dumb” unless money was secured to them, comparing them to idle drones eating the honey, unwilling to labor in the Lord’s vineyard on his own terms of compensation, and archly suggesting that a penny a day is too low for them.” And surely when the hire in money is the motive for preaching, such laborers are not to be placed in the same category with those, under whatever name, who in the con- straining love of Christ, and for the pure yearn- ing to win souls unto him, declare his message of life and salvation to a dying world. To one thus imbued with the spirit of our Lord and of his Apostles ; to one feeling, with Paul, “ woe is me if I preach not the Gospel,”—the question whether or not they should give out to others what they have received so freely, will hardly be made contingent on the amount in money se- cured to them by a business contract. ] 1756, 11th of Twelfth month, the first Meet- ing for Sufferings was held at Philadelphia. The members for our Quarter were Wm. Foster, Ebenezer Hopkins, James Cooper, and myself. It was now agreed that it should be held on the second Fifth-day in each month; to begin the third hour after noon. The time was after- wards altered to the third Fifth-day—and so re- mains to this time. —_—_——- or [The following letter was published in ‘“‘ The Non-Slaveholder,” more than fifteen years ayo, and was believed to have been addressed to Robert Pleasants. There can be no doubt that it was written by P. Henry, and we may repeat the remark of the Editors of Zhe Non- Slave- holder, that “ it isa noble testimony to the truth, by the great Orator and Statesman, but we have to regret that, in paying his ‘devoir to virtue,’ It elicited from his} R E Tis WY, 487 he did not ‘choose’ as well as ‘approve’ her.” —Kp. Frienps’ Review.] s From the Auburn Union. THE SLAVE TRADE AND SLAVERY. We are indebted to Wm. Howland, Esq., of Sherwood’s Corners, in this county, for the priv- ilege of perusing and transcribing for publica- tion this veritable and original letter from Patrick Henry. It was addressed to John Alsop, a ven- erable and worthy member of the Society of Friends, then residing at Hudson, N. Y. Hanover, Va., January 13, 1773. Dear Sir: I take this opportunity to ac- knowledge the receipt of Anthony Benezet’s book against the slave trade. Ithank youforit. It is not a little surprising that Christianity, whose chief excellence consists in softening the human heart, in cherishing and improving its finer feel- ings, should encourage a practice sd totally re- pugnant to the first impressions of right and wrong. What adds to the wonder is, that this abominable practice has been introduced in the most enlightened ages. Times that seem to have pretensions to boast of high improvements in arts, sciences and refined morality, have brought into general use, and guarded by many laws, a species of violence and tyranny which our more rude and barbarous, but more honest, ancestors detested. Is it not amazing that at the time when the rights of humanity are defined and understood with precision, in a country, above all others, fond of liberty—that in such an age and in such a country we find men professing a religion the most humane, mild, meek, gentle and generous, adopting a principle as repugnant to humanity as it is inconsistent with the Bible and destruc- tive to liberty? Every thinking, honest man re- jectsit in speculation. How few, in practice, from conscientious motives ! The world, in general, has denied your people a share of its honors; but the wise will ascribe to you a just tribute of virtuous praise for the practice of a train of virtues, among which your disagreement to slavery will be principally rank- ed. I cannot but wish well to a people whose system imitates the example of Him whose life was perfect; and believe me, I shall honor the Quakers for their noble efforts to abolish slavery. It was equally calculated to promote moral and political good. Would any one believe that I am master of slaves by my own purchase? I am drawn along by the general inconvenience of living without them. 1 will not—I cannot justify it, however culpable my conduct. I will so far pay my devoir to Virtue, as to own the excellence and rectitude of her precepts, and to lament my want of con- formity to them. I believe a time will come when an opportunity will be afforded to abolish this Iamentable evil. Everything we can do, is to improve it, if it happens in our day; if not, FRIENDS’ tleness,” &c., whilst in contrast to these, we are told that “ The works of the flesh are hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, envyings, murders,’ &c.—Gal. v., 20, &. Which of these two is the spirit of the battlefield, shall be answered by a writer in the Times:— The very idea of having something to do has hada most beneficial effect upon the men, who swear that they will make the Russians pay dearly for what they have suffered in Bulgaria;” whilst a writer from the Baltic fleet declared, “The whole fleet israving mad for revenge ;” and of the camp in the Crimea, it was affirmed at the same time, “ The allied armies are all eager to revenge upon the Russians the losses and dis- asters of the past.” And to these I might add the query, Which was the spirit that animated the British soldiers in India, when, in retaliation for the wrongs they had suffered, they bound the bodies of the Indian mutineers to the mouth of the cannon, and blew them into the air. It would take up much of our time to run through the whole of the passages of the New Testament in which the great duty of LOVE is in- culcated—the very key-stone of Christianity,— and of which the apostle emphatically declared on one occasion that ‘* Love is the fulfilling of the law.””—Rom. xiii. 10. That these injunctions of our Saviour and his apostles were illustrated by their lives and ex- ample, I need only to refer to that memorable prayer of the Saviour for his murderers: ‘ Fa- ther, forgive them, for they know not what they do;” and to the last words of Stephen, when he said, ‘‘ Lord, lay not this sin to their charge.”— Acts vii. 60. It is almost an insult to the common sense of my hearers, to ask them what is the meaning of passages such as I have quoted. It would be nearly as rational to deny that the sun shines at noonday, as to assert that they do not bear one unmistakable meaning ; that they are not op- posed in all their authority and fulness, to those passions and feelings without which ‘wars could not be carried on. They are not metaphorical —they are not figurative—but are a part of the simple declaration of truth, which the wayfar- ing man, though a fool, may perfectly under- stand. nenerseremnaeaponetigiG pnipnintionetinncians For Friends’ Review. NOTICES OF DAVID COOPER. NO. Il, “Tn the year 1755, I was much exercised in mind and buffeted by the enemy, and being at our meeting the 14th of 12th month in great distress, our friend Joshua Lord spoke largely on Isaiah 54; 11—* Oh, thou afflicted, tossed with tempests and not comforted ! behold I will] lay thy stones with fair colors, und lay thy foun- | dations with sapphires. And I will make thy Windows of ‘agates,and thy gates of carbuncles, -| who hath all power, REVIEW. 501 and all thy borders of pleasant stones. And all thy children shall be taught of the Lord, and gs,| great shall be the peace of thy children. In righteousness shalt thou be established,” &c. The fore part of which was so exactly my then situation, that what he had to say to that state was indeed balm to me—and the joy and com- fort thereby administered were so great, that I could scarcely forbear, after meeting, taking him in my arms and embracinghim. And as neither. this friend nor any one living knew of my ex- ercises, 1t was sufficient to have convinced me of the truth of revelation, had I disbelieved it before. I spent the afternoon in retirement, and had such a sight of the trials, exercises, and strippings of a real Christian (much of which it appeared to me that I should have to pass through) as made my whole frame tremble under a sense thereof. ‘My beloved wife had also about this time some very close trials, which Divine Goodness had prepared and strengthened her mind to bear, by teaching her in a very singular manner to place her trust and confidence in him who was all sufficient. The account whereof she related to me as follows, about a month after it happened. The relation was accompanied with heavenly sweetness and Divine love, in a higher degree, I think, than I was ever before sensible of. “In the year 1754, in the first month, soon after the birth of my fourth child, I, Sibyl Cooper, in a dream thought I was standing in our porch, and the sky became very black with . clouds, and [ saw in the east a stream of fire that reached almost to where I stood. The clouds seemed to threaten severe thunder, and I felt much terrified, as being in great danger where I was—and I concluded that if I was in the house I should be more safe. I accordingly went in, but my terror continued, and I felt con- demned for endeavoring to fly from danger ; being shown that I was equally within the reach of Providence there and out of doors, and that His power would equally preserve me in ‘one place as in another. In this surprise and horror I awoke. And, as I lay musing upon my dream, a being came on to the bed, attended with a most melodious ‘sound. It seemed to have wings, and with them to move itself gently to the bed’s head; and though I perceived the | nurse to be asleep, yet considering what I had that I was guarded by Him and that nothing would hurt ‘me contrary to his will, it removed all fear. When this consideration fixed in my mind, it took hold of my shoulder as I lay on one side, and, with a sweet and heavenly voice that might have been heard all over the room, said: ‘ How oft have I guarded thee, —and then descended : | the same melodicus sound continuing from the time it came on the bed, until it went off, only ceasing whilst those words were uttered.” just been taught, « She also now related to me something of the 502 FRIENDS’ REVIEW. same nature, which I believe she had not before mentioned to any one, though it had happened four years previous : so careful was she not to be too free in speaking of Divine things; but I have now thought there may bea use in re- cording these accounts.” ‘In the year 1749, going to bed before my husband, and having my mind upon my Creator and my duty to him; considering how many people I knew whom I believed to be good men and women, and how unlike them I was, and earnestly wishing that I could be as good as they were ; | heard a most sweet and melodious voice distinctly say: ‘ Child, so thou may, ” A few years after thedate of the impressions, which Sibyl Cooper thus narrates with trans- parent candor, and leaves without comment, John Woolman partook one night* in Burling- ton, N. J., of the hospitality of his friend John Smith, brother to Samuel Smith the historian, in the house subsequently occupied by Peter Worral, whose wife was mother to George and William Dillwyo and Ann Cox, (“to name them is to praise,”) and more recently by those dear old Is- raelites, Nathanieland Elizabeth Coleman. Hav- ing retired at his usual time, he says : “‘ 1 awoke in the night, and my meditations as Llay were onthe goodness and mercy of the Lord ; ina sense where- of my heart was contrite. After this, I went to sleep again ; and sleeping a short time, I awoke. It was yet dark, and no appearance of day or moonshine ; and as I opened mine eyes, I saw a light in my chamber at the apparent distance of five feet, about nine inches diameter, of a clear easy brightness, and near its centre the most radiant. As TI lay still, without any sur- prise, looking upon it, words were spoken tomy inward ear, which filled my whole inward man ; they were not the effect of thought, nor any conclusion in relation to the appearance, but as the language of the Holy One spoken in my mind: the words were, ‘certain evidenceof Divine truth ;’ and were again repeated, exactly in the same manner; whereupon the light disap- eared.” John Woolman’s conscientiousness in the use of words, oral or written, is proverbial. It is this which has made his style, though he was an unlearned man, a model, and which induced Charles Lamb to say: “Get the writings of John Woolman by heart, and learn to love the Early Quakers.” His narrative in this case, so Scripture-like in its unostentatious simplicity may be taken as unquestioned truth. The ex- periences of 8. ©. recorded above, are certainly kindred in their character, and whilst this ex- cellent woman regarded them as almost too sacred to communicate, and yet could not with an easy _ mind entirely withhold them, it can hardly be inappropriate to extend the knowledge of them through the medium of a Journal, which, in various parts of our country, is read bers of her descendants. ere Her husband, in recording the account, mak only this comment: ‘Some may doubt he being awake at these times, which I sha undertake to determine,—but of this I a sensible,—that she thought herself so, an there was no room for adoubt in her own We resume the Diary. ” “In the Seventh month, 1756, I y pointed one of the overseers of our meeting at Woodbury. I had been nominated, and much pressed to accept the appointment some time before, but the weight of the service, and the sense of my own unfitness, occasioned me to withstand the request of my friends. I was condemned and much distressed in mind for re- fusing a service in the church of which my friends thought me capable, and this was so heavy at times that I often wished Friends would move it again, that so I might submit to what I clearly saw I ought before to have done; which at length was the case, and I was ap- pointed. But oh, the weight of the service, and a sense of my own weakness and unfitness for so important a trust, had a humbling effect on my mind ; in which state | saw the great necessity of applying for and receiving Divine aid and as- sistance in all our religious labors. And when clothed with this power and authority the least stripling need not be dismayed. However moun- tainous the service may appear, that Power which divided the sea to make a way for his peo- ple to pass over, and which enabled the little shepherd to slay Goliath of Gath, never failed those who move in His power, and whose trust is in Him alone, and not in their own under- standing. And I may with deep ‘fulness remark that I have seldom attempted to treat with an offender, without first laboring to feel this seasoning virtue to cover my mind ; which gives weight to the labor, and keeps down the opposing spirit in those who are treated with ; so that I think I have not had a sour or reflect- ing expression used to me on these occasions, from the time of my appointment as overseer to the time of writing this. And indeed, in those early times, when I have been going to speak to offenders, a sense of my own shortness and fail- ing, and of Divine mercy in forgiving and pass- ing them by, hath often, even on the way, ex- ceedingly affected and tendered my mind, in the reflection that I, who had so much to be for- given, should have to tell others of their of- fences :—and this tended much to preserve from a harsh and censorious spirit, which is very apt to get up when we are speaking to offenders,—~ as we see jt did, even in meek Moses. ‘Ye rebels,’ said he, ‘must I bring water out of this rock ?’