June 19, 1975 / 301 ! * PEACE & FREEDOM THRU NONVIOLENT ACTION I The Vietn araizatipn of Durham, North Carolina Chicago Poet-Activist, Joffre Stewart The Housing Plight of Eastern Inclians and, Stew Albert Watches Abbie Hoffman on Ty not then there is still hope fdr Jane Alpert. In the meantime all othe¡s would be wise to tread lightly for, if she has prostituted her prinçiples and other peoples' live's to save her own, sho will do it again' I know that this is not Ms. Deming's rationalization of the mattei but then I ' suspect she is a lot bigger person than I am. as danger is in no movement The "peoples" long as there are those who believe arid love as deeply as Barbarâ Deming' _CHUCK STOTTO McAlester State Penitentiary, Oklâ. Paul Krassner in the same issue of WIN, "Be: sides,ieparatism is counter-productive and iî¡'ie.;'-'--'-"' " -- -vlcrbR coERrzEL -MILDRED GEORGE GOERTZEL Palo Alto, Calif. The 5122175 issue was excellent from front cover to back-which is not an infrequent quality in WIN, Ba¡ba¡a Deming surely is a fãminist to che¡ish. Her clarity and perspee tive and sensitivity to the human dilemma of sex typing andl the liberation of people is amazing. I am always encouraged by women who dare to be both sensitive and angry at the samg time, In her own words,-it is necessary for us to become angty enough to sometimes "turn away from men," and to "become unpossessed." This is indeed a goal th. attitude expressed by Ms' of merit, "n-d the value in a balanced perspecDemins Þuts tive. I ñope to keep finding her a¡ticles in WIN, and will keep relying on WIN for more news of action in the Feminist Movement' Though there ale the inevitable slips, the overall awareness of WIN publication is fántastic. I reallv aþpreciate being able to read a regular journal of æticles which does not insult my worth as a female pe¡son as most media \ does. -NANCY KELLER St. Joseph, Minn' Barb¿ra Deming in particular, and other ex' tremists in the "women's anti-men movement" and the "homo is better than hetero movement," taking so much space in WIN ieally distresses us. The cheap appellation 'lsexist"-if it must.be used-is more aP propriately applied to desðribe Barbara b"*ing, than it is to most'men. Her writing seems ñost inappropriate in a periodical supported by the War Resiste¡s League and prèiumably dedic¿ted to promoting love ãnd harmonious cooperation between members of the human race. Sometimes we feel we should cancel oui subscription' In the May 22 issue, Deming's confused lead article has many quotes from "feminisìs," including, for example, Ti'Grace At' kinion: "I thi;k that the neéd men have for thê role ofOppressol il the source and foundation oî ail human oppression"' Barba¡a savs "I think so, too" and later actds "I find ¡ntkinson's bookl Am¿zon truths"' Odyssey -In a book full of deep the same issue of WIN, in the liéts of recommended books, Bæbata lists ûve, all by women: similarlY Ann Davidon and Andrea Dworkiñ list only women w¡iters The problems of this world have to be solved' by people-women and men. We agree with I just read Barbara Deming's "To Fear Jane Aioert is To Fear Ourselves." Ms' Deming ùrtugfrt out a point that is well taken' There lot of movement people loosely re' "r" " to Alpert as an informer' Whether iãrring rfre it"- isn'i is not up to them to decide' As far as denouncing the Attica Ms. Deming piettv well su1mgd atolï* 'îtrat uo: "Attica is all of us." Jane Alpert has deiounced the "people" and I'm sorrynãt for mysef or my Attica Brothers bu-t iot ¡un. Alpert. All Jane Alpert can do for tn" it tiU.tuì" herself. tt appears tô me that Áìo"ti"un't evèn demystify her own politi- Bruce Nelson's letter in the May 22 issue asks how beef got to be such a'status sym' bol, anyhow? À good question, though it surprises me a little bit that you ask. I willoffèi some clues.. First, we are not as far out of ba¡barism as we like to think' When our ancestors finally lèarned cãiand s"xual experience-how can she hope to bring awareness to anYone else? shê's done that herself' Her rantines are those of the oppressor. To belong to ment-hell ñiou.m.nt ihe must identify with those in tou"."nt and they witli her' What pos sible "oeoples" movement could Alpert be want ionn to tftåt so many feminist leaders they nothing ot'-surely out her io iîto* iclentify with' Or is this what Ms' Deming ,""t mãting reference to when she quoted Ms. Shermãn's poem: "to fear you is to-- -. il;;;;;if. to hate vou is to hate mvself"' "ifr" , me'Jane Alpert and Nelbon Rockefeller the oppressor; to someone else thèv mav represent truth. i'm not ãdvocating to exclude Alpert from the human race although I believe it would be a good idea in Rockefeller's case' Jane Alpert is going through a very trying iitn" unä I believe there is hope for her but üü* is .ometfring she must work out for her' ;;;;*;i self. But create a working trust with Alpert?! Would Ms. Deming advocate a wotking trust with Nelson Rockefeller?! At this time what to any "peoples" .ooid "ontribute One of them killed 43 movement? social "ith"t men in cold blood and'the other is glad he did it because they were mçle chauvinist pigs; a ¡attle snake she has first broadcast intentions; "death to the people"-or have I misunde¡stood he¡ rantings? It is up to Susan and the \iVeather people to discern if ihL rattte snaké has 1¡et bitten anyone' If iust "her as a : even for a few daYs Yet. io real ñne human beings' ' - ltTwo is important to recognize the social of the people. I would not embr4ce "n"mv rattleinake for fear it would bite me, not because "I fear myself." At this point inJane Alpert's life she is a ¡attle snake and to cooperate with one another well enough to trap and éat animals larger ihan themsehes, thii proved to be a good supplement to the berries, nuts, and roots that had to be constantly searched for in field or forest, never ouite enough to eat, always calling for more sèa¡ching and gathering; It was great to have enough to eatior all the gang, and maybe As ior throwing Alpert out of the moye- Skip a few more thousand!1of Years and our ancestors have some fairly tame aninials that they can follow around as the animals e4t grass and h¡m it intô people'-- food-meat.-People don't thrive very well on grâss. It takes an extra stomach or so' which we just don't have. Skip a few more thousand Years and Deoole have learned to plant seed croþs fwneat, "Oatq peag beans and barley *ow" ând so on) and people didn't need io follow flocks, but could stay putif th¡V lived in places whe¡e there was enorigh rãin for itt h.tå, lean winter could be prwi{e{ with somL work and foresight, and with sood luck In bad yearg the remaining ñocks could be eaten, at least some of ihem, when there was nót enough grain to keep them all going. So standng was often avoided. A few more thousand Years and there are so many people that it may be easier io steal whât your neighbors haie stored up than to go wiihout. So people organize to orotect ihemselves from robbery, and we eet the strong mdn wíth the biggest, strongËti ftou* stoiing the food (some food) a¡d od'"iini u prn." ãf t.fttv (?) to-run-to when rn.tuoãing gtoops came to $teal and to pilrgt. sõ.] .feùdalism, in various þrms' áepending on v4rious things' Feudalism was successful enough in its day that by and by the¡e were mo¡e and more people, and the question inevitably arose as to Who gets to eat the o.nítÌulí? and, gets to hunt in the forestT (if a¡y ryho forest is left). , . You guessed it. It riras the man or family with the biggest, stronlest fortressh