tffr MOLent futiollt Jaoh 6co&.E ort Women in Spont9 a?ril 15, 1972 30f WW MarlrrJeaer on the'Naflonat blo*, J*'n Stnctair on €vcry,thing Recently WIN carriecl trvo shorts on thc subject of desertir:n. The 6rst stated that the rate tbr desertion is lar highcr than last year. Last year there were 89,088 desertions from the armcd forces. The seconcl short said that WRI has "launched an international comapign to persuade governments to give refugee status to US deserters." The short also stated that Canada, France anrl Srveden give asylum to deserters. For the past year and a haif, the immigration and political organizations dcaling rvith clraft resisters and desetters in Quebec and Canada lrave follorveil the policies that rnl:n and women can bcttcr resist the war within the US. Our rvork has centered arounri co;lnselling to gct peoplc out of the nrilitnry scrvice and advocation of organizing n,ithin the rnilitary to bring a quicker end to thc war. Norv we find tewcr and fewer clraft resisters an.l deserters corning to our centcrs. ilris dcspite the fact that more and more lnen are deserting and refusing nrilitary conscription. Wc lay this to increased consoiousncss about the war and rviilingness of brothers and sisters to break the "larv" by sheltcring "fugitives." At thc samc time, morc and morc cxiles, mcn and women, deserters and draft resisters, are returning to tire horneland. In addition, the announce.l ard unannounced presidential candidates are starting to make statements on the qucstion of amnesty. Wc think that these are att€rmpts to buy votcs on en)otional issues and attempt to break exile solidarity betwecn draft resisters and cleserters. Many exiles think that any kind of amrlesty from a presirlent ivill be filled with conditions, especially against thc dcserters. In any case, undcr the Nurentburg Rulings, exiles have done nothirrg wrong, and thereforc have nothing to be forgiven for. Canada and France do not provide asylum for deserters. In Canacla, cleserters have to go through the immigratiorl process, a process mosr cannot pass because they are from rvorking class background, young, and have l'ew job skills. Descrters in firance must renerv their work permits every few months. We lecl it would be more in keeping with political realitics if the WI{I began to promote the rcpatriation of all exiles among the people of the US without any conclitions attached. This would have thc advantage of uniting with the dcsires of the exiles themselves, of raising the consciousness of the people of the world and tlie US of how the exiles t'eel about the war and the US, and gives people a chance to make more principled actions against thc war. We are trying to move under the slogan REPATRIATE ALL EXILES _ FREE ALL POLITICAL PRISONERS. Wc wish to unite with all active duty GIs against the war, vets and other movements who wish all political exiles to return among the peoples of the LrS to continue the struggle. We think we can thereby further unite people around the 7 Point Peace Program of the Provisional Revolutionary Government of the Republic of South Vietnam, and further expose the nature of the war, holv it has affected the lives of the people of the US and who the real prisoners of the war are. In closing, tlo Chi N{inh often told the Vietr.ramese people: I-inity, unity, more unity; succoss, success, greatgr success. LAURENCE M. SVIRCHEV A\{ERICAN EXILE COUNSELLING CENTER MONTREAL, QUE. It seems to have become the custom among many radicals to call any poor or minority group person in prison a "politi- cal prisoner." I would like to suggest that this way of thinking and speaking is unwise and confusing, and will only get in the way of what radicals want to do. It is true, and has been for a long time, are criminals? Or are you saying that since there ought to be no such thing as property, there ought to be no such "crime" as "stea! ing", and that anybody should be able to take from anybody else whatever he wants, whenever he wants? Your use of "political prisoner" often to inrply, whether you mean it or not, that it is OK tbr poor peopie to commit what the law calls "crimes", that they are so much victirns of an unjust society that nothing they do can be wrong. But the effect ctf this is going to be, as it already has been, to increase what we have far too much of, namely, crimes by the poor against the poor. seems Beyond this, radicals have never made it clear, at least not to me, what they beiieve in the matter of crime and prisons. Are they talking, like some Anarchists, about a society without laws, a society in which there would be no such thing as "crime"? I suspect not. What, then, would be crinte in their society? Are they talking about a society without prisons, in which whatever the law calls "crimes" would be dealt with in another way? If so, in what ways? Where, if anywhere, are there models of such a society? Certainly ail the governments in the world of which radicals seem to approve have prisons, many of these no better than ours and otlen much worse. A1l this is not just idle picking at words. Words are important. We who arc trying, in whatever ways, to make a viable, just, peaceful, decent, and human society and world are tirst and above all teachers, makers and sharers of a vision. We must take care always to use words so that they make as clear as possible what we believe and what we want. Otherwise, we confuse, divide, and weaken our allies and ourselves' that poor people who steal cars or otherwise bqeak the law are much more likely to be put in jail than rich people who do exactly the same thing. But they still have to break the law to get put in jail. Except in the case of vagrancy laws, which ought to be and could be overturned as un-Constitutional, Here's a healthy, muncl.ry, organic snack poor people rarely get put in jailjusl for beor dessert. ing poor. If norv and then some of them do, Mix: (gobs of each, no special amounts) it is enormously important to keep a sharp unsweetened coconut, chopped nuts (almoncis, distinction between them and the poor peowalnuts), wheat germ, sesame seeds, purnpple who get put in jail because they stole a kin seeds, raisins (Thompkins are good), any car or robbed a store. Some injustices, like thing else that's around. some crimes, are worse than others, and rve should save our highest indignation for the Mix it all up in a bowl, cement together worst. with lots of honey and eat with a spoon. It's The trouble with using important words really good. -CARRIE HEMENWAY to describe things less important is that when WILLIAMSBURG, N,IA. the important thing comes along we no longer have words to talk about it. We ought to save the name "political prisoner" for the person who is in jail for what he believes, and for no other reason The trouble with A friend and rne rvent halfs on ordering calling an imprisoned car thief a political prisvour publication and l'm not sorrv about the oner is that someday, when we want to cry dea[ since I eujoy it very ntuch. l-also find it out that someone is a true political prisoner very enlightening (i especially dig your book in jail only because of his political beliefs, reviervs since I'rn able to get on to books not everyone is going to think, "Oh, they're only otherwise revierved by other sources Wow! talking about another car thief." to "Bringing it All Back" {12-1-71) Furthermore, this use of "political prisonJAMES E. SZULCZEWSKI er" does not make clear rvhat you are opposSTATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION ing and what you want instead. When a thief, AT PITTSUBRGH poor or black, is put in prison, you iue angry. Is it because rich white thieves are not put there in prison with him? Or because the poor thief was put in prison at all? Are you saylng that everyone, rich and poor, who steals a car should be put in prison? Or that no one, rich or poor, who steals a car should While it was good to see, that J.P. pays be put in prison? Or are you saying that only attention to a draft resister in Israel, probabrich white thieves should be put in prison, ly he is unaware of Israeli problems. The case and that no poor or black person should ever of Biora Newman, is not a case of conscientious objection, it is a matter of political perbe, no matter what he does? Or are you say' ing that all rich white people whould be put secution. He suffers the fate of being a memin prison whether they steal or not, that sim- ber of a socialist group, which opposes the ply by virtue of being rich and white they political aims of the state. "";'r'dll#llJ The appeal for money is peculiar. They cannot uie any money to further their cause. All is locked against them. Then if you will take the effori to examine the archives of the WRL, you will find that the Israeli comrades refused money. The lrague was willing to equip them with office machinery-they refused it, and depended on a church in Hai. fa to do their lettering. We offered to pay for a hired secretary; they declined on the basis that it would be an uncomfortable way to be paid by a foreign body. The money we them was turned over to the WRI. "savelsrael is governed by the palace Jews of the White House. The destroying of Arab houses is done after consultation with these palace Jews, so every problem in Israel is decided in New York and Washington. Our American Jewish Community is the colonial power of Isael. What we could do is ring the Israeli Consulate with a picket line. The Israeli Consulate is located at 800 Second Ave. which is a busy thoroughfare, and close to the United Nations. To bring help to our friends in Israel the only method is our picket line in this _DAVID BERKINGOFF city. BRONX, N.Y. We are looking for other PeoPle who want to leave behind the city but not the Vietnamese, who want to be less dependent on a brutal greedy system without deserting less mobile victims. ln short, we are looking for people rvho want to live in a country farm community without the usual apolitical withdrawal of such communities. We envision: buying a farm on matginal land near a small town which hosts a university or state college-raising most of our own food, grains, meat, fruit-breaking down sexbased roles in sharing all the work-several family unit living quarters (owrrer built) for privacy with a big lodge (or the original farm building) for community activities-remaining connected to political realities by opening a bookstore or underground newspaper in the small-college town-setting up a school for our own children and others who would want an alternative. If you share a vision of a farm cofiimunity that's politically relevant, please contact PEGGY & CHRIS ELMS 1 282 Chittenden Rd. San Juan Bautista I have tried so hard to be sympathetic to and supportive of your magaztne. I agree with the basic philosophies, and I have worked for 25 years in the areas ofCivil Rights and peace. As you may realue,l have been Medical Dlector of most of the youth festivals, and have been working for many yezrs to attempt to aileviate both the health problems of our young, the alienation of our young, and the buldens of war and prison imposed upon them for either philosophical, political or drug crimes. However, I was dismayed by a recent article in your magazine entitled "Kicking It: Methadone, Therapv or Revolution". The article is filled with either downright misinformation, or with absolute falsities. I would prefer to believe the former, but some of the information is so bad, that I can only conclude that your magazine is allowing people to write for it who are basically unobjective and/or dishonest. I think you should contemplate providing a worthwhile answer to this terri-' bly misleading and errotreous article' WM. ABRUZZI N{.D, WAPPINGERS FALLS, N.Y. Calif.95045 men HOME FOLKS marilyn albert beth arnold lance belville diana davies ralph di gia jen elodie leah fritz neil haworth marty jezer craig karpel peter kiger dorothy lane elliot linzer jackson maclow dick margulis david mcreynolds jim peck tad richards igal roodenko fred rosen nancy rosen STAFF maris cakars susan cakars paul johnson @@@@ 4: How to Deflate the National Bloat 9: Some Notes on Work 13: People's Garage 14: Free at Last: An Interview with John Sinclair 2 nels johnson mary mayo brian wester IN THE NURSERY janis kent cakars born march 15,1972 he weighed 6 lbs., 1O oz. IN-THE PROVINCES ruth dear (5429 s. dorchester, chicago, iil 6061s) paul encimer (7!2 w. 3rd st., duluth, minn 55806) seth foldy (2322 elandon dr., cleveland heights, ohio 44106) jim gehres (box 7477, atlanta, 9a 30309) wayne hayashi (102O kuqpohqku e4., honolulu, hi 96819) becky and paul (somewhere in 6914/ mex ico) alex knopp (3609 baring, philadelphia, pa 19104) john kyper (240 kelton st., apt. 8, alston, mass 02134) paul obluda (544 natoma, san francisco, cal 94103) lana reeves (lOl bradford st,, charleston, west virginia 25301) CL'IT! 