Page Six SONI NG TS ERT TOE YT 7A LORE A Sales een CaO UR a RS NR THE HAVERFORD NEWS - THE COLLEGE NEWS Friday, May 6, Lh Less Administration for More Cooperation Martin Oppenheimer has taught at both Bryn Mawr and Haverford. He argues for the estab- lishment of a democratic education beginning in the operation of the classroom itself. His ideas include radical changes in ‘“‘elite women’s colleges.’ ) Beyond the trite and the obvious comes the contro- versial; so that ifI say Ihave had two great years at Hav~ erford and Bryn Mawr and have the warmest respect and regard for the students at both institutions, that is trite, though true, And if I add that students at both institutions are being cheated to some extent in their education, that is obvious -- for where is it-not so? — For me there has always been a contradiction between declarations of. the value of democratic education on the one hand, and the autocracy of most classroom situations on the other. My classroom isa contradiction as much as any (note: I say MY, not OUR, which would be more proper). Last summer, in an Institute for public school teachers of ‘‘culturally disadvantaged children’’ which I helped to staff, I was exposed for the first time to some ideas which go under the heading of ‘‘student-centered teaching.’’? This is a relatively non-directed system in which the teacher acts primarily as a resource, and in which students have to become fully involved in planning the direction and content of the course. For the first time I sensed that the contradiction wasn’t necessary. For the - pu of teaching across cultural lines such a system is ind sable, as those with experience in the Southern Freedom Schools know; it is participatory democracy in * the classroom. I believe this system to be just promis- ing at the college level, though I can’t go into this in the space provided here, Open-Ended Education But such a system assumes a certain kind of goal for education: not primarily the learning of techniques or skills with which to earn a living (including earning the grades to get to graduate school), which canbest be done in a barracks; nor the acquisition of what Veblen once called ‘‘substantially useless information’’ serving as an index to conspicuous consumption and hence status among our elites, but rather learning about one’s self, one’s relationships to others, and to the world around, and what (if anything) to do aboutit, Itassumes that education is open-ended, which is what I mean by eae education. \ This brings me to another point, the unfortunately con- tinuing inferior status of women in our society. The women’s colleges were set up originally for reasons not very different from Negro colleges: since women coyld not enter the men’s schools, it was thought that separ- ation might lean eventually to equality. In different ways, neither the Negro colleges nor the women’s colleges have succeeded in attaining equality, for separation is in- herently unequal, as was pointed out by the Supreme Court in 1954, Matria rchial Bureaucracy The women’s colleges, precisely because of their separation, suffer from a culture lag which finds them continuing to train young ladies to be indices of their fu- ture husband’s status, a practice fostered by their cloist- ered, classics-bound existences, Thus the paradox which finas . matriarchies founded on the proposition of equal rights for women blocking real equality of educa- tion by refusing to integrate--understandable, alas, for . matriarchs tend consciously or unconsciously to per- ceive males intruding into their domain as threatening in various ways. The matriarchal bureaucracy and its relationship~ to. the inferiority complex is a social- psychologically neglected subject to date, but it can per- haps be suggested that true equality can be attained only by true integration. The elite colleges generally continue a segregated existence. Not only are many segregated sexually, absurd in trying to educate for the reality of today, but Theatre, Music Group Interaction Aims for Enrichment in the Arts Lynne Meadow, President of the Bryn Mawr Arts Council, reviews the current extent of coordination in artistic endeavors, which aim for cultural en- richment. The artistic activities that occur on the Bryn Mawr and Haverford campuses have become increasingly more coordinated in the past years. Progressing from a core of groups that were established as bi-college activities, we now enjoy combined participation in cultural traditions: formerly restricted to one campus, The joint efforts that have produced more successful events in- dicates the growing desire to expand and combine artistic opportunities, There would seem to be two major reasons for this increased coordination, Bi-college cultural activities provide a healthy way of meeting members of each campus, Instead of limiting social events to mixers, students can now feel free to meet people on a basis of mutual interest, The atmosphere of working, for instance, on a College Theater production is certainly conducive to mixing and is much less tense than being shipped over to Haverford for a mixer. The Bryn Mawr-Haverford College Theatre, Orchestra and Renaissance Choir were among the groups originally established as co-ed activities, Stemming from these are events such as Haverford Class Night, Bryn Mawr Arts Night, and Dance Concert, all of which, were not originally designated bi-college activities, Casting Bryn Mawr girls in this year’s Class Night not only made rehearsals more enjoyable but also seemed to eliminate much of the off-color humor often characteristic of these plays, Bryn Mawr has made equal use of Haverford talent for its traditional activities, Not only did Haver- ford students play in the band for Junior Show but many ‘¢male’’ technicians were on hand to help the freshmen with their show in February. The Bryn Mawr Dance Concert now includes a sub- stantial and talented number of Haverford dancers, en Ps This coordination incrgases attendance to a worth- while presentation and also provides a fine outlet for Haverford students who have no formal dance club of their own, The Bryn Mawr Arts Night is also combined with the creativity of both schools and encourages ex- perimental presentations in an unlimited realm. Arts Night, Class Night, Dance Club, and WHRC are activities officially belonging to one or the other school, Yet there is a reciprocal agreement that seems to invite bi-college participation and attendance. Each school retains its individual clubs and still interaction is com- fortable