—and instead of speaking to the rock he smote it. Oy “How displeasing this was to the Almighty, % * 2d mo, 13th, 1757. appears, in so much that for this offence he was FRIENDS? not permitted to go into the promised land. How careful ought we, then, to be, that, in deal- ing with transgressors, we suffer not our own spirits and tempers to be active, but at all times wait to feel that ability which enables to labor successfully in the Church of Christ.”’ In the polity of the Society of Friends the office of Overseer isan arduous one, and of great importance to the health of the body. To those who enter upon it, the exhortation is appropriate ; “Let the same mind be in you which was also in Christ Jesus.” Every official act requires a renewal of qualification from him who is their life; and should be performed in love, after waiting upon the Lord for counsel, with prayer- ful desire that the heart of the brother or sister to be visited may be prepared to accept with kindness and with profit the word of admonition. It should be ever borne in mind that the true object of labor is the good of souls, and not the mere satisfying of the law, and were this uni- formly the case, the weak and the halting, in- stead of being driven from the fold, would more frequently be gathered back to it; and, like the great and good Shepherd of the sheep, the dele- gated shepherds would often “ carry the lambs in their bosom.” David Cooper, as an- Overseer, evinced the wisdom, pure, peaceable and gentle, which is from above. For Friends’ Review. Wilt thou be made whole ?—John vy. 6. The narrative from whence these words are taken may be considered as a representation of the two dispensations—the one Jewish and the other Christian ; the one limited in its benefits to one nation, the other of universal application. The first sets forth the benefit of works ; the sec- ond the necessity of faith; and we do well to keep in memory that all the promises of the gospel rest on our application, by faith in the] great sacrifice for sin in the suffering and death of the Son, and the acceptance of the.Father of the gift of his Son; and this we have an assur- — of in that the Father raised him from the aead. . “Wilt thou be made whole?” This is an important inquiry, and one in which we are all interested, inasmuch as all are diseased by rea- son of sin and transgression, and consequently all need the aid of medicine and the skill and ability of a physician, who ean give unquestion- able testimony that no disease, however long- standing, or however deeply rooted in the sys- tem, is beyond his ability to manage and perfect- ly cure. This skilful physician is Jesus of Nazareth, he who makes the inquiry, “ Wilt thou be made whole?” If we wish for testi-} mony of his ability and willingness to relieve the sick and afflicted, we shall find ample proof in the New Testament of the most Patines dis- cases being cured by His almighty power, where REVIEW. 503 ever there is found a willingness in the patient tocomply with his directions—John ix. 7. Also, that He has the control over the mird and soul of man ; that none need be discouraged by rea- son of peculiar disease, for His skill is sufficient to meet every malady that we are the subjects of. The diseased mind was as easily cured by Him as the diseased body, as we may find— Mark v. 15; and the most notorious transgres- sions were forgiven when application was made with repentance and faith—Luke vii. 47, 48. Thus we have every encouragement to apply to ‘this great Physician, and to hope and believe that he will restore unto us health and sound- ness, and that each one may become an additional ~~ to his goodness and unlimited power and skill. It may be that our diseases are of a peculiar character and of long standing; also, in time past, very unwilling to yield to medical treat- ment; and that we feel great feebleness and even a want of courage to use the little strength remaining to enable us to apply the remedies which we see are within our reach. Yet there is hope from a remembrance that Christ had compassion on the poor invalid whom he found lying by the side of the pool, and not only re- stored him to health, but gave him strength of mind to present himself in the temple and there join his kindred and friends in returning thanks for the great deliverance wrought for him by the power of Jesus of Nazareth. May the ex- ample of the poor man encourage us to comply with the wish and design of our Great Physician in restoring us to perfect soundness, and giving us the ability to worship acceptably in his tem- ple. Then can we join in the anthem, “ Great and marvellous are thy works, Lord God Al- mighty ; just and true are thy ways, thou King of Saints.” ao W. HO For the Children. N _ THE BIBLE PRECIOUS TO THE SUFFERING. “Q dear!” sighed a little girl, sinking back on her pillow exhausted, while a tear stole from under the closed lid and trickled down her pale cheek. She was an afflicted and suffering child, and her life was slowly passing away by the ravages made on her tender constitution by that fearful disease, serofula. ‘“ What does my daughter want?” asked her mother. “ Patience, tience,” replied the child. “Oh! my mother, it does so weary me to have so many bad places washed and dressed! I feel as though 7 had no strength left. Iam sure I cannot bear it much longer. What shall I do?” The mother gazed with mournful sadness upon her child, and, in a voice trembling with emotion, said, “ Has my darling forgotten that her Heavenly Father has promised He will lay no more on her than He will enable her to bear? Do you distrust His FRIENDS?’ if she had anything more to say, it was “to im- press the necessity of faithfulness on old and young,” and that she left it as her “ dying legacy that faithfulness to the inward monitor should be | attended to in smal/ matters as well as greater.’’ She very solemnly said it was “ a great blessing that, from the first of her illness, she had be- lieved that the end would be peace :” adding, “Oh ! it is all of merey—merey—nothing short of it to a poor creature.” She had much enjoy- ed hearing the Scriptures read, and her remarks on them were very instructive; they proved com- forting to her even a few hours before the final close. Her last days were marked by a very solemn and peaceful influence, her thoughts be- ing evidently fixed on heavenly things: her judgment continued clear, whilst the bodily: powers gradually declined, until the 22d of the Seventh month. On the morning of that day, after a quiet sleep, the moment arrived when, with no reliance on the merit of a well-spent life, but with a humble faith in the mercy of God in Christ, our omnipotent Saviour, the spirit of this meek disciple—sustained by heavenly peace and love—was gently disrobed of mor- tality ; and, as we cannot doubt, was clothed up- on with the garment of eternal salyation.— Lng. Annual Monitor. For Friends’ Review. NOTICES OF DAVID COOPER. NO. IV. Some evidences have already been given of Sibyl Cooper’s religious dedication and matu- rity. Of her individual loveliness, of the traits, personal and mental, which made her an object of unusually strong affection, although fond tra- dition is still eloquent, it would be impossible to convey an adequate idea. Attractive in fea- tures, in person, and in manners, these charms were heightened by ‘‘ An intellectual beauty, like a light within a vase,” and hallowed by that ‘¢ grace upon grace”’ ob- served upon the lowly and devout, and which Charles Lamb meant when he said :—“I bave seen faces upon which the dove of peace sat brooding.”” | David Cooper was now to endure what the writer conceives to be the greatest affliction, un- connected with crime, that falls to the lot of man. The precious partner of his heart and life was taken ill on the 16th of Fourth mo., 1759. Every means of relief suggested by affection and by medical skill proved insufficient, and the pure spirit vacated its beautiful tabernacle on the Ist of Fifth month, “ about thirty minutes after 9 o’clock in the morning.” ‘ Three days more,” her husband notes, ‘ would have ended twelve years of married life.” ‘A short time before her departure,” (we quote REVIEW. 515 from the diary,) “many of her relatives and friends being present, she desired to be raised, and asked for some cold water; then said : ‘ Lay me down, and let me die.’ Upon which she breathed the following supplication :— ‘Oh Lord, have mercy upon my poor soul, and be pleased to be with me; for Thou hast been good to me all my life, and art so to all those who put their trust in Thee. Thou knowest, Oh Lord, how I have walked before Thee, and as Thou hast been with me in my six troubles, leave me not, nor forsake me in my seventh ; but still be with me, if it be Thy bles- sed will. And, Oh Lord, be pleased, I beseech Thee, to be with Thy church and people, and keep them near to Thyself; and remember the poor and tribulated ones, wherever they may be, the world over; and deliver Thy suffering seed, if it be Thy blessed will. And, dearest Father, r.- member my little ones, my tender offspring. Be with them, Oh Lord, and preserve them from the evils which are in the world. To Thee I commit my poor little babe.* I give him up freely. Thou canst do fore for him than I can. ‘ Blessed God, I have lived in Thy fear, and die a lover of Thy blessed Truth and Church. To Thee I commit my body, soul and spirit! To Thee, holy Father, and to Thy dear Son, the Lamb, belong all glory, honor and high re- nown. Let it be ascribed and given, now, hence- forth and forever.’ “ After this, she said :—‘Give my love to all my dear relations and friends, and all those who love the Lord, everywhere; for I have loved the Lord and his Truth all my life. Give my love to Friends of Haddonfield meeting, for I love them all. Give me one drop more of cold water,’ and then ‘let me go, if it be Thy will, oh Father!’ Divers times repeating, ‘ Come death, come death !’ ‘Being in much agony, she prayed that her passage might be made easy, and then said:— ‘Why is it thus, Father? Father, why is it thus? Abba, Father!’ After a time of still- ness, she said to us, ‘Oh, give me up—give me up.’ Some thought she desired to be raised up, but she put them by with her hand, repeat- ing what she had said. A little after, she said : ‘My dear, give me up.’ Then speaking with- out reference to those around her, she often re- peated, ‘Abba, Father!’ and, afterward, said emphatically, ‘this is the end of all fear.’ “The blood retired from her face, and she was thought expiring, but it returned, and she came to her natural color, as in a time of health; and opening her eyes, asked to be raised up. She seemed to admire to find hersclf still with us; saying, ‘ Where have I been? Where have I been? Is it possible for me to die twice ?” {said, * About one year old. He died in his tenth year, a very conscicntious, virtuous boy. 516 FRIENDS’ REVIEW. ‘My dear, it may be the Almighty will please to restore thee to us again.’ She replied, ‘I have not desired it.’ She took a little drink, asked to be laid down, and then to be turned on one side, and she never spoke more, but died away, like one going into a sweet sleep, without sigh or groan. “‘ Pavor is deceitful, and beauty is vain, but a woman that feareth the Lord, she shall be praised.” ‘“ These memorials of my dear wife, I thought, claimed my care to preserve. As the dying sayings of the righteous are ever sweet and living to those who are following their footsteps, so, in a particular manner, are these to me, who have been so intimate a witness of her religious and innocent life, her exemplary and circum- spect walking, whereby she attained the happy experience and full assurance that her Redeemer lives; wherein she could look beyond mortality, and triumphantly say, ‘Ob, Death, where is thy sting; Oh, Grave, where is thy victory!’ Death appeared to have no terror. Her innocent soul seemed to think the time tedious, till it could be released from this clog of flesh, to ascend into the arms of its blessed Saviour, there to laud and praise His holy name forever and ever. May it excite in us, who are left behind for a little space, a lively concern to be as well pre- pared for that trying hour, the touchstone of pre- ceding life, that so we may die the death of the righteous, and our latter end be, like hers, sweet and instructive to the beholders. “¢ And, now, my dear children, at the writing of this, after an absence of more than 23 years, when the fervor of affection must have subsided, and there can be nothing to bias me from an im- partial judgment, I may say (in order to incite you to conduct worthy of such a mother,) that I have never yet seen her equal: so many ex- cellent endowments and amiable qualities cen- tered in one person. A sweetness of disposi- tion, even and steady temper, courteous and en- gaging demeanor, firm and unshaken friendship, and, above all, strength and fortitude of mind through every scene of life, were excellencies that have hardly been possessed in a higher de- gree; to which may be added, a quick and ready apprehension and sound judgment, cheerful, but modest, always making the best of things: so that a complaint of any kind, or slighting ex- pression concerning others seldom escaped her lips. And the meek, diffident and sincere Chris- tian (equally distant from ostentation or bigot- ry) shone through, and gave a lustre to her whole conduct. “Such, my dear children, was your mother. Such the woman who gave you birth, and whose tender hand supported your infant days. The only return you can make her is to live as she did, imitate her virtues, that so your end, like hers, may be peace.” At her funeral, the gospel of Him who has abolished death and illustrated life and immor- tality, was preached by William Rickett, (from England,) by Hannah Foster, and by those dig. nified and eminent ministers of Christ, Daniel Stanton and John Pemberton. sie D. C., now left with six children, the young. est less than one year, the eldest less than twelve years of age, was plunged into a depth of distress, of which, he justly remarks, “ none can be sensible but those who have passed through the like conflict.” But the stricken husband was a Christian, and he knew whither to resort for help. He poured out his soul in prayer for unmurmuring resignation, blessing the holy name ot Him who had taken to himself so rich a boon, and reverently exclaiming, “Thou art able to cause the sea which threat- ens my overthrow to be my deliverer.” —_- Feeble in health, depressed in spirits, the world faded in his view; he looked and longed to ‘flee away, and be at rest.” ‘“ While in this state,” he writes, ‘‘it seemed to be said to me, ‘unless thou art resolved to destroy thyself, shake off this gloom, and see after thy business.’ ”” Mary Matlack, daughter of Wm. Matlack, and an inmate of D. Cooper’s family, died Fourth month 17th, 1759 ; Sibyl Cooper, daughter of Timothy Matlack (brother to said William), on Ist of Fifth month; and Deborah, daughter of Richard Matlack (another brother), the wife of D. C.’s brother James, on the 12th of Sixth month ; “all on a third day of the week, and all in the course of eight weeks.” Timothy Mat- lack of Revolutionary memory, who died at a great age, and was known to many of our read- ers, was brother to Sibyl Cooper. jog ‘«« My sister Hannah kept house for me about two years, when my daughter Martha, (my eldest child), then about 14 years of age, took the care of my family,so that I had no occasion for other housekeeper. And great cause of thankfulness have I had on her account, to the Giver of every good, who thus favored me with a child capable of conducting my family, and taking care of five younger children, at an age when she might be supposed herself to be in the greatest need of a mistress.” # In the year 1760 the fatal prevalence of small- pox caused much alarm in the neighborhood, and on the 22d of Second month D. C.’s young- est daughter, Ann, (subsequently wife of Rich- ard Wood), showed symptoms of the complaint. Considerable excitement existed on the subject of inoculation, (vaccination not being introduced by Dr. Jenner till 16 years later.) David Coop- er’s mind was much exercised in this matter. No Friends had, to his knowledge, resorted to this means, which appeared, at the least, to in- volve a certain risk; and by many was regarded as tempting Providence. To him it rather ap- peared “a merciful discovery of Providence, whereby his creatures might pass through that dreadful distemper with less danger and suffer- FRIENDS’ ing.” But it was now in his house, with little time to deliberate, and he had five other children whose safety was connected with the decision. Thinking it due to the relatives of their beloved mother to be consulted, he hastened to Philadel- phia for that purpose, and meeting no dis- couragement he brought a physician home with him, who inoculated two daughters, three sons, and an apprentice. These all had the discase in the most favorable manner, “whilst their poor sister underwent abundance, her recovery being for some time doubtful.” ‘TI was,” he writes, ‘‘ much blamed for this act; Friends, at this time, generally disapproving the practice, so that it was frequently censured from the gal- lery ; but I felt no condemnation in myself, but a satisfaction that I had used the means put in my power to carry my children favorably through a disorder which hath proved fatal to such num- bers.” eesti pital she Sas EXTRACT OF A LETTER FROM GEORGE DILWYN, Burlington, 11th Month 12, 1808. The ways of Providence are a great deep, which we cannot fathom with reason’s longest line ; but, when the veil is at length drawn over this ever-changing scene, it will be: nothing to us whether our passage through has been pleas- ing or painful—calm or stormy—long or short ; and, if the blessed port is but reached, we shall then at least be convinced, that most of the head winds and hard gales we have had to contend with, were ‘ blessings in disguise,’ and the means of preserving us, either from the enemy’s cruisers, hurricanes in the latitudes we were hastened from, or other perils of which we had no apprehension at the time. Sig tiga ei tad WAR AND OHRISTIANITY. BY W. ROWNTREE, (Continued from page 501.) War has been described by the eloquent Robert Hall “as reversing, with respect to its objects, all the rules of morality. It is nothing less than a temporary repeal of all the principles of virtue. It is a system outof which almost all the virtues are excluded, and in which nearly all the vices are incorporated.” Whilst Erasmus says, ‘They who defend war, must defend the dispositions that lead to war; and these dispositions are ab- solutely forbidden by the gospel.” ‘Tam persuaded,” says the Bishop of Llan- daff, “ that when Christianity shall exert its prop- er influence, wars will cease throughout the whole Christian world;’’ whilst the eminent Robert Southey says, (and here I must be ex- cused for referring to my own sect), “There is but one community of Christians in the world, and that unhappily one of the smallest, enlight- ened enough to perceive the prohibition of war by our Divine Master in its plain, literal, and REVIEW. oe undeniable sense, and conscientious enough to obey it, subduing the eo of nature to obedience.” In justice to the Moravians,* it should be said, that they, too, hold the same doctrine. ; Dr. Adam Clark, the very learned Wesleyan commentator, declares war to be “‘as contrary to Christianity as murder;”’ and that “nothing can justify nations shedding each others blood;”’ and John Angell James says, “A hatred of war is an essential feature of genuine Christianity; and it isa shame upon what is called the Christian world, that it has not long since borne universal and indignant testimony against this enormous evil.” a Ina petition presented to Parliament in 1595, for a reformation of the church, it is curious to notice that the petitioners prayed the Parlia- ment to abolish war.—D’ Aubigne, v. 5. p. IAL. Dr. Arnold, in writing on the Church, says, “Did it become a Christian Church to make no other declaration of its sentiments concerning war, than by saying that Christian men might lawfully engage in it? Will it be asked, what evil has arisen from the neglect of this duty ? I answer that the evil is to be seen in the un- christian principles and practices of our rulers, and of all public men, considered as such from the Reformation down to this very hour.” — The late most estimable Frederick Myers, in- cumbent of St. John’s, Keswick, in his beauti- ful essays on “Great Men,” remarks in the essay on Cromwell, whilst approving of his con- necting devotional exercises with his battles, “Truly this is not the highest way of thinking and feeling, for we have no types of these things under the new dispensation.” He then goeson to say, and nothing can be more expressive of — the doubts that many good men like Myers feel, but which are suppressed by the influence of education,‘ Jf war be consistent with Chris- tianity,—7f to be a soldier be compatible with being a Christian, this guiding principle of Crom- well’s was the nearest approach we have seen as yet, to the true spirit of the Christian war- rior.’ ‘There is no doubt that many pious min- isters in the Established Church share these doubts with Arnold and Myers. Even Plutarch, a heathen writer, uses these expressions:— ‘“There is no war among men but what arises from some vice; either from immoderate lust, er from covetousness, or from ambition, or an immoderate love of glory.” Bonaparte, in his hours of bitter reflection, declared war to he “the business of barbarians,’ and that “the worse the man the better the soldier ;” and Sir Harry Smith, at a public dinnerin London, said, “ Ours, gentleman, is a damnable profession.” That the views which [ have given, of the scope and spirit of the New Testament, were ‘*The Moravians in America, do not appear at pre3- ent to maintain the doctrines of peace.-—[ Ep. Frienps’ Review. ] ah FRIENDS’ REVIEW. A Aeligtous, Literary and Miscellancous Journal, Vou. XV. —_—~, EDITED BY SAMUEL RHOADS, To whom all Communications may be addressed. PUBLISHED WEEKLY, At No. 109 N. Tenth street, Philadelphia. Price, PAYABLE IN ADVANCE, Two dollars per annum, or six copies for Ten dollars. . : : Postage on this paper, when paid quarterly or yearly in advance, 13 cents per annum in Pennsylvania, and 26 cents per annum in other States. Fi For Friends’ Review. NOTICES OF DAVID COOPER. NO. V. “In the Third month, 1761,* was to be an election of representatives to sit in General Assembly. I was much solicited to accept the post, but as Friends had for some years been drawing off from these publie stations, I was doubtful whether I could safely submit to it. At length I came to this conclusion, that I would neither encourage nor discourage those who ap- plied to me, and if it should be cast into my lap without any endeavor of mine, I should conclude it was my duty to accept it. Accordingly, I was chosen in my absence, and being notified thereof, and that the House was to meet in a few | p days, I attended, and for the first time felt the weight of this important trust, a sense of which, and of the many temptations to deviate from an honest and faithful discharge of duty to the public, occasioned me to form and pen resolu- tions to govern my future conduct by; that if Court favor or the smiles of great men should test my integrity, these resolutions might help to strengthen it. ' “The House of Assembly at that time con- sisted of twenty-four members, seven of whom were Friends. I held a seat about eight years, when a dissolution took place, and L joyfully returned to private life, resolved that no persua- sions should prevail on me to again exchange it _ for the bustles of a statesman. It is a school that, as I conceive, above all others, teaches to know men. A competent idea ean only by ex- * D, OC. was then in his 37th year. PHILADELPHIA, FOURTH MONTH 26, 1862. No. 34, perience be formed of the art and intrigue con- stantly practiced to bias and lead one another to carry points and serve private ends. We here see how few men have a sufficient stock of in- tegrity to support. them upright through all the intricacies of state policy; and it is this that makes it so dangerous for a religious mind to be concerned in such a scene of cunning, so full of snares to lead from the line of duty and the path of an upright, honest man. But he who hath strength sufficient to preserve his integri- ty unsoiled isin a station to do great good to his fellow men and may honor his Maker, and be as good a Christian in the Legislature as out of it. But power, either religious or civil, bath — a natural tendency to lead the mind from the — humility, meekness and simplicity of a trul. Christian spirit, and therefore never helps for- ward, and seldom fails of retarding, in a less or greater degree, a religious progress, and requires in those clothed therewith great circumspection.” David Cooper’s unswerving uprightness as a legislator procured for him unlooked for respect, rendered his seat a much more easy one, and abundantly illustrated the proverb that ‘“‘ honesty is the best policy.” The “resolutions” above referred to, may be rofitable to others who are called to like respon- sibility. After a preamble which rehearses the circumstances by which he was involuntarily called into public life, he proceeds: “ Well, I am resolved to act the part of an honest man. I have nothing to hope or to fear. I will court no man’s smiles, nor fear his frowns. If this course gain me the former, it will please,—if the latter, it will not disturb me. I have no private views to serve; I covet no post in any man’s gift. I am determined to study the good of my constituents, and, next to my duty to my Maker, pursue it with all my might. To be- tray the trust they have reposed in me, would be hateful to God and man. To be indolent and lukewarm comes not up to an honest man’s standard of integrity. To be timorous in pur- suing known duty bespeaks a low and servile soul. To be a dupe to great men is below hu- manity; it is for beasts of burden to cringe and obey. He deserves not the name of a Christian, 530 FRIENDS’ REVIEW. a Freeman, or an Englishman, that will, in com- plaisance to some great man’s views, give the lie to his own sense and judgment. Let him who finds anything sweet in servitude, never be en- trusted with the liberties of freemen. What has a representative of the people to fear? Nothing but God and his own conscience. He is safe while he does nothing for which his own mind reproaches him. If his upright condact shall raise him enemies, at the next