'r1 . Women in Sports peaoe and freedom throrgh nonviolent action Ash of Death: H-Bomb Victims in M icronesia box 547 rifton, new yotk 12471 telephone 91 4-339-4585 Poems Changes WIN is published twice-monthlY except July, August, and January when it is published monthly by the WIN Publishins Empire with the support of the War Resisters League. subscriptions are $5,oO per year. Second class Postage paid at New York, N.Y. 1O0O1. lndividual writers are responsible for opinions expressed and accuracy of facts given. Sorry-manu- scripts cannot be returned unless accompanied by a self-addressed, stamped envelope. Printed in U.S.A., WIN is a member of the Underground Press Syndicate and Liberation News Service. Nam Vets "Confer" with VFW 31 : Reviews Front Cover: Nina Klymowska Back Cover: WIN Magazine, the Jack Anderson of the underground, presents yet another ripped off doc- umeni. This one courtsey of IRS. Remember! File early!l April15,1972 Volume Vlll, Number 7 3 I ,W ArtoNAI NAfl I-otpng Btt The Gross National Product of the United States is rapidly approaching one trillion dollars per year. This sum represents the total monetary value of all the services and products the country produces. lt is a basic statistic by which we measure our economic prowess and the state of our economic growth. For people who worship statistics, it's the measure of our country's greatness. lncluded in the GNP is money we spend for basic necessit.ies such as food, clothing, transportation and shelter. But in terms of social utility it is a non-discriminatory statistic. The GNP signifies the value of all financial transactions without consideration for their social purpose. The money you spend for the evening meal, for a tjcket to a baseball game, for a stay at a vacatjon resort, for the price of an electric canopener and a second or third car are all entered in the ledger of the GNP. So, too, are the pennies you lay out for this journal. The GNP has long been used as a means of compar- ing,our economic system with those of the socialist and communist nations. We take pride in the fact that our GNP is far greater than theirs. I remember in grade school this was in the late forties and early fift.ies at the height of the "Cold War"-learning from a chart about the comparatlve economic strength of our country and ihe Soviet Union. We were first in most everything and for a while, at least, it made me proud of this system. But pride always involves a certain amount of blindness. lt was many years before I began to question some of the major assumptions on which our economic system, with its hlgh growth rate and impressive statistics, is based. The economy runs on the premise that the more people spend, the more we can produce; and the more productive the industry, the more jobs there are available and the higher the average wage. The bigger our paychecks the more money we can spend. The cycle continously renews itself. On paper it seems the best of all conceivable economic ideas. Yet, there are just so many products and services that a person or a family can use to live a comfortable and a happy life; however, if people spent money on- ly on necessities the economy would fail. A decrease in demand would mean a cutback in production. lndustries would slow down, workers would be laid off, wages would drop, and money would become tight. Thus, the health of our economy is dependent on a free-spending public. Spending money has become our national duty. The role of the consumer is as patriotjc as that of a soldier. Our primary function in na- tional life is simply to buy, buy, buy. Because there is a limit to the products we need to buy, all kinds of schemes have been developed to "persuade" us to spend our money. Advertising is probably the most important. lf any industry is basic to the economy, this is it. Not only does it support much of the informational media (radio, television, magazines, newspapers, all of which would be out of business without advertising revenue), but it is the essential tool by which the system leads us blindly into the marketplace. Some of the most creative minds in the nation are occupied devision ways to cajole us into spending our money for items that we, in our dim-wittedness, would never think of buying otherwise. The technique they use is often subtle and sophisticated, employing the most advanced techniques of psychology and soci- ology. Few advertisements offer information. How many ads do you know of that tell anything factual about their products? Advertisers deal in creating salable images, in wish-fulfillment, and in appealing to our irrational selves. Advertising is designed to exploit our weaknesses and to cause us to spend money on products we rationally know we do not need. The credit system is also necessary to keep the economy going. Even with our high incomes we do not have enough spending money to keep the growth rate accelerat.ing at a desirable level. Credit cards, easy payment plans, schemes like Bank-Americard all make our designated role as consumers easier. Even if we have no cash we can still function usefully in the economic system. Of course, we all pay dearly at the end. The corporations who sponsor credit schemes all assure themselves of a profit from this service. Credit is made to look like a boon to the consumer. But the person who uses it pays double in the end, first for the convenience of buying on credit and.second for the product bought. Both transactions are included in the GNP, as are the revenues generated through the media by advertising. lf our economy functioned independent of everything else, even its absurdity would be tolerable. But our economic system forms the basis for our politics, our attitude towards the environment, and the quality of our individual and collective life styles. lt is.destructive to all three. Our trillion dollar GNP comes at the expense of the people and resources of the world; as well as our own individual happiness. With only about6% of the world's population, the United States consumes approximately two thirds of the world's'wealth. This means that most of the people of the world are working in order to keep us at the level of affluence that we have come to expect as our due. Our domination of the world's economy (which, of course, leads to politjcal domination as well) puts us at odds with the aspiratjons of the maiority of the world's people, who, quite rightly, want to control their economies and use their resources for their own purposes. Anti-Americanism is so rampant throughout the world because usually it is our corporate interests (and governmental support of those interests) that prevent the different countries from attaining economic independence. Fortunately, this is changing. The Vietnam War is a turning point in modern history, because a small thirdrate power (Vietnam) has managed (at tremendous cost to itself) to keep at bay the most powerful military machine ever assembled. ln so doing they have made it unlikely that an American President will ever again find willing conscripts to march ialist venture in some foreign land. off on an imper- During the sixties, we invaded Cuba, the Dominican Republic, and Vietnam to protect our economic interests. ln the early seventies we added Cambodia and Laos to that list. But when Chile began natlonalizing American-owned copper mines, we could do nothing. lndeed, many Americans have come to support actjons like that taken by Chile. For years we have robbed these countries of their resources. They are now only taking what has long been theirs by right. American corporations at last are beginning to learn that they are on their own. American youth will no longer march off to die to protect their profits. Our economy is as dangerous to the environment as it is politically disastrous. We consume the world's resources with a carelessness and arrogance unknown 5 in history. The result, of course, is a polluted environment of which we are increasingly becoming aware. But even in this area we have refusQd to face the hard facts of ecological life. The resources of the world are not infinite. We cannot keep the economy going at the accustomed rate indefinitely. To continue to live at our present affluence means that we will soon exhaust many of the planet's basic resources and make the earth unfit for our children to live. Americans are becoming ecologically conscious. Th_e growing protesl against nuclear power plants reflects this interest. But even if an aroused public forces the electric utilities to conform to stringent safety procedures, the problem of our depleting resources will not be settled. Quite simply, we Will have to cut down on our rate of consumption and learn to lead ecolqgical ly-oriented I ives. Our preoccupation with the GNp has also had a disastrous effect on the quality of our lives. The emphasis on money (which equals status) and material accumulations has caused many Americans to abandon their humanity to the rnarket place. We thrive on overtime, hold down two jobs, and are in tonstant quest of that extra dollar. Making money becomes our primary goal in life. lt is the most patriotic thing we can do. The more we earn, the more we spend, the greater the den';and for goods, the more jobs become available, the more we earn. ln this closed cycle of economic values, the meaning of life is often lost sight of. Th. Organization Man, the symbol of the 1950,s, is still very much in evidence in the large corporations. These people, who personify the economic bind that most working Americans find themselves in, are at the constant beck and call of their corporate employers, who exercise an overwhelming social control of their lives. Alvin Toffler, in Future Shock, calls corporate executives "life-sized chessmen on a continent-sized board." Executives move about the country at the whim of their employers. (lBM is known among its employees as "l've Been Moved"). ln this is reflected the rootlessness that is characteristjcally American. According to Toffler, one out of five Americans has changed address every year since 1 948. The suburbs have been created to serve this highly mobile population. They are known for blandnesi and homogeneity. A suburb on the West Coast is indistinguishable from a suburb in the East, the North, the Mid-West, or the South. Even the natural setting is reduced to a common sameness. When the bulldozers come in to clear land for a suburban development, all the trees, shrubs, and bushes are removed. The land is made completely barren and natural contours are leveled. The suburbs, like our economy, are an efficient and profitable way of settling people on the land. But, again like our economy, they are a social disaster. No wonder the first generation to come out of the suburbs has been a generation of revolutionaries who in many ways reject everything from the past. The consequences of suburban life cannot be measured by statistics. They can, however, be measured by the breakdown of family life and community. The nuclear family, which is as old as the suburbs, is perfect for the consumer life our society has carved out for us. ln olden days, when most people lived in extended families, in big noisy homes full of relatjves and friends, people were able to rely on each other for entertainment. ln the nuclear family, where wife, husband, and kids live isolated from friends, neighbors, b and relations, the family must seek artificial means of spending leisure time. Alone and bored, they are ripe for the message of the advertisers. Consumerism becomes a way of life. There is no other social use for their money but.to spend it on the accumulation of material wealth. This is the way we live, then; our normil situation. Only a plague, a blackout, a disaster like a fire, an earthquake or a flood can blast us out of our separateness and bring us together. We savor those few brief moments when we are together and cherish them forever, but as soon as they pass we go back to our lonely and isolated lives. Out of habit, out of conditioning, because it,s expected.of us, because it's what we've been taught, be- cause that's the way it is, we expect nothing bitter. We guard our lives as we guard our houses, wfrich is to say we do not live in our houses as much as we stand guard within. Our doors are locked; in the larger cities people even place iron bars across their windows and double and triple locks on their doors so that each a apartment resembles a cell. lf we relate to one another, it is as competitors, rarely as friends and neighbors. We are aware of each other's po5sessions, but we dare not inquire into each other's hearts. We are very separate from one another, very lonely, and very much afraid. "All the lonely people, where do they oll come.from, All the lonely people, where do they oll belong?" The feeling of community is alien to contemporary American life. We measure our greatness by our economic and military prowesss, never on the cohesiveness of our community. The striving for community, is