THE COLLEGE NEWS Friday, November 18, 1966 Faculty Members Reveal Plans For Lame Duck Experimentation by Cookie Poplin Once again Bryn Mawr professors assert their ndividualism and independence. Their responses to ; the ‘‘lame duck’? session -- that last, week of school in between Christmas vacation and exams -- : were as varied as their personalities and their Page Two THE COLLEGE NEWS Subscription $3.75 — Mailing price $5.00 — Subscriptions may begin at any time Post Office, under Post Entered as second class matter at the Bryn Mawr, Pa. the Act of March 3, 1879. Application for re-entry at the Bryn Mawr, Pa. Office filed October Ist, 1963, Second Class Postage paid at Bryn Mawr, Pa. FOUNDED IN 1914 Published weekly during the College Year except during Thanks-~- giving, Christmas and Easter holidays, and during examination weeks in the interest of Bryn Mawr College at the R.K. Printing Company, Inc., Bryn Mawr, Pa., and Bryn Mawr College. The College News is fully protected by copyright. Nothing that appears in Mr. Connor would like to use that last week for professors in the department to explain to biology students the research that they themselves have been doing in their special fields; The chairman of the Philosophy Department, Mr. it may be reprinted wholly or in part without permission of the Editor-in-Chief. EDITORIAL BOARD EditoreineChief.....e eee a oe ere% MANN GING RONNGls 66s 66a ert 0 eee kee iss cee eee A ener yr rire rer i area Membereat-Large ... -Nanette Holben ’68 « «+e eKit Bakke 68 Robin Johnson ’68 « -Kathy Murphey ’69 Make-up Editor. eeeees eee eee ccc e ences ee cee ee sCoOkie Poplin '69 Contributing Editors ........2.+.+++++.+Pam Barald ’67, Emily McDermott '68 Business Manager...... Vy ew era Wh ee ere we es Ge ae et - Fern Hunt '69 Subscription Manager ......; Veer Ceas ts bea wae Mary Ann Spreigel ’68 Advertising Manager. ...eesveesesecsvees ¢eeeeeeee Diane Ostheim '69 Photographer... cccccseitcves ° « Marian Scheuer ’70 kay to Sion: ‘Outs The Constitutional Revision Committee for the Self-Government Association will probably. be taking up the matter of Bryn Mawr’s sign-out system; we know the topic has already been under discus- sion among members of the group. The new Erdman system, which involves. discarding of sign-out cards upon return and informing the hall’ president of late minutes, is a noteworthy experiment which lays _more-stress-on the individual's responsibility to the honor sys- tem, and we encourage all dormitories to try it out, there being no regulations in the present constitution as to sign-out systemsthem- selves, But as the constitution comes up for review, it is time to question the regulations that do exist, especially in terms of curfews. We approach the subject after reading the newspaper of Muhlenberg College, where upperclassmen have no curfews and enter the dorm with a key. Granted the system exists at other colleges, such as Radcliffe, but we cite Muhlenberg because its Women’s Council sent a questionnaire to parents to ask if they would object to a key system, and 87.6 per cent were in favor of the program, If the key system were used at Bryn Mawr, the privilege should go to all undergraduates, not only to juniors and seniors. We suggest that such a system is perfectly feasible here, operating as follows: Every student would not possess a key; rather, she would sign one out if she planned not to come back before 2:00 a.m. and would sign it in when she returned. There should still be a 2:00 a.m. sign-out, with no keys needed up until that time and student doorkeepers on the job until that hour. If a girl planned to be out past 2:00, she should sign out until 6:30 a.m., at which time the dorms would open. If she planned to be out later than 6:30 a.m., she should sign out in the overnight book. There should be no stipulations as to where or where not the 6:30 a.m. sign-out could be used. The main objection to the system is that Bryn Mawr girls have no locks on their. room doors, and if keys to the dorm were lost or dupli- cated, it could be dangerous., The only answer is that the respon- sibility for the keys rests with the students, and loss or misuse of them would not be treated lightly. We propose that the Constitutional Revision Committee poll the campus, as well as send’ out questionnaires to parents, And we invite parent subscribers to submit their reactions to the NEWS if they feel violently pro or con. In conclusion, we add that the system we propose would be an even greater expression of the integrity of Self-Government at Bryn Mawr. The Undergrad Affair The NEWS? stand on the so-called abolition of Undergrad has been widely misinterpreted. Our point has been all dlong not to abolish Undergrad, but rather to de-emphasize and decrease its status. The _ Executive Board itself admits that Undergrad is a ‘‘catch-all or- ganization.’? We simply do not think a ‘‘catch-all organization’? de- serves to be on the same plane as Self-Gov, a body which is not only unique in function, but which represents the social and academic integrity of the whole Bryn Mawr community, Undergrad mistakenly seems to symbolize Bryn Mawr in many cases where instead it should be Self-Gov. The letter from the heads of the Big Six states that Undergrad has not hindered any one of them, Yet we think the example of Alliance’s calendar proposal clearly illustrates how Undergrad, because of its position ‘‘over’’ the Big Six, slows procedure and generally bogs things down. Alliance wrote a proposal several weeks ago onthe method of select- ing the college calendar. It intended to submit it to Curriculum Com- mittee, in whose jurisdiction the matter falls, Instead of being able to do this directly, Alliance had to submit it to Undergrad (on one Mon- day night), Then Undergrad gave it to Curriculum Committee, who expanded it and took it back to Undergrad (the next Monday night), But it was not brought up at that meeting, but at the succeeding one (the next Monday night). It was then approved and the next day it was sub- ‘mitted to Mrs. Marshall, This process took over three weeks when it should not have taken “ much over three days. This is what we mean when we say Undergrad bogs things down. Undergrad is now in the process of revising its Constitution. It will be voted on by Legislature sometime in 1967. Unfortunately, it is not considering the reduction in status that we advocate, but rather the reduction of NSA’s status on campus, which we most strongly do NOT advocate. Therefore we ask that Amendment 9, which adds ‘‘if she is so needed’? to ‘‘The Vice President shall serve as NSA Co- ordinator’? be defeated. This campus would greatly benefit from closer ties with the National Students? Association, and we do not see any reasons a —. it to the asandeervcie, 38 the 08 whe aio needed’? ‘implies. ~~ ~ On the other hand, ~we- are” wienied to see othe woutis abeintica-er reality which is manifested in the changing of the ‘‘Tri-College Standing Committee” to the ‘