turn of the road it will make them his friends. The clouds that may overeast his horizon will soon blow over ; Honesty and Virtue cannot long be hid, and those who were his enemies without reason, shall desire to be his friends, when they see that his integrity cannot be shaken. I will not wil- fully give offence, but ifan independent exercise of my judgment incur it, I will despise the an- ger and pity the man; for it is my fixed resolu- tion to believe no man’s senses in violation of my own. Whilst I act up to these maxims, whether I have the smiles or the frowns of men, they’ll give me what is infinitely more desira- ble:—bosom-peace, the approbation of my econ- seience. This is fruit the most delicious, and at the same time cheap and easy to obtain. Its reverse requires much labor and eraft to make a man pass for sterling when he’s only a base counterfeit ; and his only reward, bosom-torment, and the bitter reproaches of conscience. ‘¢The honest man’s path lies open. He has only to use his eyes and step forward. The path of the knave is obscure and intricate, and its endless turnings and windings constantly tax his art and eunning. May I ever travel the just man’s path, whieh is indeed a way of pleasant- ness, along whose borders may be gathered the fruits of Pkace. And when an opportunity shall present to be dismissed from this slippery stage, I will step off with pleasure, and joyfully proclaim myself ““« Studious of ease and fond of humble things, Beneath the smiles, beneath the frowns of kings, Content to live, content to die unknown, Lord of myself, accountable to none.’” On First-day morning, Fourth month 18th, 1762, David Cooper and all his family except his son William, (under 4 years of age,) and a servant lad, were quietly gathered at Woodbury meeting, when, near the close, some one burst open the door and called aloud: “ David Cooper’s house is on fire!” The subject of our memoir was soon on horse-back, riding home- ward with speed. Meeting his lad, he only asked if the child was safe. He found the barn and out-houses consumed, and of his dwelling only one end standing, which fell in a few minutes. It seems that the lad, having been to alarm a neighbor, ran into the house for the child, and had just succeeded in getting him out, when, in a moment, the floor fell down. “Thus,” (continues the diary,) “I, who two hours before was plentifully provided with the ne- cessaries and conveniences of life, now found my- self houseless ; no clothing save what was on our backs, or mouthful of food, except some salt meat saved from the eellar. My desk, a bu- reau, a table, a few chairs, and two common beds, were all the goods that were rescued.” David Cooper had not spent that morning in the solemn assembly as an idle formalist; and he now realized the precious assuranee: ‘“ They that wait upon the Lord shall renew their strength.” As he stood, with his six little ones weeping around him, beside the blazing ruins of the home, fraught with so many fond associations, in which he had enjoyed the perfection of earthly com- munion, and where he had suffered a bereavement far keener than the loss of worldly possessions, he thought of Job,—of his strippings and res plenishings, and piously repeated aloud his lan- guage: ‘The Lord gave and the Lord hath taken away, blessed be the name of the Lord !’” He received many evidences of sympathy, which he gratefully notes, with “ considerable offers of money,” which he had not freedom to receive. “The kindness to myself and children,” he says, ‘affords a sweetness in the recollection, much of which, I believed, flowed froma pleasure many took in showing kindness to the children of a woman whom they had dearly loved. Thus do the offspring of the righteous find friends, and reap fruit from the virtues of their parents. But none demands more grateful remembrance than my sister-in-law, Margaret Haines, who has been a nursing mother to my children and steady friend to the family, which I hope will be gratefully remembered by you, my dear ehil- dren, when [ am gone.” * D. C. now made his temporary abode with his brother James, with four of his children, the other two going with their excellent aunt Mar- garet Haines, of whose exalted Christian eharac- ter some of our readers are well aware. With the hearty co-operation of his neighbors his new barn was enclosed before harvest, and soon after they moved into their dwelling, to whieh, in the spring, he made a brick addition; and in two years he was better supplied with buildings than before the fire, being ‘enabled to provide for the children without their suffering in the want of any necessary of life.’? ‘So little cause” (to quote the Diary) “have we, under strippings and gloomy prospects, to despair, or to terrify ourselves with apprehension of want. And yet, how constantly are we distrusting Providence. If your Heavenly Father clothe the lilies and feed the ravens, will he not much more provide for you, oh ye of little faith.” The subject of our memcir was a man of de- cision of character, undaunted firmness, and self-sacrificing benevolence. These traits were *Margaret Haines (daughter of Caspar Wistar), was wife of Reuben Haines, who was half-brother to David Cooper’s wife. They had the same mother. FRIENDS’ REVIEW. 531 frequently made subservient to the welfare of his fellow men, and in the exercise of them he would calmly look beyond the temporary censure, or even peril, that might be incurred. His prom- inent idea was that of Dury, and, in pursu- ance of this, he was ‘Prepared to suffer, or to do, In meekness and in self denial.’’ He relates a circumstance of some historical in- terest, which, in 1764, drew upon him much censure, not unattended with danger of his life. “There was a company of Indians at Wyo- ming, on the Susquehanna, who, from conviction in their own minds that it was wrong to kill their fellow-creatures, refused to join their peo- ple in war against the English. These Indians held regular religious meetings, in which one or two of their men sometimes preached to them; and they were called Quaker Indians. But as they could not be prevailed upon to take up the hatchet against the whites, their own people threatened to kill them as enemies, upon which, not daring to stay, they came to Phila- delphia, where were a number of other Indians, who had fled to the whites for protection from the rage of the red men. Friends, by permis- sion of government, took these Quaker Indians under their own particular care. But this act of the rulers, in protecting and maintaining Indians, at a time when others of them were at war with the whites, enraged many people, who wished to have the whole race extirpated, as the Jews destroyed the Canaanites, without re- garding whether they were friends or foes. Accordingly, (as may be seen in the narrative written by Benjamin Franklin,) an armed mob had lately broken open the prison at Lancaster, and murdered fourteen men, women, and suck- ing children, who had been lodged there by the magistrates till they could be removed to a place of greater security. A number of these people, called the Paxton boys, set off for Philadelphia in order to murder all the Indians there, at which place it was expected they would be largely reinforced, as it was believed that the leading instigators of the movement were in that city. Friends, to secure those under their care, sent them to Woodbury privately, by water, early in the lst month of this year, where two Friends, coming by land, met them, and arranged with Friends to provide for them, a few weeks, till the storm should blow over. There were twenty-four of them, chiefly women and children. Job Chilloway and his father Were natives of this place, with whom I had been well acquainted when a lad. These two, with Job’s wife and four children, I took into a house which I had, near my residence. The others were put into a school house near where they landed. I was affected at first sight of these destitute fellow creatures, (few of whom could speak a word of English,) who had fled to us for protection—and now found that their blood was thirsted after by pretended Christians —women with children at their breasts, and distress in their looks, as though they expected every stranger was to be their murderer. I thought the sight sufficient to soften into ten- derness the most cruel heart. ‘A violent ferment soon appeared among th people, far beyond what I could have believed possible for so little reason, evincing a spirit that disgraced Christianity. The militia officers having met to consult how to send them away, a few of us went to them, and endeavored to pacify them. Our efforts had some effect for the present. A proclamation issued by the gover- nor, ordering all officers to protect and defend them, increased the popular rage, and a report reached us, that a violent man, well known in the county, had undertaken to bring a force and murder them in the night, and we found that he had been to spy whether they were armed, and how he might best perform the exploit ; and for weeks the execution of the wicked plot was expected. But upon seeing their defenceless situation, the women and their babes, Xc., his heart relented, and he said he would have nothing to do with killing them. f “ After this failed, a number of these conspir- ators got to a tavern, and having a man with them who, when inflamed with liquor, was like a mad man and fitted for any wicked purpose, after carousing till past midnight, they sent off this man about ten miles to my house, armed with the militia captain’s sword and double-bar- relled gun. Reaching Woodbury, he stopped at the tavern to inquire the way. He was rec- ognized by several persons, who, seeing him thus equipped, wanted to know his business ; which he at length told them was to make David Cooper send the Indians away, or otherwise to kill him. They told him I was then in meet- ing but a few rods distant, persuading him into the house to stay till meeting was over; and, detaining him till he was partially sober, pre- vailed with him to quit his enterprize. Thus I providentially escaped that intended mischief. “The Indians, after a stay of five months, were ordered back to Philadelphia by the com- missioners who had the care of them.” a TRUE CHRISTIAN EXPERIENCE, Is not this beautiful extract from the journal of Mary, wife of Isaac Penington, worthy of a place in the Friends’ Review ? ‘“‘ Many are the trials I have met with, but as they came by the Lord’s ordering, they have not hurt me, but rather tended to strengthen me in the Divine life. Once my mind sustain- ed great hurt by running out into prejudice against some friends ; nevertheless, after a time of deep and unknown sorrow, the Lord removed this thing, gave mea clearness in His sight, FRIENDS’ REVIEW. A Religions, Literary and Miscellaneous Journal. Vout. XV. EDITED BY SAMUEL RHOADS, To whom all Communications may be addressed. PUBLISHED WEEKLY, At No. 109 N. Tenth street, Philadelphia. Price, PAYABLE IN ADVANCE, Two dollars per annum, or six copies for Ten dollars. Postage on this paper, when paid quarterly or yearly in advance, 13 cents per annum in Pennsylvania, and 26 cents per annum in. other States. For Friends’ Review. NOTICES OF DAVID COOPER. NO. VI. In letters dated in 1764, we find the first traces of a friendship with one who was much his junior, based upon congeniality that ignored the difference of years. ‘I. Hood said, speak- ing of the author of Elia, who much enjoyed the society of the young: “* Perhaps, in his fine generalizing way, he thought that, in rela- tion to eternity, we are all contemporaries.” Certain it is that there is often the highest at- tainment of intellectual communion, when the feeling of brotherhood is tempered on the one side by a paternal, on the other, by a filial re- gard,— ‘While in their age they differ, joined in heart.” Between D.C. and Samuel Allinson, a lawyer of Burlington, an intimacy sprang up, and a cor- respondence which treated upon the Stamp-act, and various matters of British and colonial legislation, philanthropy, religion and morals. Tke experience of the subject of our memoir,, as a Christian, a patriot and a legislator, was attractive to his younger friend, whilst the legal knowledge of the latter, connected with high principle and earnest piety, rendered his friend- ship both attractive and valuable to one so alert as David Cooper to serve his fellow-men. They co-operated in important public measures. D. C. having been recently ill, S. A. wrote on the occasion, and D.C. in a reply, 11 mo. 4th, 1764, says : “Thus, my friend, are our lives chequered with clouds and sunshine, and, though we have PHILADELPHIA, FIFTH MONTH 8, 1862. bitter portions allotted, when we consider that No. 85. unerring wisdom governs, we must believe it was necessary. Happy he who, under a reverent acquiescence in the dispensations of Providence, is guided in the paths of wisdom. ‘Tis he en- joys the calm of life, while others are tossed to and fro by every puff of wind. When death appears, in that hour most terrible to the un- faithful servant, he is undismayed, free from anxiety about the trifling affairs of time, his thoughts participate the joys of the blessed,— ‘The soul’s calm sunshine and the heartfelt joy © Which nothing earthly gives or can destroy.’”’ Alluding in the same letter to the prospective second marriage of his brother James, he ex- presses the wish “that he may,witness, in its highest degree, the happiness that state af- fords ;” continuing, with pensive pleasantry, after referring to his correspondent’s celibacy, “a happiness, ’tis true, of which a bachelor can have but a faint idea. Yet, if our pleasures con- sist more in pursuit than possession, in antici- pation than realization, he may, for aught I know, be the happier man. For, though he has not tasted the sweets flowing from such an union of soul, neither has he of the corroding bitters of separation ; and here, perhaps, a brief sub- lime happiness may shadow the remainder of life. Experience alone can teach us ‘ After rapture, anguish how severe !’ For misfortune bears proportion to the happi- ness lost. The torments of fallen angels were augmented by their having known a happier state. It is a pinching situation, my friend, when retrospect induces the pathetic language : ‘Qh, that it were with me as in days past!’ Alas, how frail all earthly happiness! It con- sists in society, and the more numerous and dear our connections, the greater our disquietude in fear of and at the severance which must inevitably happen.” To the same friend he writes, Ist mo., 1766: ‘¢T presume thou hast heard of our late elec- tion continuing three days with great warmth, and not 60 votes given.” A From their correspondence we shall be spar- ing in extracts, as they would too much swell these notices, and might more appropriately be- 546 long to a memoir of Samuel Allinson. The certificate of his marriage, 4th mo. 25th, 1765, with Elizabeth, daughter of Robert and Eliza- beth Smith, now lying before me, would be at- tractive to the collector of autographs. The first signature is that of Wm. Franklin, Governor of N. J.; Charles Read, Secretary, and other state officials follow, and Friends whose names are still as ointment poured forth; for instance, —Mordecai Yarnall, Peter Worrall, George, Sarah and Wm. Dillwyn, John Smith, John and Thos. Seattergood, Samuel Smith the his- torian, his sister Elizabeth, who is chronicled as “a pattern of modest virtue.” A number of names are appended of Friends, active alike in church and State, who, not finding their posi- tion as cross-bearing Quakers to exonerate them from the full responsibility of citizens, subjected their virtue to the severe test of public life, and proved, to the glory of their blessed Leader, that His grace was sufficient for them. These -were Christian patriots, and they made their mark for goud upon their generation. Loving the memory, moving in the very haunts of Wm. Penn, Samuel Jennings, &c., they did not hesi- tate to go, carrying their Quakerism with them, to places where communities might be bene- fited by the application of their principles. Never doffing their consistency, nor deeming that it needed for its protection the cloak of isolation, they, felt that, as integral parts of the: nation, they should promote the righteousness which would exalt it, and do all they could to lessen the aggregate of sin which “‘is a disgrace to any people.” The very attrition with the world observable in Friends of that day, may have helped to preserve the Church from stag- nation, and the yearning to extend their prin- ciples among others may. have checked the growth of disunity among themselves and jeal- ousy towards one another. The candle placed under a bushel not merely fails to give light to those around, but it naturally dims with its smoke, if it does not consume, the enclosure which cireumscribes its shining. Happy he who, being permitted to walk in the seclusion of private life, is enabled to keep his own spir- it, and, innocent of the blood of all men, to pass onward to his rest. Yet not to these does Gabriel’s promise to Daniel, ‘They shall shine as the stars,” apply so emphatically as to those worthies who beautifully illustrated the Sa- viour’s command, ‘‘ Let your light so shine be- fore men, that others seeing your good works, shall glorify your Father who is in heaven.” About this time, the subject of horse-racing, in which amusement many prominent persons were engaged, claimed the serious attention of §. A. and D. C.,and the former in writing upon it, after some striking observations, continues: ‘“‘ Perhaps I may be a little severe upon this darling folly, having seen and felt much more than I can say during my last journey, in sever- FRIENDS’ REVIEW. al companies of this class; but although I re. fused\to mix in the chase, I could not well avoid the stupidity that ensued it. My bare de- clining their sport often occasioned a declaration of its innocency, and that such and such per- sons of our Society were once very fond of it. This shewed me the expediency of being ever careful of our conduct, that we may notstrength- en wrong practices, and hurt others of our pro- fession who cannot give themselves such liber-— ties; which is well expressed by the wise man: ‘Keep thy heart with all diligence, for out of it are the issues of life.’”’ We are here remind- ed of the excellent Theodore Frelinghuysen, (very recently deceased,) who, in a speech be- fore a convention, at which the Governor, and many of the legislators of New Jersey were in attendanee, alluded to the Trenton race-course, ‘“‘ which,” said he, “‘ is opposite to your peniten- tiary, and which fits men for tt.” < aeligyat D. Cooper, in his reply to S. Allinson, says: “ Thy pertinent remarks on licentious pleasures, did me real good, serious thoughts being very unfashionable in this day of dissipation, not- withstanding they are the soil whereon virtue grows, and never fail to leave a tincture of sweetness behind them. Let my friend dare to pursue the paths of virtue, nor ever deviate therefrom. Though we stand alone, our reward is sure: Peace here, and hereafter happiness without end.” But, whilst he could thus look forward with “hope that was more than hope,” his widowed heart, unchangingly true to its ehosen partner, still, after a lapse of seven years, felt the shadow of his great bereavement. On the birth of his correspondent’s first child, William Allinson, D. C. writes to him, 5th month 11th, 1766: — “T received thine of the 29th past, and sin- cerely congratulate thee under the joys of the day, and as sincerely wish they may be con- tinued; that many days of conjugal felicity in asa high a degree as thou now enjoyest, may be thy lot. A greater earthly blessing I cannot wish thee. But, my friend, under the pleasing present, it is necessary to remember the uncer- tain future ; under the smiles of fortune to bear in mind the fluctuating constitution of things, and not presume too much on the pleasures of to-morrow,—alas ! how uncertain! How oft is a lovely morning succeeded by alarming tem- pests ; how are the most serene moments inter- rupted by tremendous earthquakes. While ex- ulting hope flatters that we are greatly short of our meridian joys,—the sun sets, and we are eD- tombed in woe! Dost thou tell me such gloomy doctrine at this time is like snow in harvest? Blame thyself ; thy words called to mind a like golden period, nor could my eyes refrain a briny tribute. And serious thoughts are very useful - under smiling seasons, being sweet incense to the Giver, and like a wholesome regimen may render unnecessary the severer treatment of the FRIENDS’ REVIEW. 547 Great Physician. best love to Betsy.” A father’s tenderness, perhaps a father’s par- tiality, is stamped upon the record he makes of a fresh bereavement. ; “My youngest child, William, who was fh arms when he lost his mother, having entered his tenth year, discovered much of her disposi- tion, lively and active, yet sweet and obliging; he was the darling of the whole family. He was indeed a singular child, so careful to ob- serve instruction, and to avoid everything he thought wrong, that I seldom had occasion to reprove him. ‘To please me, and to observe everything I said to him, was so natural that he seemed not to know he could do otherwise ; and if I could have it for asking, I knew not anything in his temper and disposition I could wish altered. The dawning of his mother’s en- dowments in such an infant mind, raised wy expectations, and made him exceedingly dear tome. But alas! in him I was taught how vain to promise ourselves comfort in earth] enjoyments. In the 10th month, 1767, whilst I was absent from home, he was taken ill. He often inquired for his dear father. On my re- turn, [ found him very low, and in the evening of the 20th he ceased to breathe. The loss of this child, in whom I had fondly imagined his dear mother’s excellencies were intended to be continued to me, seemed to touch my heart as closely as anything I had yet met with.” The care of his five remaining children, vary- ing in their mental traits, caused him much ex- ercise and deep reflection, of which there are instructive traces in his memoranda. He was anxious to steer between austere restriction and foolish indulgence, and to guard their innocence, and secure their virtue, rather than to indulge their pride or his own. ‘ With my daughters” he says, “it was an invariable rule to know where they were going, and though they might, at the time, take this hardly, I believe at riper age they have seen it in a different light, and had cause to be thankful for the care.”” Givea double portion of my “T know of nothing more acceptable to God, nor more useful, instructive and strengthening to the souls of men, than true silent worship and waiting on God for help immediately from his holy presence; nor of scarcely anything more formal and lifeless than that dull, unfeeling silence, which too many of our Society are sat- isfying themselves with,—the year round, and from year to year. Qh! it is the life, the life, that is the thing ! and this is too little witnessed or even rightly waited for by many. Some are not content with such vocal services as God, by his holy spirit, quickens and immediately quali- fies for the performance of ; but are busily and zealously doing a great deal of themselves, and in their own puttings forth: all which brings thee? follow thou me.” them not a whit nearer to God, nor further on in the true Christian experience and stability. Others who see this pretty clearly to be so, are yet sitting at ease, in a state as little profitable to themselves as others. They see through the emptiness of many outward performances, and creaturely exertions; and therefore suppose themselves much more refined and nearer the true and spiritual worship; and yet scarcely know anything of that burial by ‘baptism into. death’ with Christ, and that rising with Him, and in Him, in ‘the newness of life,’ wherein alone true gospel worship, in spirit and in truth, is performed. : No possible per- formances in the oldness of the letter, and in creaturely ability, will do. It is only in the fresh spring of Divine life, and under its. quickening influence, that any of our duties and obedience finds full acceptance with God, or advances us in substantial knowledge and good- ness.”—Job Scott. WAR AND CHRISTIANITY. BY W. ROWNTREE. (Continued from page 584.) ; It is very common to enquire, “ What would you do in case of invasion?” It might seem enough to say to the individual Christian,—for it is these that I address,—‘“‘ What is that to John xxi. 22. It has been said, “Duty is ours, events are God’s.” But even in the present state of the world, how rarely would quarrels between nations occur, if statesmen and people showed as much anxiety to settle their differences in the light of reason and truth, as they do, when misunderstandings arise, to excite feelings of irritation and distrust; if an attempt were made to earry into practice the golden rule of doing to others as we would that they should do unto us. How many breaches have been healed during the present century, when, if differences had had to be settled by mili- _ tary law only, and by the partisans of a too often venal press, war and bloodshed would have been the result! Ein, Have not we seen in the present day that every species of misrepresentation and reproach has been heaped on the head of a neighboring monarch, . if it were the very object of the writers to provoke a sanguinary war? There is fat present a lull in the storm; how soon it may again be lashed into fury by the unscrupulous use of the same weapons no one can foresee ; but so long as Englishmen allow themselves to be duped, and their passions inflamed by hireling and interested writers, that time is not far dis- tant. Every feeling of irritation, of jealousy, and revenge, was stirred up previous to the Russian war; for it was well known that, in its sober reason, the nation would never have engaged in that war at all; misrepresentation of every kind was employed, and facts were garbled and per- verted. 562 FRIENDS’ few months, might lead to a still larger measure of health, and that a life so dear to his friends, and so useful to a large circle of his fellow- townsmen, and the members of the First-day school, might be prolonged. Previously to commencing his journey, he paid what proved to be a parting visit to his beloved brother and sister at York, and to others there who loved him well. From York, he went to visit his uncle and aunt at Lomeshaye. On the 14th of Second month, he addressed a letter to the men of his Sabbath class at Settle. In it he remarks on the number of recent deaths: —‘‘ These,’”’ he says, “ought to make the most careless of us give heed to the warning of our blessed Lord, ‘Be ye also ready, for in such an hour as ye think not the Son of man cometh.’ How much happier must those be, and how much more must they enjoy life who are able to look for- ward to that solemn time without fear, knowing that their sins are forgiven them for His name’s sake, who loved us and gave himself for us,— only they can say with David, ‘ Yea, though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I will fear no evil, for thou art with me.” Little did our dear young friend deem that he was on the very slope leading down to that val- ley, happily not dark to him. On Sixth-day, the 15th, he once more, and for the last time, employed his pen. It was for a beloved friend, an old school-fellow. The following extract will show how love for his divine Master and his Master’s service had the uppermost place in his heart. “T often think what a blessed thing it would be if several of us young Friends were to devote ourselves to the foreign mission work. ‘ Look around you and behold that the fields are white to the harvest, but the laborers are few, pray ye therefore the Lord of the harvest that He would send forth laborers into his harvest.’ Must not we, while praying that laborers may by Him be raised up, fitted, and sent forth, be ourselves willing to yield ourselves to the call, and even pray God that, if He saw meet, He would send us forth ‘to preach the cross in the regions be- ond.’ Do not the words ‘ go ye’ apply to us as wellas to the disciples? I think I could re- joice to go forth ‘ called of God,’ when His own time was come; but do, my dear friend, tell me thy thoughts and feelings on this vitally impor- tant subject. ‘Then they that loved the Lord spake often one to another.’ ‘Every one that hath forsaken houses, or brethren, or sisters, or father, or mother, or wife, or children, or lands, for my name’s sake, shall receive an hun- dred-fold more in this present time, and shall inherit everlasting life.’ Is it nota glorious promise? ; On the evening of this day he became more unwell. The following day he was worse. Medical skill and the tenderest care of loving REVIEW. relatives availed not to arrest the progress of disease. On the morving of the 17th his aunt, who bad watched over him during his last night of suffering, whispered to the departing spirit, “we think thou art soon going to Jesus,” With a look of surprise and heavenly joy, he responded, “Am I going?’ Then clasping his hands, added, “‘O blessed Jesus!” The name of his Saviour was the last sweet sound that escaped his lips. An expression of unspeakable © happiness irradiated his countenance, and left its impress there, even when his emancipated and ransomed spirit had entered that city, none of whose inhabitants shall ever say, ‘‘ I am sick;” and the people that dwell therein are forgiven their iniquities. ' 3 So rapid was the progress of illness, that his tenderly beloved mother did not arrive till the spirit of her darling son had passed away. ‘ Sa eae His remains were removed to his father’s house at Settle, and, on the morning of the 22d, were borne by relays of the men of his Sabbath Class to their last quiet resting place, close by the scene of his faithful First-ay labors. ; We conclude our brief narrative in the lan- guage of the memoir to which we have already referred. “To some, long years of earthly ser- vice are appointed by their Lord; sustained by his grace, from year to year, they proclaim to their fellow-sinners the good tidings of reconcilia- tion, pardon, and peace through the blood of the Cross, till at last, ‘they come to the grave in a full age, like as a shock of corn cometh in in his season.’ To others, as with our beloved R. E. T., it is permitted to preach by early dedica- tion and early death; and by these, he ‘ being dead, yet speaketh.’ To us who remain a little longer, the watch-words are; ‘Oceupy till I come.’ ‘Work while it is day—the night cometh when no man can work.’ ‘Let your loins be girded about, and your lights burning, and ye yourselves like unto men that wait for their Lord.’” For Friends’ Review. NOTICES OF DAVID COOPER. | ree NO. VII. In a letter to Samuel Allinson, First month Zist, 1768, after warm passages of private friendship, D. C. thus alludes to the political troubles foreshadowing the rupture with Great Britain. 3 ‘As to the proceedings of the Eastern Pro- vinces, I condemn their parade and noise ex- ceedingly. But really, in my view, we seem to have this single alternative; either to put their resolutions into practice, or entail distress on our posterity. For, to have the British superfluities and articles of luxury poured in upon us in the manner they have been for some time past, is & FRIENDS’ REVIEW. 563 burthen these Provinces cannot bear. We must either lighten the load or sink under it; and 1 can see but two ways of doing this; either by confining our purchases to’ bare necessaries, or suffering our money to drain so bare that ne- cessity may effect what prudence I fear will prove too feeble toaccomplish. This latter will undoubtedly ruin some, and distress many, yet it looks to me a calamity vastly inferior to what must inevitably ensue, unless a change of meas- ures takes place. For as to the increasing of our paper money, I consider it as a stupifying dose, that may serve to keep us insensible of the con- sumption that is preying upon our vitals, until the disorder shall get beyond the reach of cura- tives. For whenever the trade of any State costs a large balance against her, she must, sooner or later, inevitably sink. Thus a farmer who buys more than what he sells will pay for, though he may support himself by borrowing money or mortgaging his land for a time, his farm must at last pay the reckoning. To give thee my sentiments respecting, and objections to, a currency that is not to be a legal tender, would swell beyond the bounds of a letter, so I reserve it for a verbal opportunity, only saying that I think the scheme big with mischief, and that I dread the consequences.” Of the correctness of the last sentiment, the compiler of these notices has ample evidence, as he glances his eye upon piles of such currency, ouce of large value, which, notwithstanding the portentous warning upon the coarse wood cuts: ‘Tis death to counterfeit,’ became value- less in the possession of the recipient of the above views. The proceeds of a large sale of real estate have now no value save to the anti- quarian. The notes before me bear the imprint of sundry printers: as B. Franklin, B. Franklin and D. Hall, Hall and Sellers, Isaae Collins, James Adams, James Parker, (Woodbridge, N. J.) A. C. and W. Green (Annapolis), &c., and vary in amount from four-pence to five-pounds,and in date from 1757 to 1776. Among many in- teresting autograph signatures to these bills, are those of Luke Morris, Chas. Thomson, Owen Jones, Wm. Wistar, Richard Wistar, Samuel and Wm. Fisher, Isaac Wharton, G. Emlen, John Warder, Benj. Morgan, Jos. Pemberton, John Morton, Abel Evans, Joel Evans, Jno. Mifflin, Samuel Coates, Robert Smith, Mor- decai Lewis, and the eccentric James Craft. Among the individual issues is one for six-pence, bearing the signature of Wm. Cooper, founder of Cooperstown, Otsego Co., N. Y., more widely known by his fictitious name of Judge Temple. He was father to J. Fennimore Cooper, of lite- rary celebrity. x The depreciation of continental money, al- though rapid, was subjected to oceasional fluctua- tions by gambling speculators, but S. A., sensi- ble that it had no real value, would not com- promise his integrity by involving others in loss to save himself. On the first of 3d mo. 1777, | two and a half dollars in continental money were worth but $1.00 in specie. At tke close of that year the value was four toone. At the close of 1778, the value was seven to one. During 1779, the downward tendency was fearful, with occasion- al delusive fluctuations, till the year 1780 opened with a value of 36 to 1. We will spare the reader a full list, and finish with a few quotations. Feb. 6th, 46 toone. | March 20th, 60 tol : 10th, 47 “ BOM, or te 12th,49 <«“ April 20th,60 “ at 18th, 50 “ July 15th,65 “ 28th, 52 “- 24th, 68.“ March 4th, 55 “ Ane: ist, fame on Co BD. pee We pass over various letters which may be more in place in another memoir. On the 22d day of 8th month, 1768, D. C.’s friend, Samuel Allinson, met with a double bereavement. His widowed mother, Elizabeth Allinson (daughter of Thomas and Phebe Scattergood), and his wife Elizabeth Allinson, (daughter of Robert and Elizabeth Smith), both died at his house on the above date, and were buried in the same grave. The KE. A. last named left two children, William and Mary, who were both through long life use- ful servants and honored Elders in the church. By frequent passages of correspondence it is evident that H. A. was the intimate friend of David Cooper’s eldest daughter, and our narra- tive in due course will show that a friendship which, on 8. A.’s part, was riveted by many dear associations, ripened into a closer union. The following lines written on the death of Elizabeth Allinson, by her brother Daniel Smith,* will possess an interest for some of our readers, being only one of various poems which evinced the deep emotion caused by her removal. “‘ From earth removed, how happy they Who rest in calm repose ; . Have seen the morn of that blessed day On which no tempest blows ; " Helped by their Saviour’s friendly hand Have passed their troubles here, Have joined the loved selected band, And feel each other near! Those ruffling cares we mortals know Reach not where they reside ; There envy’s gall does not o’erflow, Impotent, restless pride. With minds enlarged, no records now They keep of suffered wrongs ; But grateful to their Saviour bow, And, gladdened, chant his songs. At Heavenarrived (thrice happy they), There find love’s sweet repose, And hail the morn of that blest day On which no tempest blows.” Turning from other documents, we resume * Father of Joshua R. Smith, of Robert (the editor), George D., Benjamin, &c., &c. 564 FRIENDS’ the diary of D. C. “In the 5th month, 1772, in company with Wm. Foster and his daughter Phebe, and my daughter Martha, I attended Flushing Yearly Meeting on Long Island. A Quarterly Meeting was held on Sixth-day, the Meeting of Ministers and Elders on Seventh-day morning, and the Yearly Meeting opened in the afternoon, and concluded the next Third-day.. Samuel Neale, from Ireland, was present, also David Ferris, Mark Reeve and Richard Wood, [the future husband of D. C.’s daughter Ann], as also two women who had certificates to travel to New England, but were advised to return home, which I think they did.” It is singu- lar that in the Journal of S. Neale his attend- ance of this Yearly Meeting is omitted. It ap- pears to have been rather a low time. The number of Quarterly Meetings was only three. One of these, and one Monthly Meeting in an- other Quarter, had refused to answer the queries, from the time of their adoption a few years pre- vious. The subject was now firmly taken in hand, and next year all the inferior meetings met the requirements of good order. On the day following the close of the Yearly Meeting, the Monthly Meeting. was held at New York, and D. C. was instrumental in settling a case of difficulty which had caused embarrassment for a long time. ‘“ We lodged in York,” he says: ‘‘a brother of my wife residing there, next morning started homeward, reaching Stony Brook at night, and the following day we ar- rived at our home, much spent by riding.” About this time Paul, his second:son, having a passion for the sea, made a voyage to the West Indies. Some time after his return, “he in- formed me that he had a desire to follow the sea, but would not leave me without my con- sent; that he had an aversion to farming, and thought it would be best to be improving in a business he expected to follow. I placed him with a merchant in Philadelphia, who sent him to sea, and soon after he became of age, the dif- ficulties of trade increasing, he returned home, to wait until times should be more settled.’ é “Tn the fall of this year, (1772), my eldest son Amos} married.” On the 29th of Ist mo. 1773, Martha Cooper, his eldest daughter, was married to Samuel Allinson, attorney-at-law in Burlington. Her father notes that her leaving him wasa renewed bereavement. ‘She had been my housekeeper for above ten years. In the fore part, of the time she was a young mistress (only 14 years of age) to have the care of my family, which com- prised three brothers and two sisters, all oer than herself; but they lived in much armony. She has been a dutiful and affectionate daughter, ever careful to avoid what might of- * White Matlack. + He has left numerous descendants about Wood- bury, &c. REVIEW. fend or grieve me, which had rendered her very dear to me, and ts an earnest cesta spat her happiness might be increased by partin this I aed to promote byte as from time to time presented tomy mind.” Of this paternal solicitude beautiful evidence is given in the following letter, which, after the lapse of about fourscore years, may stil with edification. eae “D. ©. ro MARTHA ALLINSON. eee Woodbury, 3d month 23d, 1773. “ Remembering thee this morning with parental affection, I am led to desire thy present and future happiness, and some hints occurred which, I believe, if properly attended to, may conduce thereto. \ And first, as to religion, without which it is in vain to expect happiness either here or hereafter, let it have the chief place in thy heart. I mean real religion, not a ceremonious attend- ance of meetings, and talking of God and godli- ness; in this the Pharisees, (to whom publi- eans and harlots were preferred), were the most zealous; but a religion that reforms the crea- ture ; regulates the passions, appetites and de- sires; shines forth in a steady, uniform, con- sistent conduct in every act of life ; teaches to be more careful to please God than man, re- strains from doing an ill thing, however secret, as much as if the whole world were witnesses; —this religion will silence our fears, sweeten our last moments, and enable us to triumph over death and the grave. A man who lives thus is calm and easy in himself, leaning on Providence, with a well grounded assurance that he who governs the whole of things will so far bless his — endeavors, both inward and outward, as may be most for his good. There is a strong tower into which the righteous flee and are safe, amidst the jarring of elements and of men, and the most terrific appearances. But the unhappiness is, that too many seem to place their dependence on words and works and outward appearance, and in these are extremely exact, while, alas! re- ligion is quite another thing. Its residence is in the heart. When thatis made clean, all else is but trifling in comparison in the sight of In- finite Wisdom. The love of God enobles and enlarges the mind, enables us to estimate things proportionate to their worth, raises above the feeble, childish state which is unsettled by the whims and conceits of others, which endeavors to conform to what this or the other very good friend advises to: on the contrary, it teaches us to see, weigh and consider for ourselves, and to act from the conviction of our own minds. This is the principle which ought to govern us through life. “Thou art in the difficult station of a step- mother. I have not the least doubt of thy anxious desire to avoid just censure, but I fear that this may lead thee into a conduct that may draw it upon thee. Wisdom ever teaches FRIENDS’ that in adopting rules of life, as also in partic- ular actions, we should look forward to conse- quences. continued at a future day. Now is the time to establish the habit of being obeyed : that in their father’s absence thy commands are not to be dis- puted. This is easily accomplished now ; not so hereafter. With this point always in view, cherish and fix their Jove, for this and this only can secure thee from the malicious tongues of. whisperers who are so busy: but by an unlim- ited indulgence now, every future restraint, how- ever reasonable, will be ascribed toa step-mother’s severity. If they commit considerable faults, inform their father in the offender’s presence. The exacting of strict obedience is so important, that without it no head of a family can support the station with peace and satisfaction. “Friendship affords the sweetest joys of life, but false friends occasion the most grievous bitters ; and the greater the intimacy, the deeper they can wound us. Youth is incautious and apt to confide: age is taught by experience the necessity of caution, of guarding, under the most plausible appearances, against insincerity, and of being doubly careful among strangers, in whom they repose confidence. Let this, my dear child, teach thee to observe the precept : ‘ Be civil to all, intimate with few.’ “Seek not much company. It isnot only ex- pensive and interrupting to family affairs, but attended with many snares. True happiness is of a retired nature, loves shade and solitude, is an enemy to pomp, glitter and noise. It is found in the enjoyment of one’s self, or, in other words, the possession of a calm and sound mind, and the society of a few true friends. Having this treasure at home, there’s nothing equally pleasing to be sought for abroad, and so far from being augmented by a*multitude of witnesses it is destroyed or suspended thereby. “ However contemptible a conceited disposi- tion appears, he who does not show a proper re- gard for himself will receive but little from others: nor do I consider this incompatible with that great Christian virtue, humility. With re- gard to religion, and in reference to our Creator, we can hardly estimate ourselves too low: but with regard to our fellow men, if we do not sup- port our station and rank, we relinquish our claim to their respect and esteem, and in ex- change receive their slight and contempt. Reverence thyself, is a precept in the golden verses: and then, saith Dr. Young, the world’s reverence will follow. Think not, my child, these remarks are the produce of hasty thought. They are the result of many years’ experience and observation, and are hints to lead thee to a train of thinking which :induce observations of thy own far beyond what is here contained, and thus their Thy husband’s children: appear of] disposition not hard to govern, but let not this] lead thee into indulgence that will not bear to be’ REVIEW. 565, effect may be felt when the present writer is gone and forgotten.” WAR AND CHRISTIANITY. BY W. ROWNTREE. * (Continued from page 449.) Ee Christian men and women! does not your blood run cold atatrocities like these? at listen- ing to these horrible details; to be told that these dreadful scenes are the natural concomi- tants of war; that the pillaging of the bodies and the houses of the wretched sufferers, is one of the agreeable occupations of the soldier ;° and that he anticipates, with savage delight, similar. scenes in campaigns that are before him! — And why do I give these sickening details? Not certainly to harrow your feelings, but to give you a glimpse, though a very faint one, of what war really is! for truly a tithe has not been told! I have but very slightly raised the cur- tain that conceals this aceldama of human woe! What I have shown is but as the faintest shadow to the living substance: the reality is such as sickens the heart even of the conqueror to look upon. And it is because I am persuaded, that if you could look for one moment on the car- nage of the battle field—if you could realise to your minds but a fraction of the misery and the woe that reign there—could you but listen to the cries of the widow and her fatherless childrea— that so long as a human heart beats in your bosom, you would resolve to take no part in in- famy so foul! . May He who isa God of mercy and of love, so influence your hearts this night, that you will solemnly vow unto Him, that henceforth, through his grace, come what may, you will neither by your person, your money, nor your influence, sanction the horrid trade of war—that you will no longer seek to shield its enormities, by associating it with the name and the religion of Jesus of Nazareth,—but that you willon every occasion, vindicate the honor of His name, from any participation in these scenes of cruelty, of carnage, and of blood ! Previous to the outbreak of the Russian war, an eloquent and popular orator, and who, in his place in Parliament, had borne a powerful and indignant protest against that war, was invited to try to allay the feelings of national irritation, by addressing bodies of his countrymen on the subject ; his reply was that, though it might do good, it would not stop the war. Not so, however, had the ministers of the Gospel invariably ranged themselves on the side of conciliation and peace! Were they, true to their calling, to raise their voice against oppression and wrong; to preach the spirit of meekness, forbearance, and love; to strive to soothe the irritated feel- ings of their hearers, rather than, as is too often the case, add fuel to the flame of discord and of strife; were they to proclaim the truth that — God has made of one blood all nations of men FRIENDS’ REVIEW. A Religious, Literary and Miscellaneous Sournal, Vor. XV. PHILADELPHIA, FIFTH MONTH 17, 1862. No. 87. ~~ EDITED BY SAMUEL RHOADS, To whom all Communications may be addressed. PUBLISHED WEEKLY, At No. 109 N. Tenth street, Philadelphia. Price, PAYABLE IN ADVANCE, Two dollars per annum, or six copies for Ten dollars. Postage on this paper, when paid quarterly or yearly in advance, 13 cents per annum in Pennsylvania, and 26 cents per annum in other States. 4 _ For Friends’ Review. "NOTICES OF DAVID COOPER. P NO. VIII. “In the 4th mo., 1774, I went with my son- in-law, Samuel Allinson, to Shrewsbury, to re# deem a family of negroes with money, to the amount of about £500, left by a kinsman of theirs who, dying in a Friend’s family, this estate fell under his care. He requested the advice of Friends, and the subject went through the dif- ferent meetings; up to New York Yearly Meet- ing, where it was referred to the Meeting for Sufferings. The Yearly Meeting had advised that some Friend should administer on the estate and redeem the whole family. After lying about five years in these two meetings, and | much pains having been taken without effect to prevail with some Friend of Shrewsbury to en- vage in it, I was induced by the Meeting for Sufferings to undertake it so far as to subject my estate to the consequent risk, which was the only pretence for refusal, expecting Friends of that place to take the necessary care of them vhen freed. We attended their Quarterly Meet- ing, when my son-in-law united in the business, and a minute was made, appointing a committee to take charge of the negroes when their free- dom should be secured,—which we accom- plished. The subjects of concern were a woman and five children. After this, the woman and ason not two years old went to York, where, both being taken with smallpox, she died, and the child, through neglect, lost the use of one arm and leg. We soon found the committee did not intend to concern themselves in the affair, we therefore had him brought to Burlington, and thence to my house. Endeavors were used for his help, but to little effect. In the spring of 1781 he was taken to the hospital in Phil- adelphia, but there appears no prospect of help therefrom. Much trouble we have had with this family, and are likely to have much more ; but as our motive was charitable and purely dis- interested, I believe it must meet the approba- tion of Heaven.”’ is Among the papers of S. Allinson, is a corres- pondence upon this subject beginning in 1772. One letter addressed to him says: “I expect we © shall report to the next Quarter, ‘ Nothing done, and perhaps. add ‘under care,’—the Quarter will recommend it back to us toforward the settlement,—we shall see no step that has not" been tried,—shall let it rest till the month pre- ceding the next Quarter,—then report again; — and so expect it to be bandied till you relieve — us.” There are not a few, who may find, in the — above circumstance, an illustration of their own experience. Those who enter upon a work of © disinterested benevolence may as well take for their motto the old adage, “ The work’s the wages ;” and when they find that those from whom they are entitled to expect aid, shrink from disagreeable or responsible service, let it — sustain them to remember that the labors of humanity which are not performed to be seen of men, are recognized by Him whose love for the most abject sufferer is greater than theirs, as done unto Him. “On the 18th of 12th mo., 1778, several cargoes of tea were destroyed at Boston bya — mob, in consequence whereof an armed force took possession of the town to enforce obedience to certain regulations of the British Parliament. _ This occasioned a Congress on behalf of all — America to assemble at Philadelphia, 9th mo. 5th, 1774. Hostilities commenced at Lexing- _ ton, on the 18th of 4th mo. 1775. George Wash- _ ington was appointed General of the American — army, 6th mo., 1775. Gen. Howe evacuated — Boston, 17th of 3d mo., 1776. Independence was declared 4th of 7th mo., 1776: and He . landed on Staten Island the 3d of the same — month, defeated the American army on Long © Island, took New York, and in the fall pursued 578 FRIENDS’ Washington through the Jerseys to Trenton. In the 12th month, many of the Hessian soldiers were stationed in Burlington county, andsome of them at Mount Holly. A force was collected at Haddonfield, which, on the 22d, drove them from thence ; on the 23d the Hessians returned reinforced, and defeated the Americans, who, with great surprise, returned to Haddonfield the same evening, supposing they were pursued, Things now looked extremely gloomy in respect to America. Washington’s army was crumbled away to almost nothing; Howe appeared to have nothing to fear, and his business seemed nearly accomplished. At this crisis he issued a proclamation, offering a pardon to all who should return to their allegiance by a specified day,—which offer great numbers embraced. In . the night of the 24th, (the day after the above defeat,) Robert Frederick Price and Isaac Mickle, the members of Assembly for Glouces- ter county, came to my house with what their saddle bags could contain, in search of some se- cure retreat, supposing themselves in imminent danger, as it was generally believed the English would soon have possession of all the Jerseys. They requested my advice whether they should take the benefit of Howe’s pardon,or gointo Penn- sylvania, thinking themselves unsafe and liable to be betrayed in the county. I let them know that although I sincerely wished them well, it was a case in which I was not free to give them counsel,—further than this, that I was well as- sured a small part of the English army dare not venture below Philadelphia, and I thought there was hardly a man in the county who would not sooner help to secure than to betray them. If Jersey was likely to be wholly sub- dued, they could then step across the river if they chose to assist the American cause, or otherwise take the benefit of the pardon; but as to my own sentiments of this contest, al- though things at present looked so unfavorable for America, it did not alter the belief in which my mind had been for some time fixed, that Providence was bringing about some greater event than only a scourge, and that, after he had humbled the people, he would establish the free- dom of America, and that she would never be again in subordination to England. I told them that although I had been careful in speaking upon this subject, I had freedom to say thus much to them: that I hoped they had used, and during thesecommotions would so use, the power they might have, as to secure peace to their own minds: that I much desired each of us, in our several stations, might be found doing the will of Him who governs the universe. This would give us fortitude to encounter every difficulty and danger that may fall to our lots. They - stayed till afternoon of next day, and appearing - more composed, returned to Woodbury, and - talked of going home and waiting to see a little further how matters would turn. After they REVIEW. were gone, on reflecting upon what had passed, I thought it might possibly be called in ques- tion hereafter, and therefore noted down the above.” se What a view is here presented of the tranquil assurance of the Christian patriot, who, whilst he could not conscientiously implicate himself in strife and bloodshed, yet loved his country, wisely scanned the signs of the times, and read — the gracious designs of Providence in connection with the birth-struggles of a nation. Happy had it been for the people of the United States bad our National and State councils been con- ducted, and the primary political movements of the townships, &c., been watched and con- trolled by men with mindsas clear and patriotism as pure and unselfish as were found in David Cooper ! re In the letters of D. Cooper to his son-in-law, Samuel Allinson, are found frequent passages of more or less historical interest. In one bearing date 12th mo. 9th, 1775, he says : ‘* These times will try many, whether they are really, as they profess, trusting wholly on that Arm which the wind and seas obey. I fear very many will find that they have greatly deceived them and are not inhabitants of that holy m where none can make afraid. I belie wisdom in these trying times to labor a |! quiet of mind wherein, only, the still small yoice is to be heard. Herein we shall find an increase of strength and confidence in fixing our trust where it ought to be ; and may be directed what is best for us to do. But if we look outward either for advice, assistance or example, it will increase weakness. The mind being turned to a wrong object, no wonder if it is led amiss. “Tf it should become necessary, my house will be cheerfully open for yours and for you. I do not feel a disposition to add much, but recom-— mend a deep attention to lay aside every weight and burthen, that so we may appear without spot or wrinkle before Him to whom no diffi- culty or distress can be too great to deliver his dependant children from. fe, Amos’ goods were all returned. He is at a loss for the cause.” ne From Moorestown, the next day, he again writes toS. A. ‘On hearing yesterday of the changeof matters, I was desirous of seeing you, and came near Rancocas Ferry, where I met James Kinsey, who told me you expected the English in Burlington this night, that the ferry boats would be moved to-day, that Pensaukin Bridge is just burnt, and those over the Ranco- cas are expected to be before night. I should have proceeded notwithstanding the first account, but concluded I should not be able to get back. I am disappointed, but hope the pleasure of seeing you will not be long withheld ; and al- though the storm looks very threatening, He who directs it can cause it to fall light or heavy, when or where he pleases. May we lean FRIENDS’ REVIEW. 