a primary motivational force among human beings. But it is a force that has been driven from our lives. People thrilling in community do not need Madison Avenue to tell them what they need for the good life. They,do not need television seti and the thousand and one products that help them pass the time during the hours between the for a closeness with one's neighbors, goods and services that they once thought were necessities. Community makes consumerism obsolete. What is happening among the young and on the communes is beginning to occur in all areas of American life. People are wakening to the fact that their material well-being has not made them any happier for their efforts. The phenomenon of "dropping out" has become commonplace. People are abandoning careers and highpaying jobs to lead more simple lives. The more people who drop out, the more people there are who realize that their old way of living, as serfs to the economic system and consumer fodder for the ever-increasing GNP, has been a costly folly. This discovery is spreading through the country like a shock w.ave. The liberatlon of the consumer spells ultimate disas.ter for the economy. Photo: Diana Davies iob. People are the basic resource in community, and relationship between people is free for the asking. The quality of one's friendships and love of one's neighbors are not statistics that get entered in the ledgers of the GNP. Community is subversive to the American way of life. lt is the only way worthwhile to live' Possibly the most encouraging change in recent years is the awareness of our lack of community and our conscious effort to recreate it in our lives. As this occurs, our dependence on the economy breaks down. The culrent depression can properly be seen as a natural corrective to an over-productive, socially destructive economic system. The depression is a result of an awareness on the part of a growing number of people that our society is sick and that in their role as consumers they contribute to the sickness. Traditionally, the heaviest consumers have been people in their twenties, fresh out of school, in new f obs, recently married, establishlng new households. These are the people who buy new cars, new furnishings, new refrigerators, new television.sets, all of the ltems Americans think they need to get along. This is no longer happening. Young people are no longer the consumers they used to be. Though they continue to spend money on specialized items like phonograph records, stereo sets and cigarette rolling papers, they are learning to live without many other things. Even more important is the return to the con..piot the extended family and a refusal to accept the isolated tenants of the nuclear family on which they were brought up. People are learning that if two can live as cheaply as one, so can four, five, six, ten, and twenty. Cars, food, income, redords all become communal propertY. At one community I am familiar with, 14 people live rather comfortably on a yearly income of about $8,000. Though they grow most of their own food, they are in the process of paying off a heavy mortgage. This kind of economic arrangement is becoming more and more common. The few identifiable communes around the state represent the tip of an iceberg that goes deep into American society. People are learning Io pool their resources, make do with second hand items and recycle their waste products. Living together ttiliiiffi lillEliii$ilffi +:lnirF,,i# tii makes it less necessary for them to rely on expensive entertainments to fill their time. They are able to lead a rich and rewarding life without spending money on 7 What we are moving towards, then, is a No-Growth economy, an economy with a stagnant rate of economic growth and spiraling downward trend in the bloated standard of Iiving. The economic statistics that once defined the nation's health have become irrelevant. The current Depression which describes the faltering economy becomes, in No-Growth terms, a desirablelevelling-off. , So far, the idea of a No-Growth economy has come from the grass-roots, out of a million and more individual,decisions to abandon normal affluence and boycott un_necessary products. This is how it should be, for basic change such as this cannot be imposed by' governmen[ authority. lt must result, instead, from the changing consciousness of people who begin, without co-ercion, to restructure their lives. Certainly, the idea of a No-Growth economy has ramifications ihat touch on every aspect of our lives. Some to these are: * A redefinition of work. With the economy slowed down and'only necessary items being produced, work can become the pursuit of what is useful and enjoyable. People are freed from the dictatorship of the time clock and psychic tyranny of the assembly line. Crafts become important. Working people take pride in what they do and relate to their products on a personal. level. * An end to specialization. Efficiency is no longer the criterion for doing things. Human values become important in how we work. Freed of the necessity of striving for maximum earning power, people can indulge their fantasies. Jacks of all trades replace the narrow interests of the specialists. This trend has already become apparent. Doctors coming out of medical school are abandoning the lucrative rewards of specialized medicine (treating the hypochondria of the rich) to treat the people who really need medical help regardless of their income. Lawyers, too, are moving away from serving the corporate interests for the less financially rewarding work of legal aid, environmental law, and serving the radical political movement. On a more informal level, people are spending less and less on expert and professional help. They are learning to flx their own cars, build their owri houses, and do for themselves whatever they once depended upon experts to do for them. x A lowered standard of living. A stagnant GNP means a deflation of the standard of living because population is growing, so people have to share smaller slices of the pie. This, too, is already happening on communes and in more informally based households. People are learning to live with less, depending on. their own human resources for more. * Rural Reconstruction. For the first time in our modern history, farm population has dropped below ten million. This is due, in part, to agri-business which does not take into consideration the social value of life on the farm. Economic factors have driven small farmers off the land to compete for jobs in the evercrowded cities. A no-Growth economy would reverse this trend. People would begin moving back to the land to develop subsistence-level homesteads in marginal agricultural areas that cannot sustain competitive agriculture on an economically profitable basis. This would revitalize rural areas (the brightest young people would stay on the farm rather than run off to the cities because rural life would become as exciting as the cities used to be) and create a class of small, independent yeoman farmers who would live pretty much independ- a ent of the system. lt would also ease population pressure, as groups of people would be living on farms that once housed just a family or two. Finally, a repopulation of rural America would contribute to a better environment. Fields would get moved, forests would be taken care of, the land would be improved. people would be present to assume responsibility for the care of the land. * Political democracy. lt goes without saying that a No-Growth economy would destroy the hold that the large corporatjons have on society. Many of them would be forced out of business (no one would buy their products), others would be iut back to manageable size. Big money would no longer control our [oli tics. * Peace-oriented politics. ln a NoGrowth economy we would use only our own natural resources or those controlled by other countries on a fair trade basis. Without the need to keep our economy going at a high level, we would no longer have to exploit the economic wealth of the world. This would free us from the burden of being a powerful military nation. Such psychological needs as maintaining our self-image as ,,the most powerful nation on earth" would become unnecessary. We would be too busy tending our own gardens, rebuilding our cities, and creating community in our lives to worry about such absurd things as trying to control the world. The trend towards a No-Growth economy has, as I have said, started on its own momentum. Now it is time to make it into a political issue. (Even radicals refuse to accept that a revolution will mean a cut-back in everybody's level of consumption.) lt is deceptive to talk about a peaceful world or abodt ecology without acknowledging that progress in either requires an end to our worship of the GNP. Unless we reduce our consumption and stabilize the economy, peace and environmental safety are out of our reach. But standard of living is merely a state of mind. Once we learn that life can be better living on less, and that our economic system is socially destructive to our own lives and the lives of others, we can begin looking at a less affluent economic state as something desirable and worth working for actlvely and hopeTully -Marty Jezer l i -l otes on , :,,:i "' '* I iiilrii, out my relationship with myself. Sometimes I sit for a week by myself, thinking, feeling, sometimes writing like this. Some people see this sitting as laziness, but I know that when l'm sitting I can be being lazy or I can be working very hard. lt's hard for other people to see the difference, but to me the feelings are as different as being asleep and being awake, as forest ing ,i, li;r:a:ii' ,[ and desert. lf I sit ind perform the same job twice a minute, 20 times an hour, 5,000 times a week, am I working? I can be almost asleep, repeat myself endlessly, and be paid well. Or perhaps my mind will wander awake, and then it will work while my hands earn money. 'I o I o^"* when l'm working from the feeling I get, the work feeling. A coming alive, involvement, energy flow. Getting in tune with myself, feeling all the different parts of me coming together. Moving ahead together. For a,lawnrnower, the opposite of working is being broken. And for a part of me that's also true. My work isasign of where I am. When l'm broken I don't work. lf I confuse working with making money l'm letting other people decide when l'm working and when l'm not. When other people like my work, they buy it. Their money expresses their sense of me. But my own sense of work has no particular relationship to money or outside approval. Often my best work is with and for'myself. Like working out relationships with other people, or work- Working and growing stand very close together. Perhaps they are completely synonymous. At least I can't think now of how to do one without the other. Learning also is the same. So is change. I have held different jobs for as long as I had the feeling that I was working, and left them when the work feeling was gone and there was only an empty shell. With the work feeling gone I have felt my alive self retreat and shrivel, coming out only "after work." Sometimes I have held on to dead jobs from habit and inertia, but l've always come to where I feel a deathly emptiness coming over me, forcing me to choose between changing and withering away. 