and welcome, The combined College Calendar certainly indicates the interest in knowing about the other campus’ events, and why not? We each have artistic facilities and we should feel free to take advantage of all available opportunities, Perhaps a more coordinated Art Series is next on a list of possible improvements, Lynne Meadow President of Arts Council Bryn Mawr College “*The women's colleges, precisely because of their separation, suffer from a culture lag which finds them continuing to train young ladies to be indices of their future husbands’ status, a practice fostered by their cloistered, classics-bound existences.” they are segregated from their surrounding communities (the ‘‘real world’’), also contributing to an artificial existence which impedes understanding. This often in- cludes an appalling unawareness of the lives andfortunes of even those members of the community who work on campus. They continue as well to be segregated racially and class-wise (though less so than formerly), for the occasional summer institutes and ‘‘prep’”? programs undertaken for their Southern brethren are tokenism only and are entirely inadequate to the needs. of. both the ‘¢other’? populations, and students who presently fill the elite schools. ‘Community of Scholars’ I think we must come to grips with the fact that if the liberal arts college has a special job todo educationally, this job cannot be done while competing with the multi- versity for laurels that go. to the American Celebration, Our job is presumably the pursuit of truth, and not the sale of it--the challenge of our society, not its accept- ance. That kind of job requires the creation of what Paul Goodman calls ‘‘The Community of Scholars,”? which means in part the extension of decision-making to all the members thereof--one person, one vote, as in Neill’s SUMMERHILL, (For such a community, Haverford’s smaller size and Quaker tradition in decision-making processes are: advantages which could be built upon.) It means (partly to save money) more cooperation (in- cluding co-ops) and less administration, more use of the neighboring community as a classroom (especially in the social sciences) and less building. It means having all the staff and students really involved with each other and with life, and fewer teachers whose only life ex- perience has been cloistered academe. It means experi- mentation and getting away from doing things in a par- ticular way just because they work administratively (including - class ‘‘periods,’”” grades, and taking exams for a grade). Above all it means if you believe in demo- cratic education you start behaving that way, starting right in the classroom with decisions about how that classroom is going to operate. Martin Oppenheimer Lecturer in Sociology Bryn Mawr College Wanted: More Coeducation Joan Cavallaro, President of the Curriculum Committee at Bryn Mawr, points out differ- ences in orientation between departments at Bryn Mawr and Haverford, and views the possibility of Bryn Mawr students’ being permitted to major at Haverford. Haverford and Bryn Mawr have been working towards more and better academic coordination over the past years. An increasing number of students from each college are taking courses at the other school each year, Our Economics Departments are coordinated; the Political Science course offerings of the two colleges are in many instances complementary; alternating courses in the Humanities are often arranged with the other college in mind, so that a course not offered one year at one school may be supplemented by a course given that year at the other. The mess-up of this year’s college calanders showed the importance of bi-college cooperation. i In short, it is becoming more and more obvious that both colleges have only to gain by coordinating their facilities more closely and by working towards mutual academic goals. How else, one is often asked, can small colleges keep up with the larger and co-ed universities. Indeed, as early as 1904 M.Carey Thomas, the first Dean and second President of Bryn Mawr, ‘foresaw a time when the need for them (women’s colleges) would pass, when women would gain more than they would lose by entering the more fully endowed great universities ...’? (CAREY THOMAS OF BRYN MAWR, by Edith Finch, p. 280.) . The topic of bi-college coordination being fully upon us, then, the two questions which must be raised and thoroughly discussed this year and in the coming years are: in what areas and by what methodscan the Curricu- lum representatives of both schools enhance the bi- college intellectual community? Just how much academic coordination is desirable? The first question, which has already been broached in get-togethers of the Haverford student representa- tives to the Educational Policy Committee and the Academic Flexibility Committee with members of the Bryn Mawr Curriculum Committee, begins with the cliche problem of ‘‘communication.”? Better communi- cation on all fronts: Committee-student, student- committee, committee-committee, committee-faculty, faculty-committee, historical-comical-pastoral. Both groups acknowledged that students could take more initiative in making known to all undergraduates the possibilities for petitioning for a change in academic requirements, the course offerings at the siblingcollege, . and so forth. With better understanding of the particular emphasis of corresponding departments and content and arrangement of courses, students could make a more educated guess in choosing their coursework. More important, bi-college rather than separate dis- cussion of such ripening topics as pass-fail courses can help set the stage for the development of mutual academic goals and attitudes towards education. The most promising field for cooperation in intellectual outlook lies in the possible changes of the future, and henceforth any major innovations contemplated by one sphool should be considered in the light of both colleges, As to the second question, both colleges should address the larger. question of how much the educational facil- ities of the colleges should be combined in order to best serve the interests of students and faculty, M. Carey Thomas challenged in 1920: “‘The very first step (that "| university women should now take) seems to me to be the demand for unqualified, true, out and out co-education, Only by having the schools and universities co-educational can we ensure the girls S the world necekying thoroughly “good eqaestens’ a9 jute Cavaliers ais President of Curriculum Committee Bryn Mawr Co llege