579 enough on that arm, and be enabled truly to say, Thy will be done, in and by us, that so we may land safe at last, and then the lengthening of our time in this troublesome world need not be de- sired. “JT have hardly ever felt a greater flow of that love which is universal, than at this time; a large portion of which flows to you.” We resume David Cooper’s Journal. “In the beginning of the year 1776, I felt a strong draft of mind to visit the families of Friends at Stony Brook Meeting, where my mother’s relations lived; but being a private Friend, and never appointed to that service, it occasioned great reasoning, especially as I had no prospect of company from home; but it con- tinued with such strength that I mentioned it to the Monthly Meeting, in thé First month, where (which I hardly expected) a minute was freely given me for the purpose. But after this, the old discourager so filled my mind with reasonings and fears, that at times I re- solved to give out, lest I should bring a dishonor on Truth. But my gracious Master, who knew my integrity, provided meacompanion. A few days before I was to set off, being in company with John Reeve, I mentioned to him my exer- cise. He signified that he had often of late thought of that meeting, and was free to join me. He obtained a minute for the service, and we proceeded to the Monthly Meeting of Ches- terfield, and performed the anticipated service much to our satisfaction, being signally owned by the great Shepherd of Israel, in a manner I have never been more sensible of; leaving me no doubt that this concern arose in Divine counsel. We attended Burlington Monthly Meeting and came home. This instance may shew the beauty and order of moving in Divine appointment. The service lay on John Reeve : by attending to the movings of Truth in my own mind I was the means of having it accom- plished.” Attending to his religious and his domestic duties whilst the confused noises of war were heard around, he experienced in the 5th mo., 1777, a remarkable escape from death by drown- ing, having got beyond his depth after washing sheep in Mantua Creek. After he had twice sunk and thought himself beyond rescue, Peter Crim sprang in and saved him. He records the circumstance ‘‘ to commemorate the dealings of a kind Providence with us poor dependant creatures, in order to excite thankfulness for his unmerited mercies.” ‘ It occasioned,” he says, “reverent prostration of soul before Him who gave me an existence here, and thus signally continued it.” (Correction.—In No. 7 of these Notices, page 564, line 11, for “the future husband of D. C.’s daughter Ann,” read: “ Father of the future husband, &c.] — , WAR AND CHRISTIANITY. BY W. ROWNTREE. (Continued from page 567.) No one doubts the genuine piety of Sir Henry Havelock, but is this to be adduced as a justifi- cation of all that he did? Amongst other war- like engagements in India, was that of the war in Affghanistan. Whatever opinion may be en- tertained of other wars in India, there is scarce- ly any difference of opinion as regards the in- justice of that war; for, as was declared by Sir Alexander Burnes, our envoy at the court of the reigning sovereign, “‘ Dost Mahommed, at the very moment the expedition was planned, was displaying the most earnest anxiety to enter into the closest friendship and alliance with us ;”” and so unpopular was the war in India, that it is de- clared that the English residents were shocked and scandalised at it; and that the “ press” seized upon the Governor-General’s proclamation and tore it to pieces. ae Havelock sent over an account of this war, which was published in a Manchester journal, . and on which the editor remarks, that “ the horrors of war have seldom been more vividly described.” Havelock says, “ Captain Thomp- son, with the officers and men, crept down to the works, furnished with 900 pounds of powder, to blow into the air the strong barricade behind which the garrison felt secure ;” he decribes how the powder exploded, and shivered the massive barricade in pieces,—how the stormers rushed in and poured a deadly discharge at half pistol shot amongst the defenders,—how Captain Kershaw passed his drawn sabre through the body of an Affghan, and how Brigadier Sale then cleft his scull from the crown to the eye- brows ; and how, amid the flight of fugitives, and the cries of the shrieking women of the harem, the colors of the 13th light infantry, and of the 19th regiment, were seen waving and flapping in the strong breeze on the Affghans’ last stronghold. And, after this success was achieved, Havelock goes on to say, “‘ The scene now excited feelings of horror, mingled with compassion, as one by one the Affghans sunk under repeated wounds upon the ground, which was strewed with bleeding, mangled, convulsed, and heaving carcasses. Here were ghastly figures stiffly stretched in calm but grim repose, —here the last breath was yielded up through clenched teeth, in attitudes of despair and de- fiance, with hard struggles and muttered excla- mations, and then a faint ‘Ue Ullah!’ (0 God!) addressed half in devotion to God, half in the way of entreaty to man, alone testified that the mangled sufferer yet lived. Theclothes of some of the dead and dying near the entrance had caught fire, and, in addition to the agony of their wounds, some were enduring the torture of bein burnt by the slow fire of their thickly. wade vests, and singed and hardened coats of shec FRIENDS’ REVIEW. 595 cost to other countries that glory may be pur- chased : the Christian, on the contrary, loves his country, and would make any sacrifice for her true honor and advancement; whilst at the same time he embraces the doctrine of universal brotherhood, and mourns over the sufferings and sorrows of his fellowman, regardless of color or of clime. And such is the force of habit and association, that I believe it to be impossible for any sincere and Christian young man to make common cause with a company of volunteers, and not have both his moral and his religious standard greatly deteriorated. Let any minister, class-leader, or reflecting member of a Christian church, but carefully watch the career of such an one as I have de- scribed, and I feel certain he could arrive at but one conclusion. The gaudy and pompous processions to our parish churches, with music and military pa- rade, when the occasion assumes all the char- acter of a gala day on the Continent, rather than the quiet and devotion of aa English Sab- bath—the ostentation and display, so little in keeping with the humility and reverence of true worship, offer, in my view, a striking illustration of what I have advanced: and yet I grieve to know that ancient ministers in a church, de- scribed by an eminent divine as exemplifying to so large an extent “ Christianity in earnest,’ and which has been instrumental in conveying the message of peace and good will to thousands of the neglected and the outcast of the land— that these have not hesitated to recommend their members to join a volunteer corps, with the as- surance that had they been young men they would have set the example. The sentiments promulgated by the press of this country, as those which should animate the British soldier, would find their counterpart in Homer or in Virgil: how these would comport with those of Wesley, of Cowper, or of Watts, we need not stop to enquire. . (To be concluded.) For Friends’ Review. NOTICES OF DAVID COOPER. rp NO. Ix. Karly in the year 1776, Samuel Allinson pub- lished his folio compilation of the Laws of New Jersey; a work attended with great labor and accomplished in the most ereditable and satis- factory manner. No collection of New Jersey Laws had been made since the year 1761. A large portion of these had become obsolete, and many repealed. The Pamphlet Laws had been from year to year published in small editions, ‘coming into the hands of only a few persons, and a complete set’ was rarely seen. It had be- come difficult to know what law was, and jury- men, magistrates, sometimes even judges were liable to be confused and imposed upon by dog- matic attornies. Great pains were taken by 8. A. to methodize the contents and to facilitate a refer- ence to every part, by tables, &c. In most cases, the titles alone were given of private, disallowed, expired, obsolete and repealed acts; sections of like character were alsoomitted. To insure ac- curacy, his compilations were made directly from the journals of the House of Representa- tives down to Ist mo. 14th, 1776. The Con- stitution of New Jersey, adopted in Provincial Congress in the same year, two days previous to the Declaration of Independence, recognizes and adopts this work in the following provision : “That all the laws of this province contained in the edition lately published by Mr. Allinson, shall be, and continue in full force, until altered by the Legislature of this colony, (such only ex- cepted as are incompatible with this charter,) and shall be, according as heretofore, regarded in all respects by all civil officers and others, the good - people of this province.” The preface to this volume is a valuable, moral and political treatise, replete with hints that might now be profitably pondered by members of Legislative bodies. David Cooper’s intimate friend, a most cherish- ed correspondent, having now become his son-in- law, and closely blended with his personal his- tory, the reader may pardon a brief episode in this memoir, more fully to introduce him. Samuel Allinson’s license as attorney bears date “November 8th, 1770.” Although a member of the Society of Friends, he had not been restricted to a course of consistency as such. Just at this important crisis in bis personal his- tory, he became the subjectof powerful religious convictions, and found himself required to ap- pear as a fool for Christ’s sake. His conflict of mind involved him in a fit of sickness, and, could — he have made his election, he would have pre- ferred the loss of life, to the humiliating test of obedience. On the occasion of his first appear- ance at the bar, he for the first time assumed the characteristic garb of a Friend. His old associates regarded him with surprise and sup- pressed ridicule; but with inherent Christian manliness he maintained his dignity, and thus permitted no man to despise him; and the very thing that appeared so humiliating was made the means of protection in various directions, and of rendering his position more easy and comfortable. I well remember, more than thirty years ago, hearing an aged citizen of Philadelphia boast that at the time of his debut he walked to court behind 8. A. and carried his books. On this occasion his antagonist pleader was his old preceptor, Judge Kinsey. This was the first of Samuel Allinson’s uninterrupted series of suc- cesses, and when Judge Kinsey was twitted with _ having reared a bird to peck out his eyes, he re- sponded that he was proud of having trained a pupil who could successfully compete with him. — Six months after his admission to the bar, he received his commission as Surrogate. One year 596 FRIENDS’ subsequently he was appointed one of the Keepers of the seal of the Supreme Court. April 4th 1765, he was appointed Clerk and Register in Chancery, (then distinct offices), which posts he resigned October 10th, 1772. In 1765 he was also appointed by Gov. Franklin “ Solicitor and Counsellor, to appear in all his Majesty’s Courts of Law and Equity.” In all his legal practice he never aaderage an unjust cause, or lent his talents for the advocacy of wrong. From this course of uprightness no fee or inducement could divert him, And more than this, when he was applied to to act in cases where litigation would be unwise and inexpedient he used his utmost persuasions, with both parties, to have the mat- ter amicably adjusted. From many thankful hearts he received, in life and after death, benisons as a peace-maker. He admired, and in the preface to his “ Laws,’ he advocated, a custom practised by the wise and good founder of Pennsylvania during his residence in that province. ‘In order,’ says he, ‘‘to prevent lawsuits, three Peace-Makers were chosen by every county court, in the nature of common arbitrators, to hear and end differences between man and man.’