'There is a notion called career. lt says that a person should do the same basic thing for a very long time. lt feels very alien to me, not fitting my rhythm of growth and change. I have had several jobs that have been both difficult and involving, but even the most interesting and difficult jobs, like editing my own magazine,lost their sense of real growing work after a while. I once stayed at one job for two and a half 3 years, but that was only because I could change what I was doing as I went along. Sometimes I wonder if l'm just running away, drifting, always staying close to the surface. B"ut I know that as long as I continue to change I will move from job to job in order to stay in tune with my changing sense of work. Work each job to the limit, and when the limit becomes restrictive, move to where there are new limits. Ulitmately there are no limits save those we set for ourselves. My work grows out of my sense of myself, not the other way around. Sometimes I want to sayi,l am a writer" or "l am aleacher," but I feel best when I say "l write" or "l teach." When I look for work I look for a way to express my existence. lf there is no fixed job that lets me do that then I have to create my own. That's how we decided to start our own school. Creating a job is not easy, but I want to be me, not someone else's idea of what I should or might be. How rnany regular jobs are there that let me add to my own energy without stealing it from the people around me? I don't see many. But in the work I create, my energy adds to the energy of others, and theirs energizes me. When I come to the most trying and difficult work, be working with people who add to my enerSy and strength. I feel their support and acceptance, and both help me face the difficulties without being consumed by the fear of failing. it helps me to lf my work atmosphere adds to my fear of failure, I will only attempt safe work. Whatever energy I invest in being afraid of failure is energy diverted from working. I work best when all my energy flows into my work and not into negating side channels. tact with others, then I know that ljudge my work competitively. I ask myself this question: When people around me are le-aping ahead in their work much better than I am, do I feel glad or resentful? lf l'm resentful then I know l'm being competitive. Often I compete not with others, but with some expectation I have of myself. A neutral work ehvironment does nothing to help me overcome this. I am so used to setting myself off against others that I can only cure myself of this disease by careful and ccinscious effort. for Working against my inner habits of competition is, me, very good, strong, rewarding work. When I had been working for the National Student Association for about a year, I began to feel a growing restlessness. I searched for the source in the content of my work, but nothing there matched the intensity of my feelings. Finally I realized that my uneasiness stemmed from the context: an office full of people behind closed doors, in isolated cubicles, working on unrelated programs, not helping or caring about each other, sharing no sense of common purpose or common work. Several other people felt the same way, and we came together around a racism project, trying to mold the beginnings of a cooperative work group. We felt the power of our.new energy, and tried to extend our community of cooperative work, but in the wider staff group nothing changed. Finally we g,ave up and moved to San Francisco. I believe that the structure of the work there at NSA and the prevailing work concepts ruled out any possibility for significanl change. My experience at NSA taught me that there is no easy way to decide to be cooperative. Working togeth- People who see our school often treat us as magical giants, to have been able to do such a thing. They look at themselves as independent, isolated individuals and can't imagine doing what we've done. ln fact, a good deal of strength and courage comes from the sense of community we share. Before we staited the school, we spent five months living together as four people, building a sense of trust and support, growing together into a.real family. Other people may be strengthened by other supportive contexts; this is ours. We tend to think too little about the environment in which we work. We pretend that our energy is unrelhted to the inputs that surround us. When I think of work now, I look at the work environment and context as much as I do at the substance. I measure my work as much by the process as by the result. Competition can be a form of work, brit it doesn't suit the parts of me that I like best. Work that seems cooperative on the surface is often quite competitive underneath. I have felt competitive in my work even when there was no scale of output or system of promotions. When I find myself defensive against the people I work with, creating walls and distances, isolating myself from meaningful work con- 10 Photos: THE FOXFIRE BOOK. See review on p.32. 7- ri ffi I : I I :1 , .i:ilti *x ;f ,"' ,'".o'f I er is so contrary to American culture, so contrary to much of what we have adopted asbur own natures, that we can only slowly and gradually begin to understand what real cooperation means. I see lhat I have begun to overcome my individualistic, competitive, defensive, isolating reflexes. But I also recognize that the reflexes are very deep and that changing them is very difficult. lf I remember this, I won't be disappointed at how slowly I change. Hierarchy says that I should give others the power to judge my work. I see now that giving away this power weakens me, that I feel best when I judge for myself what I do. I am working to take back that judgmental power I have given away and to reject that power over others when they push it at me. At the school there is no sense of one staff person over another, of a person who is in charge. This has not resulted in chaos, but rather in a shared sense of everybody's worth and everybody's help in making difficult decisions. ln my relationship with students this has been harder and slower, but I feel myself moving ahead. I find !. : myself acting less and less as an authority, and the students expect less and less for me to ludge, criticize, validate, and direct them. I see rejecting work hierarchies as just one facet of rejecting all forms of master-slave, top-down, dominantsubmissive relationships. I find this pattern stifling whenever I experience it. ln its place, mutual relationships give me new strength and freedom, and uncover possibilities that I had never even considered before. This goes for employer/employee, teacher/student, male/female, older/younger, parent/ch ild. Developing new work patterns helps me become more aware of the other patterns in my life. lf I don't change them too, I feel myself splitting in half. This is also true when other changing patterns in my life make me aware of contradictions which I resolve by changing my work forms. I have turned almost full circle from the notion that earning money is a sign of doing good work. Now when l'see that someone earns lots of money, I assume that his work can't be worth very much. I do know a few people who are paid well for doing good 11 work, but my over-all experience has been that the better I feel about what l'm doing, the less I get paid for it. lf I have to choose between work and money, I will choose work and learn how not to need so much money. This although l'm married and expect a baby in the next two weeks. I find that the more "family responsibility" I gain, the less I want to sacrifice myself to a need for money. I see that as I have had less and less money I have been happier with my work and with myself. I think of my relationship with my par- l'm not lazy. I like doing good hard work. I\4y most basic instincts lead me to good work. Whatever resistance I feel to these ideas comes fronr having done other people's work for too long. When l'm at school, everthing I do is part of my be whole, not pulled apart by the conflict between work and the rest of my life. But this fusion can also become too strong. When the four of us were Iiving and working together, it felt like the school had taken over our lives altogether. The school is important, but not the only important work I do. When one part takes over the whole, everything falls work. I feel glad to ents and resolve even more strongly to give my kids an open, loving father, even if that should mean fewer clothes and toys. out of balance. Neither I nor Susan believes that it is the man's responsibility to work and earn money. We take equal responsibility for providing for our collective needs. It is possible to see all work as art,and as an expression of who I am. The Balinese have a saying: "We do not have any art; we do everything as well as possible." I like that saying. I am what I do. It's not that I have anything against money. I en- joy discovering what I can do -wiihout, but I don,t enjoy being poor. lt's just that when I think of what would have to give up in order to have more money, I I decide that it's not worth it. At the school, we pay salaries not according to how much each person produces, or how useful others find him, but according to what he needs. Money is a real need, and the staff community resolves to take care of the needs of its members. I express my feelings about other people's work, and they give me their perspective on what I do, but this is not done through the medium of money. Right now, Susan and I together bring in about $29O a month. Recently we have managed to save about $30 a month. We've found that we can get along quite well without a car, and that stroganoff is as good made with hamburger as it is with round steak. It hurts me to hear people say "l work for this company" or "l work for that person." I know that when I'm working best and not just attend ing a job, l'm working only for myself. ln the end, I work for the enjoyment of working. Not that work is happy fun every minute, but when I lose that basic enjoyment of the work l'm doing, l'm best off if I stop and do something else. The best way for me to release work energy is to find my work and begin doing it. This means first not doing other people's work, and so there's a middle period of no work that is very disconcerting. My best tool for surviving this vacuum has been trusting the validity of my existence. Sometimes I find that I begin working for someone else's benefit and neglect my own enjoyment. Then my work moves under the power of some external "should." I feel my resentment growing, but unless I acknowledge my own needs, I can't find the source of the negative energy. My resentment becomes a wall between me and my work. My needs and my work are not in conflict with each other if l'm doing good work. lf I take care of myself I will be able to do my best work. \ Often when my friends or parents aik me what work l've been doing, I become uneasy. I want to answer: "working out some good things with Susan," or "feeling closer to Walt," or "becoming more aware of my sexual feelings." But I still have part of me that says this is not real work. \ The better the sense I have of my own work values, the more completely I can shed the values of others that don't suit me and my life. I I 1 rl lf I have high energy all day, sleep short nights, and wake rested, I know l'm working. lf my energy is low and I sleep long, I know l'm resting. Both work and rest are necessary. I know friends who work without resting, and they seem as unfulfilled as those who rest I i I JT t without working. fl I have more trouble getting myself to rest than I do getting myself to work. America teaches that we are basically lazy, and I still have some parts of that in me. It makes me call rest escape, and keeps me from trusting that when I relax I work best. 6f E :F f A culture that draws a strict dichotomy between work and play will have tedious jobs and trivial, unrewarding leisure. Sometimes when I ask myself what work l've been doing, I find myself looking for products. But work is a process and only the final stage is rewarded with a product. The work I do to overcome my fear of writing, the work of thinking in bed, the work of abortive attempts, all these are as real as the one time when I produce some writing that I like. When l'm concerned with producing l'm trying to prove.to others that I am working. I know that the entire process gives me the feeling of good work, but the product is all I can show someone else. When I go for days teaching at the school ond doing things I enjoy ond getting paid for itond being with people I likeond getting admiration for myself and the school, I know that this is why l've been working so hard to organize my life and my work around my real needs. Then I get a big surge of energy, and strength to begin moving forward again. -David Steinberg IA garage \ ln our travels on the Berkeley Life Alternatives Bus, we have encountered innumerable examples of "alter- \ \ t: E Gt )J = natjve" institutions that are different in style but not in fundamental relationships-free clinics with traditional doctor/patient roles, free schools with traditional teacher/student roles, health and natural food stores with traditjonal buyer/seller roles. There are, of course, rare exceptions which are true alternatives. ln Fayetteville, Arkansas, there are two mechanics, named Mike and Jim, who run the People's Garage. Both are experienced mechanics. Jim has completed a full course of schooling as an auto mechanic. Mike has worked as a mechanic for 12 years-working on various kinds of engines in the Navy, on automobile and diesel engines in various garages, and also as a machinist for five years. Both have been deeply involved in the Movement in Fayetteville, helping with political activities, establishing a local switchboard, an underground newspaper, and a natural foods restaurant' - People's Garage began originally in their home and back yard. When authorities recently kicked them out over zoning hassles, they acquired a barn-like shelter that now serves as a garage. Both work incredibly long hours, more often than not all night in sub-freezing winter weather, keeping themselves going with stimu- lants and occasional nips of Jim Beam. I asked Mike why they work so hard, and he answered by telling me how this car was needed so the owner's wife and child would not have to walk in the cold, how that truck was needed to keep a farm collective going and to transport an old invalid man, and how that VW van must be fixed so a friend could get to Colorado. Their involvement is not with fixing engines; it is with the people. We were not customers; we became friends. ln fact, if someone brings in a car in the impersonal manner characteristic of establishment Sarages, their work will most likely be put off to last. Charges for parts are at wholesale price plus 50lo (to cover thl incredible hassle running to parts stores). Whereas establishment garages charge about $9.50 an hour for labor, their standard rate is only $3.50 an hour. Only rarely do they charge for labor, however. As a friend tells it, "They don't charge for labor if they get to know you; I guess they regard friendship as adequate payment." The preferred form of payment is the tiading of skills. As Mike put it late one night when the cold wind leaked particularly badly into the I N poorly ventilated building, "l sure could dig overhauling an engine for a carpenter right now." Financially, the garage is losing money. Presently, they keep:going bedause their women work in factories, but Mike is optimistic that the Movement will eventually support itself and, in the process, the garage. Traditional mechanic-customer roles are broken down not only by friendship and the sharing of skills, but more importantly by the de-myst.ificatjon of mechanical knowledge itself. People's Garage prefers that people work on their own cars, with their supervision and using their tools if necessary, rather than being dependent on expensive specialists. People are encouraged to work there on an apprentice-type basis. Jim says that their women are becomini quite accom- plished mechanics, and women's classes will soon be initjated. Those of us on the bus gained invaluable learning by rebuilding the carburetor, fixing the fovernor, ietting the valves, and packing the wheel bearings ourselves under watchful supervision. By helping to de-mystify such knowledge, they brought us another step closer to self-sufficiency. Ecologically, the garage also provides a good alternative model. When possible, all parts are saved for later use. lf this is not practical, they are recycled as scrap metal. Utilizing their knowledge of local iunkyards and Mike's experience as a machiniit, they can ieach people how to cheaply convert their vehicles to the use of butane or propane, which combusts with 91% ef frciency as compare d to 27% efficiency for gasoline. They even provided us with literature on how to convert our bus to the use of methane, which can best be produced from chicken and hog dung. lmagine pulling up to a farm and asking to fill up the gas tank with chicken shit! To my mind, People's Garage in Fayetteville is not an example merely of an alternative garage. Other institutions would have other approaches and problems, but the fundamental principles should apply to all alternative institutions. lf our free clinics, free schools, and cooperatives would emphasize friendships over goal-oriented roles like "doctor," or "teacher," if they would learn to trade skills rather than currency, and if they would work to de-mystify their specialized knowledge, then we would all be more competent.as individuils and more self-sufficient as communities' -BillGraY lt pending appeal of his oi two marijuana cigarettes, John is free after almost 29 months of confinement, the last 14 months of which he has spent in isolation. Now he is back among his family, the.Rainbow People's paity. As Chairmin, john is _ anxious to get back to the street and to the-serious work of organizing. The culminating event of the campaign to free John was a Rally held in Ann Arbor and attended by over 15,000 people on December 10. Entertainment was provided by-among others-John Lennon and Yoko Ono, Phil Ochs, Archie Shepp, Allen Ginsberg, Com_ mander Cody and the UP. Speakers included Rennie Davis, Dave Dellinger, Bobby Seale, Jerry Rubin, Father James Groppi. ln addition to john,s mother and wife, Marge Tabankin (president of the National S^,r9:1, Asso_ciation), Sheila Murphy (Labor Defense Loattfion tn uetroit) and .fonnie Lee Tillman (National Welfare Rights Organization) also spo(e. Lasting for more than eight hours, it will be long remembeied as a unique occasion in the history of Michigan. ' Perhaps the song which John Lennon a-nd yoko wrote.and sang f-or John at the Rally captures the spir_ it of those who fought so long and hard for his freedom. John is out of prison. ^ .Itoinally, 10 year'sentence for 9% possession It ain't fair /ohn Sincloir ln the stir for breothing air ll/on't you core for /ohn Sincloir? ln the stir for breothing oir Let him be, set him free Let him be like you and me. (Chorus) gotta gotto gottq gotta gotto gotta gottq gotto gotto set him free! lf he'd been o soldier mon in Vietnam lf he was the C.l.A. Selling dope and making hoy l7e'd be free, they'd let him be Breathing olr like you and me. (repeat Chorus) Was he joiled for what he does? Or representing everyone ? Free /ohn NOW! lf we cqn From the clutches of the mon Let him free, lift the lid, Bring him to his wife ond kids. (Chorus) They gove him ten for two! ond they got PUN PLAMONDON too! gotto gotto gotto gotto gotto gotto gotto gotto gotto gotto gotto gotto gottq set him freel F. R. E. E. Freeeeeeeeeeee ! ! ! We 11 ffi !fft tr{ -t! {& 'rE ,v They gove him ten for twol llhot else con /udge Colombo do? We gotta gotto gottct gotta Shooting gooks / 2. ''1 On New Year's eve, I interviewed John (and his wife Leni and daughter Sunny) at the headquarters of the Rainbow People's Party in Ann Arbor. Mostly, the discussion is John's personal rap about where he's been, where he hopes to go and what it means. JE: How does it feel to be out of prison? jOHN: Well, it feels wonderful. lt's such a shock though, that it's gonna take me a few weeks even to get used to it, right? fE: Leni, how does it feel to have John out? LENI: lt's a whole different world for us. Before he got out-for two and a half years-all the people who live here at the Rainbow People's Party house spent most of their time on the campaign to free John, and it's taken a lot of orlanizing over a long tirne to bring this about. And so having John back is, like the possibilities of what we can do are just so much greater and it is just so much fun trying to work things out together, instead of having to wait for an answer for two weeks with no guarantee that the letter will ever get there. You know, whenever an idea just pops into our heads we can just talk to John about it. And it's just beautiful. jE: Has it helped to bring the people in the Party together, to be part of this campaign? LENI: That's part of it, yes. There's a lot of people who live in this house who had never met John before, and they got as involved in the campaign as the people who have known him, as.l, for seven years. And now people know who he is. LENI to SUNNY (their four year old daughter): What is it like for you to have fohn out? SUNNY: Good. LENI: the people are carrying on ln other states and just in general the way that the marijuana laws have become an issue, .iust because there are so many people who smoke weed and who are being victimized by this stuff. What is it, Leni, twenty-nine or thirty states that are changing the laws? LENI: There are twenty-nine now. jOHN: The Federal Government is trying to make it a misdemeanor. There will still be a push on for legalization, both on a national and local level. So they'll get this as a culmination of one stage of that, you know, and a thrust into the next stage which would involve legalization of marijuana for everybody. JE: Do you think that some of the people that have been involved in the campaign for legalization of marijuana are going to be involved in other political activity as a result of their experience? JOHN: Oh, definitely! I think for one thing that the whole marijuana issue has brought a lot of people into a consciousness of the character of our culture and the character of the things we do that threaten Capitalist civilizatjon. ln other words, this has made them see that people being arrested and imprisoned and hasseled all the time for smoking weed are being attacked as cultural criminals. lt's a political thing rather than anything having to do with crime. And people really, I think, really dig that-are really hip to it. lt makes them more aware of other aspects of government. You see, it leads into.the vote, for example. When you say to people, "Well the way they get these laws, the way they lock us up, is that they make these laws as they send these people to Lansing (the State Why? SUNNY: Because I missed him for a long time. ,l E: What have you been doing with him? SUNNY: Nothing. Just messing around and playing. JE: Would you like to say anything about the gigantic freedom rally held in the (University of Michigan's) Chrysler Arena just before you were released? JOHN: Well, yes I would. I just feel'that the Rally was like the decisive thing that brought about the release. It was a culmination of the campaign that had gone on for two and a half years, overall actually five years. lt goes back five years when this originally came down. You know, we've been fighting it ever since then. And the Rally and the thing that happened the day before, which was the change in the Michigan mariiuana statutes, we feel that the change in the laws was brought about by the struggle of people around the issue-especially this case. You know, like this case is a fulcrum that we feel helped change the laws and the Rally was the thing that on top of that just moved the Michigan Supreme Court and the polit.ical structure in the State of Michigan. They could see that there was this much mass support for the issue, you know, and for me personally as an embodiment of the issue. ln other words the whole Free John campaign was never like, couched in terms of just a personal thing, that we have to get this person out, but rather we structured the whole thing in terms of dealing with the marijuana laws and the oppressive ways in which these laws are used to single out people. And we characterized the whole thing as what it was; in fact, an attack on a whole way of life and the whole way a people live and get high and shit like that. JE: Do you think this will bring about a change in the laws in a number of other states? John Sinclair and Dr. John JOHN: Well not this particular thing, but the struggle backstage at Cobo Hall Photo: David Fenton capitol), and so these people in Lansing have to do as we say." Look what we did when we all went out to Chrysler Arena and did this thing. See, they had to respond to that. We made them respond. We made them change the laws. Now if we keep putt.ing pressure on them; the more pressure, you see, we can bring about more change. lE: Are you going to be doing political work in that direction over the next few months? JOHN: Hopefully, yes. Hopefully we'll be involved in the community here. This is our main focus of attention, organizing a Rainbow Community in Ann Arbor and organizing in the Detroit area and throughout the state by the end of the year. Hopefully by summer we'll be able to start moving into some of those areas. So the main focus of our work is to organize people along the lines of the Tribal Council and The People,s Service Organ izatio n, creati n g al ternatj ve i n sti tu tions : the Food Co-op, the People's Ballroom. JE: Can you say a little bit more about how the Food Co-op works, the kinds of things that are going on there the social order along with it. There is a mass movement of people that don't have any direction, and if there !s a so-called Radical Movement, it doesn,t seem to have many ties with the people. You know, they seem to be caught in their own thing pretty much. JE: A lot of young people that we talk to who are really into Rock, when you ask them about politics they just turn off. ? LENII The way the Food Co-op works is relatively simple. lt's in the beginning stages right now. lt started just about a year ago in January, 1970. There were seven different communes and all of our friends around town, they got together and put four dollars each together and took a van and went to the Eastern Market in Detroit and bought food and vegetables in q.uantity. And just by word of mouth the riext week, the next Saturday, there were about twenty familiei or tribes or communes. The week after that is was almost doubled. lt just grew organically. And then after a while we thought of systematizing, we thought of having meetjngs every week to involve more people of the community in the work, actually going down there t9 get the food and distribute it. Later it got so big we had to rent a van, big huge trucks to go down there. lnstead of one, there are two locations where the food gets separated and bagged and picked up. And the people always came over to the Rainbow People's Party House every week to pay their money, to pay their four dollars in advance. All kinds of people, not just freaks, you know, straight- families, students, and even the Mayor of Ann Arbor came and got his food from the Food Co-op. For that much money, four dollars, you get two bags of stuff, and the equivalent at the A&P is about fourteen dollars, and it would be as good ! So now, it's up to about four hundred orders each week and the Food Co-op is really ready to expand as soon as we get the money and some resgurces accumulated so we can open up a Erocery store. ln fact, the students at the University, the Student Government Council is now talking about setting ui their own grocery store because the prices in Ann Arbor are just so ridiculous. And it wouldn't be just open to the students, you know, it would be open to the whole community. Yes, there will be a big celebration on the 19th of )anuary to celebrate the first anniversary of the Food Co-op. JE: There's been a lot written about the Rock Culture and about the broad movement to transform this country. Do you think there's a chance they can be brought together? JOHN: Well, I think definitely that is whar the Rock and Roll Culture is about, transforming this country. I think that what we have is a mass movement of people who are seeking to and who are actually transforming themselves and transforming the nature of 15 I John Sinclair registering to vote at the Union Ballroom Registration Boogie -photo: David Fenton fOHN: Rightl Rightl lt isn't that they don't want things to change. lt isn't that they aren't prepared to do things to change the situation, but it's a matter of the way they've been approached by so-called political people or by radicals. lt has been done from a standpoint where the radicals don't know where the people are at and so they approach them in such a way as to piss them off, and make them very, very leery of having anything to do with that kind of stuff. But that doesn't mean that. . . I mean that the Movement interprets this to say, well, the Movement is dead and the People are apathetic and don't want to do anything. Well, I think what we were saying is that there is just a mass movement of people, that there is more and more what we call Rainbow People. . . J E: Do they see themselves as Rainbow People? lsn't that maybe, part of what you're trying to do, to help them see themselves thal way? JOHN: We're trying to give them a consciousness of what they actually are. ln,other words, our thing for a number of years, you know, that we've been doing has been to try to clarify for people what they, in fact, are. To educate the people to their possibilities in terms of what they are, not in terms of transforming them into something different, just consciously being what they are. So in other words, our thing has been all along that there is a mass movement of people that getting bigger and bigger all the time who are a revolutionary force, whether they see themselves as this or not. jE: Can they transform themselves? JOHN: They are in the process of transforming themselves and they're transforming themselves not only individually, but also collectively. And in the process of that, they're having a transformation effect on the whole social order, which is bringing more and more people; like straight people are getting farther out all the time. You see this doesn't mean that the revolution is accomplished or that this is the revolution, or anything like that What it means is that this is a potential revolutionary force. This is a force of people who want want change, who want thlngs to be different, and who who want a revolutionary movement which is vital and and which is supported by the people, and which has won the support of the people. When such a phenomenon occurs we believe that the people will support it en mass and the people will create a revolutionary situ- of consciousness, the same kind of openness and love for each other. People on the street who are not involved in communes, who are just people on the street, who are going to thrust out all this weirdness, have a high level of communal consciousness. lt's a whole new way of looking at the world and relating to things. lt's a communalist way of relating to things. lt's unconscious and a lot of people are not able to practice it, you know, like people rip off other people for stuff. That's is antjthetical you would think. But that's a condition of their oppression. What they would like to be is in love. That's what we'd all like to be. JE: So you are talking more about the way people are trying to relate to each other than what kind of labels they give to the movements that they are a part of. Would you say that the kind of movements that I mentioned before and that you were talking about, many of them are really pointing in the same direction? Many of them are working for the same kind of love? jOHN: Rightl Right! Certainly! They're going through a lot of weird changes, you know, to get there. That's where radicals start, with that thing of loving people and iust wanting things to be different. But they get caught up in their thing and get to a point where they aren't talking the same language as the people on the street. So the people on the street don't recognize that they're part of the same thing. That's what our work has been about for the last three or four years. We've been trying to get people on the street to relate to the fact that the revolutionary movement for change, Black Liberatjon struggle, the Chicano struggle, and all the other struggles, are all apart of the same thing. There isn't any contradict.ion between our culture and. the political struggle. ln fact, if we want to survive as a people, then we're going to have.to relate to struggle. Because our culture is antithetical to the lmperialist Culture, or what we call the Death Culture, and is an absolute threat to it, they aren't going to let us survive in any kind of form in which we need to ation. see the Rainbow movement with the Black movement, the Chicano movement, the movement of the Native Americans, for example? JOHN: Well that's a part of it. There are two ways to corlsider the term, Rainbow People. Right now it is freaks that are Rainbow People. As the develppment of humanity progresses and it is progressing very rapid: ly now, more and more people are becoming Rainbow People. We think in the end that all people will be Rainbow People. All people will have the same kind JE: How do you survive. So we're going to have to resist. E: So you're expecting more repression than we've seen before, and certainly we've seen a good deal in the recent past. Do you expect to see more people like yourself thrown in jail on whatever kind of charges can be trumped up? JOHN: You're going to see attempts to do that on the one hand, and you're going to see, as the level of the people's consciousness raises and as everyone who is involved with this begins to see that we're all apart of the same thing and when they snatch people off and throw them in the penitentiary, more people realize it could just as well be them. This was our whole point throughout the campaign. lf they could take me and charge me with possession two joints and give me nineand-a-half to ten, they could do it to anybody. That was the point behind that-for people to understand that it isn't about individualism, it isn't about doing your own thing. You can't do your own thing because the police will come and knock your door down and drag you out of there. We were only doing our own thing five years ago. We didn't want to bother anybody. We were completely dropped out. We were trying to build an alternative scene, but we certainly didn't want to bother anybody. And the police came down and sent agents in and came to communal dinners, came to help produce pamphlets, call for the legalizatlon of marijuana, you dig? And produce books of poetry, and just play on J LNS 17 the openness and the most human qualities of people really trying to develop their humanity. And these snakes came in there-and that's where we get our political education. Our politics came from working with Rock and Roll bands and going around getting beat up by police. Every time we were going to play, the police would cause sorne kind of scene to try to keep it from going on because they didn't want people having a good time like that. And that's where our politics came from. JE: Does that suggest that some of the work is going to have to be done by cadres as well as some of it being done out in the open with as many people aspossible a part of it? jOHN: Yeah. You have to develop cadres that are skilled and can deal with these things. We developed a cadre during the time that I was locked up. They were forced to develop, to deal with these things. We stjll have three brothers in the penitentiary. And this is just a small organization. protection against infiltratjon f E: lt sounds like for you almost have to have a cadre set-up. JOHN: Oh, certainly. I mean we live this way anyway, you see. That's the thing about a communal organizational unit, you know, we live together. Leni and I have lived together for seven years. Grimshaw has been with us for five years. Frank Bach has been around since '66, you know. My brothers, people like Fenton, who were the latest to .ioin us, have been here a year already. You see, so there's that kind of thing. To start with we're just freaks. We're freaks, but we're conscious. That's the only difference that we feel-the only difference between us and the people on the street who are freaks, is that we're conscious of what we're doing. And that they aren't yet conscious. But we aren't weird in terms of what people are on the street. We aren't different or we're not radicals, or strange, we're just freaks, you know. JE: Maybe we can talk about the consciousness in the context of a local situation. Now a new third party, the Human Rights Party, has been set up in the State is a Radical lndependent Party here in Ann Arbor which has coalesced with the Human Rights Party, and I .iust wondered how you saw the Rainbow effort fitting together with an actjve third of Michigan. There party movement here locally? JOHN: (Zoltan Ferenczy, incidently, was on the committee to free John Sinclair. He organized the Human Rights Party.) Well, we don't have a position. We're still trying to work out our posit.ion on it. We will definitely be involved in registering voters and we'll definitely be participating in elections, as we have in the past. See, last spring when the Radical lndependent Party made its first effort, they weren't organized rvell enough to get themselves on the ballot. They had just organized themselves. The elections were in April and they organized themselves in January. So we worked with them, but when it came down to the election, they ran write-in candidates. But we had a very serious Mayoral election here, as you know and there was a dinosaur running against a liberal Democrat. The dinosaur would, if he had been elected, with one swat of his tail, have run us out of town. And again, this was a time when I was at the penitentiary and we had three other people in the penitentiary and they're scuffling out here trying to pay the rent, and like that. So this was a very serious issue to us and the Radical lndependent Party said, "Well, let's run a write-in candid,rte." They ran a typical radical l8 line. There was no difference between the candidates. They all stand for big business and property and this and that. And we said that you could look at it in the abstract like that, both the Republicans and the Democrats are part of one party called the Property Party. And we don't propose to say that by supporting a Democratic candidate, we're going to get everything that we want and that everything is going to be hunky dory, and the war is going to end and everything else. But that we live here and we try to organize in this community and our people are here and we're struggling. We need room to breathe. The Democrats have been responsive to pressure we've brought to bear on them and we organized elements of our community, the Rainbow Community. We went to the City Council and asked for free concerts in the parks, asked them to iighten up on people smoking weed and to stop busting doors down. They responded to that and in the light of all that, we supported Robert Harris for Mayor. We issued a statement through the Tribal Council that we supported the Mayor. The Radical lndependent Party was mad about this. But the Mayor and the Democratic Party feel that this was a decisive factor in their victory. They let us have free concerts and responded by lowering the penalty for marijuana possession to ninety days in Ann Arbor. Now we're going to force them to enforce the local law. Also, Mayor Harris sent an incredible statement of support to the Rally. They have done stuff like that, so there are things you can do. That's why we don't know about the Human Rights Party. lt depends on their strength, JE: You wanted to say a bit more about the Rally? JOHN: Talking about the Rilly, in one sense, it was a demonstration. I think it was also really a breakthrough in terms of some of the things we've been talking about: the essential unity of culture and politics, particularly music and politics. Here you had a situation where two of the prominent Rock and Roll persons, John and Yoko, came out here. lt was their first appearance in a long time. lt was their fir'st appearance in America where they performed at a rally for a political prisoner. They took a stand on this and they made it clear that,they were going to take their economic power and put it in the service of the People's cause. This is a tremendous breakthrough. We've always had that scene around here, Ann Ar- bor, Detroit and in Michigan. This is something the people outside of here don't understand. The bands have always been completely integrated into the community. The bands have played benefits and free concerts. There's a close knit community here anyway. Musicians all know each other and have all come up through the same scenes with them. We were into music for two solid years before I got locked up. We were in the music business with the MC5, we were playing jobs just like other bands. So there's always been a real strong thing and that's why throughout the two and a half years that I was locked up, every time we had benefits or any kind of drives to raise money for a righteous cauib, the bands from this area have consistently participated in all this stuff. There's a real unity between music and politics. You could take the Commander, which people could say is a nonpolitical band, but the Commander always plays benefits and free concerts. The people in his band go back to the beginning of that unity in 1967. Billy C had a band called Billy C and the Sunshine, and Billy Kerchan was in a band called the Seventh Seal, and those two bands and the MC5 were the I .I three Trans-Love bands when we originally started. Those two brothers are now in the Commander,s band. The John and Yoko Rally was a culmination of about I \ I I six months involving all the bands from this area. We that expanding, but we see it on a national leyel and on a big money level. This was a tremendous breakthrough, and a lot of other bands are going to be participating in this when they can deal with people who know what they're doing in terms of producing music. We can produce concerts and we can produce benefits. We know how to do it because that's our productive work. That is how we support ourselves. We aren't supported by Liberals. We're supported by our economic work in the Rock and Roll business. We have a band now, The Up, and they work just like other bands. lt isn't a weird collectjon of politicos who happen to play guitars, but this is a Rock and Roll band. These are krds who grew up and who are now members of our party, who are politically conscious Rock and Roll musicians. They're into that and are really aware of what they are doing. We see the John and Yoko concert fitting into that context and being a fulcrum to move from one stage to the next. JE: Let me ask a question about those stages. ls it possible that one of them may focus on getting Nixon out of the White House? Do you see a specific campaign with music being part of the fund raising effort? see JOHN: This is another th.ing that we really can'r say anything about because our position isn't clear yet. We haven't had a chance to talk before. We've been meeting all week. Before I went in it was just an idea. The party didn't have any organization at all. And now through this two and a half years of struggle to get me out, an organizatjon has formed by people working around those specific issues. They had to organize themselves in order to survive. And now we have a political organization with a political consciousness. JE: Well, maybe you could say how you personally feel about the campaign as it stands now and the call that's going out to young people all over the country to make the scene in San Diego? IOHN: Well, l'm still making an investigation on that. l'm not excited about it. That's as much as I can say. JE: Are there any other kinds of current political questions, for example, the renewed bombing of North Vietnam, that you'd like to relate to? JOHN: l'm more interested right now in the wider scope, in the way things are going to develop in this next period. I think we've reached a turning point as people. I think that 1912 is going to start a new stage in our development. To me, 1972 relates back not to 1 968, but back to 1 965 and 1 966 when that huge cataclysmic change occurred. I think we're Soing to 8o through another one of those and this will thrust us farther forward. Things will get a lot farther out next year. I think you'll see that congregating or manifesting itself around the big Nixon issue. I think you'll see a lot of strange mass movements start to develop that are really conscious and have a direction. E: Are there any other particular areas in which you expect some mass movement activity where we haven't J seen it before? JOHN: We're certainly going to be trying to get people involved in the prison situation. Like our people, the freaks. JE: What kind of issues related to prisons? JOHN: Again, we haven't firmed our position on this. Just under the general slogan of "Open Up The Prisons." Let people see what's going on. ln Michigan par- ticularly, that would be a slogan because the people who run the penitentiaries refuse to let anybody from 19 the outside in to see what it's about. They are just vile. There are a lot of prisoners who have a lot to say and they aren't going to let them say anything. The mail is photocopied. lt's a real creepo scene. A Czarist-Russia scene. lt's disgraceful, dehumanizing, degrading, and we don't like it. We don't feel that people on the , streets, any of whom may be going to the penitentiary at any given moment because they are all outlaws and criminals, are going to like it when they start hearing about the penitentiary and seeing what it's all about and witnessing the attitudes of these people. JE: Along with the activity going on outside to deal with prisons, do you expect more organizing to be going on with the prisons? JOHN: ln the State of Michigan, at least, the amount of organizing that goes on inside of prisons will be di- rectly proportionate to the amount of support that they get from people on the street. lf they have no support, it is impossible to organize because they just get locked up and get sent to Marquette and thrown in the dungeon. You don't hear from them again. Or shot, as George Jackson was shot. You can't organize in prison unless you've got some support from the people on the outside. I mean, organized support with a financial base, with lawyers who can come to the assistance of those who are moved against for doing any kind of educatjonal work inside the penitentiary. By doing this a lot of publicity will bring attention to the situation. And this will give a lot of prisoners the inspiration they need, the support they need, and the security they need to organize themselves pol itical ly. It's almost impossible to educate yourself politically in the penitentiary because they ban books and they take them away from you. They declare them contraband. The Red Book is contraband. I mean, you just don't have them. People were smuggling them in, at one time, through guards. So there is all that interest, but the penitentiary is so tight that they don't let the prisoners get what they need. And that can only come through the support from the outside. We have a lot of plans but that is something else, the specifics of which won't be released until we get it all worked out. I E: Are you optimistic about the future? JOHN: ln terms of saying something to the people, the people l've been talking to when I see them on the streets, or in Rock and Roll ioints that we've been going to, is that we all have to realize that the outlook is bright. There's reason to be optimistic, to be excited about our possibilities. The outlook isn't dark. lt's dark when you look at it from an idealistic position. But if you look at it in terms of where we've come from in the last five years, the outlook is incredibly bright. And I'm just killer optimistic. l'm iust as excited as could be. -John Erlich LNS The men who fought in world war two were assured of the nation's gratitude, and they were rewarded for their service. Veterans of Vietnam have received no such appreciation, as they re-entered a society still debating the value of their sacrifice. They discovered that their existence was an embarrassment, even to the war's proponents. At a time when their friends were still dying, they were expected to forget their combat nightmares and resume their lives as if nothing had happened. Many of these veterans have realized their common consciousness as participants in an unpopular war. They have found the established veterans' organiza- tions unresponsive to their needs. Thus the Vietnam Veterans Against the War, which includes an active drug treatment program for returning veterans. Unlike the members of the Legion and the VFW, they do not cherish their wartime experiences. lnstead, they have expressed their anguish over what they have seen and done, at numerous Mnter Soldier lnvestigations. Conflict was inevitable, and it finally surfaced, with particular irony, in an issue as characteristic as any: amnesty. To protest hearings being conducted by Senator Kennedy, the Massachusetts VFW called a "wide open" press conference for the first of March in Fitchburg. lt invited all of the Presidential candidates and members of other veterans' groups-including the VVAW. Participants began to arrive at the Cleghorn American Legion Post early Wednesday afternoon. There were intermittent rumors that Sam Yorty and Henry Jackson would appear. Older veterans were noticeably apprehensive about the surprising turnout of Vietnam veterans, many of them dressed in faded combat fatigues. A sign by the door read: "Anyone wearing dungarees will be asked to leave the hall." lt was not enforced. By the time the press conference began, there were fifty VVAW members and supporters, a third of the audience. Homer Ford, the moderator and a VFW of-ficial, delivered a fiery welcoming address. The iciea of amnesty was "an affront to all self-respdcting Americans," and the estimated 75,000 exiles were lumped together with Benedict Arnold, Alger Hiss, and the Rosenbergs. Letting them return would be "a stab in the back" to the men who had fought in Vietnam. He castigated the supporters of amnesty as "bleeding hearts" and condemned their influence upon the impressionable young. And so on. Representatives of other veterans' organizations echoed the same themes with monotonous regularity. At last Ford introduced Dennis Randall of the VVAW, who received a standing ovation from his contingent. The moderator gingerly lauded the unity of purpose of the "allied veterans' organizations," but added that he recognized dissent as "part of the democratic process." challenged the glorification of those who . Randall had given their lives in battle, evoking the agony which the veterans had inflicted and suffered: "You speak -Ihere is ni.i h,:;rc; .: of honor and patriotism. , . . gunning down women and children, and there is no patriotism in bombing defenseless villages from supersonic aircraft. As for the dead? They were our brothers and comrades. We would rather have them alive in in Canada than buried in Arlington." At this point there was long and heavy applause. He continued: "We are veterans of Vietnam! We do not oppose amnesty for our brothers in exile. We only wish that some power could grant us amnesty for what we have seen and done half a world away. The memory of Vietnam will haunt us for the rest of our I ives. " Randall completed his statement and urged the cooperation of the other organizations in programs relevant to returning veterans. Rehabilitation of the soldiers who had become addicted in lndochina was more important than debating amnesty. The older veterans did not appear sympathetic. By now moderator Ford was clearly unhappy. Abruptly, he announced that 5,000 more American troops were being withdrawn from Vietnam, leaving American strength at less than 130,000 men. "How many B-52's were pulled out?" someone shot back. Ford angrily called for order. A little later when the television crews began packin!, he interjected that there would be a "dramatic announcement" at the end of the press conference. The crews continued pack ing. Ford then introduced Billy .f oe Clegg, an independent candidate for the Presidency-who claimed that the Lord was his campaign manager. He started by singing "God Bless America," and the VVAW joined in, immediately. After a startled pause, the older veterans began to sing, too. The affair had become a circus. Clegg launched into a ten minute harangue, ac- cusing the VVAW of being brainwashed by the Communists. He seemed to be enjoying himself. Even the officers at the podium were smiling with embarrassment. Following Clegg's performance, Ford called for unanimous support of the conference's stand against amnesty. The older veterans voted predictably; Randall dissented for the VVAW. James Owens, a retired Navy veteran, was recognized from the floor as a member of the Veterans for Freedom from Future Wars. He, too, voted against "unanimous support." Pvt. Richard Rowe, an active-duty Gl, identified himself as a member of the Fort Devens United Front and demanded a vote. After a brief argument this was denied, and a VFW commander shouted that he would would not impugn the dignity of his organization by continuing the meeting. The event was a disaster for the VFW and its allies, and neighboring newspapers gave the Vietnam veterans sympathetic coverage. These established organizations have traditionally claimed to represent the interests of all veterans. Now it was evident that they had lost their most vital constituency to a bunch of upstarts who had gleefully taken advantage of an unexpected invitation to rnak e l'hcqi ? nntar rid iculous and :i:,,,. , l :,;nans "l r 'i, ir, ,f,. old wisdom suggests, on the playing fields of America where young boys are made into men. lt never happens that way, of course, but it is supposed to. But sinqe athletic competition serves as a masculinity rite, it is not surprising that women who partici- pate in competitive sports are faced with a degree of discrimination and oppression that probably surpasses that which women encounter in any other area of American society. The woman athlete, no matter how high her level of athletic skill may be, is never fully accepted in this milieu with all its male mythology. Nothing could be more devastating for a male athlete than to be defeated by a woman; and at the same time, the qualities of aggressivity and muscularity required for athletic success result in women athletes often being ostracized by other women. Because she is perceived as a threat by both men and women, the woman athlete is often a lonely, marginal person, never fully accepted by either group. Marie Hart, a prominent woman physical educator, succinctly describes tliis dilemma: "American society cuts the penis off the male who enters dance and places it on the woman who participates in competitive athletics." Mildred "Babe" Didrikson Zaharias, de' scribed by Paul Gallico, one of America's most distinguished sports writers, as "probably the most talented athlete, male or female, ever developed in our country" encountered the difficulties suggested by Dr. Hart on an almost daily basis throughout her athletic career that lasted from the early 1930s to shortly before her death from cancer in 1955. Mrs. Zaharias won national and international titles in nearly gvery sport open to women during her 25-year career as a competitive athlete. Before turning to golf during the later years of her career where she v/on every amateur and profes' sional title available to a woman, she was a star in track and field at the 1932 Olympic Games and was a perennial All-American in basketball. Though she stood onIy 5 feet, 6% inches and weighed no more than 125 pounds, she was constantly portrayed by the male sportswriters of the time as having a boyish appearance. She wore her hair short for convenience, but she was an extremely attractive woman. Despite this, she was always referred to as a tomboy, and according to Gallico, one of the favorite iokes of the male sportswriters was that athletic promoters never knew whether to assign her to the men's or women's locker room when she showed up for a competition. It is of course true that there are some women athletes whose size and appearance qualify them as being "unfeminine" according to traditional Western standards, but, as was the case with Mrs. Zaharias, most athletes are treated the same regardless of their actual physical appearance or behavior. (The exceptions to this occur in sports that are characterized by graceful movements and little physical exertion, such as ice skating, diving, gymnastics, skiing and similar activities, where a woman can part.icipate without being typed "masculine.") Not surprisingly, most women who participate in competitive athletics are extremely conscious about looking "feminine." Vicki Foltz, a27-year-old married woman who is probably America's finest woman long distance runner, was asked in a recent interview whether she had any "feminine hang-ups about running." She responded, "Yes, I have lots of hiong-ups. You wouldn't believe it. I olwoys worry obout looking nice as 22 e S \---- IIJ IrntI lI spInril in o roce. I worry about my colf muscles getting big. But mostly I worry qbout my hoir. The morning before my lost big roce it wos hoiling ond blowing, but there I was in the hotel with rollers in my hoir. I knew the roin would ruin my hairdo, but I fixed it onyway. I suppose it's becquse so mony people hove soid women athletes look mosculine. So o lot of us try, subconsciously moybe, to look os feminine os possible in o roce. There's olwoys lots of hoir ribbons in the roces!" lf an attractive, mature married woman with children like Vicki Foltz feels this pressure, one can only imagine what it must be like for younger women athletes such as the female swimmers who often participate in the Olympics while still in their early teens. Marion Lay, for instance, participated in the Tokyo Olympic Games when she was only 14 years old. By 1967 she had developed into one of the finest female swimmers in the world, and she won four silver medals at the Pan American Games that year. She won a medal at the 1968 Olympic Games and also served as captain of the Canadian Olympic women's swimming team despite being only 18. But in many ways her career was frustrated. The only coaches available to her were men, since in swimming, as in nearly all other sports, it is next to impossible for a woman to advance in the coaching profession. Marion found that nearly all the male coaches and officials she met refused to the men in America. What she obviously does do dive correctly. is Another myth that the male-dominated athletic world works to perpetuate about women, especially the.female teenage swimming sensations who began their careers at the age of 12 or so, is that they i"nvari_ ably retire when they get to be about l7 because they Decome tnterested in boys and no longer have tjme for competitjve athletics. Conveniently igriored is the fact that most male athletes are not knorin for their sex_ ual abstinence. lf male athletes have time for girl friends, there is obviously no reason why femile ath- letes could not also continue to participate in sports while dating, The shortness of their ."ir..rs is due to other circumstances: the tremendous social pressures l've mentioned, and also the fact that only a handful of colleges in the entire United States givei even partial athletic sc.holarships to women. CompiieJ io-men, the oportunities for women to be supported while competing in athletics after high school are almost non_ex_ istant. Additionally, most women college physical ed_ ucators attempt to steer women students awav from ly competitive ath letics lf a woman does survive all this, h igh she faces a double standard even after achieving a sufficient skill level to participate in national or international level competi_ tion. This past track season the AAU barred one of our most prominent female track stars from international competition because of ,,unladylike,, behavior gl q.f.orgigl rour the previous summer. Her ,,unladylike" behavior involved a member of the U.S. men,s international team that was touring atong wiih ti,e women's team, but this individual was not even repri- manded. accept the fact that she was as dedicated to swimming of the male athletes. The attitude of male coaclhes and officials seems to be that worflen are somehow incapable of being as dedicated to sports as men, whereas.in reality the opposite is oiten true. Being a marginal person, as I pointed out earlier, the female - athlete often dedicates herself to sport with a fervor unmatched by male athletes since athletic success is one of the few satisfactions available to her. Unlike the case for male athletes, athletic prowess does not assure a woman of social status. The final step in the Catch 22 of women's sports is that those women athletes who do totally dedicate themselves to sport are invariably labeled as being rhasculine by the male-control led sports establ ish ment. . !ince sport functions as a masculinity rite, all the desirable qualities athletes rnust possess if they want to achieve a high level of success have been made synonymous with our cardboard concept of masculinity. This point was brought home to me when in a recent Sports lllustroted article, the male diving coach of Micki King, America's and perhaps the world,s finest woman diver, attempted to compliment Miss King by saying he knew early in her career that she was go-ing to b.e great because, "She dives like a man.,, Vty im-" mediate reaction on reading that statement was that as any she sure as hell doesn'tdive like me or any other man I ever met. ln fact, she doesn't dive like 99 percent of Because of the limited opportunity women have to participate in sport at all levels, a New york State court recently ruled that girls can participate against boys on the high school level in non-contact sporis. Some women and many men hailed this ruling as a major breakthrough in the attempt to end the discrimination women encounter in sport. However, since there will only be a very fewgirls who will be able to make the,,boys, team," this ruling could exacerbate rather than attenuate the discrimination against women if people see this as the end of the struggle. Women are not so desirous of competing against men-although there is of course no reason they should not have that opportunity if they want it-as they are in having the same opportunity to participate in sports that men have. This means providing women with the same facilities and coaching skills men have. The frustration of the woman athlete is further compounded by her inability, because of basic differences in speed and strength, to ever achieve success according to male standards. Hopefully, our society will come to the point where women will not only be given equal opportunity to partlcipate in sport, butwill not be made to feel that they are somehow inferior athletes because they run 1 00 yards in I 0.5 rather than 9.5. Simone de Beauvior best sums it up in The Second -Sex where she writes, ", . ,ln sports the end in view is not success independent of physicol equipment; it is rather the ottzinment of perfection within the limitotions of eoch physicol type: the feotherweight boxing champion is os much of o chompion as is the heavyweight; the womon skiing chompion is not the inferior of the faster mole champion; they belong to two different closses. jack Scott 23 u't ,? < l{, Norman, Oklahoma 73069 TEXAS Austin WRLlDirect Action, P.O. Box 7i 61, University Station, Austin, fexas I 81 12 Ft. Worth WRL,1322 Hemphill, Ft. Worth, fx.76104 ND PIN black enamel on steel. $1 VIRGINIA Edinburg Virginia WRL, Rt.3, Edinburg, Ya.22824 WEST VIRGINIA Morgontown WlN, 420 Stewart St., MorgTntown, W. Va. 26545 ln addition to the above groups, there are about ro: WAR RESISTERS TEAGUE 339 leleyette Slrccl, New Yort, N.Y. ll[12 membership we will list them as local WRL's. lf you would like to begin organizing a local WRL or would like information on the local WRL program please write to the National Office. -a items checkcd. [ | I enclor $-for I cnclosc S-contribution lo the l{RL. [ ] a dozen efforts to organize local WRL's going on around the country. These are what we could call embryo WRL's and when they reach the stage of being able to organize and work outside the WRL -E ; Name I I I I I I Addrcss zip -i March 7, L972 to: from: subject: A11 Office Branch Supenrisors, Reviewers, fnterviewers, Assistant Chief, Office and lSRt s Branch War Crime Deductions advised that several taxpayers, protesting the War in Vietnam, have filed their incoue tax returns showing a deduction captioned, 'rWar Crime Deductlonrr. Some of these returns have been processed through Servlce Center as Matheoatical Errors and TDAts have been issued. fn response to the TDAts, some of these ta:payers We have been are filins Forrtrs 1040X while others are protesting the assessnent on the grounds that there was no Mathernatical Eror and, therefore, the assessment is inyalid. If you encounter ary ta:cpay€rs or process ar5r &ssessments which fa11 lnto the above category, please advlse me irrmediately since the Department of Justice is curently studying the validity of all such assessulents. ucca*ffiri -ZZ*4* sanu6i1. editorrs note: TDA--faxpayerrs Delinquent Account Internal Revenue Service