*,

THE COLLEGE NEWS :

 
 

Page 3

 

* usual.

-Freshinen,

.
ee

 

 

Sar AP a4 et ae

ATHLETICS: once

 

“Seasnd Varsity Game

Monday afternoon the. second Var-
sity defeated the Merion Club seconds,
10-3. Because of Merion’s weakness
the game was lacking in interest.

Gerhard took the scoring honors,
making six of the ten oy Although
she made so many goals, her “shooting
was not as hard as usual, and she
often went into the goal.with the ball.
On the whole her playing was good,
and she stayed in position more than
. Boyd and Waples in their first
game of. the season played extremely
well.

In the first half we, unscored upon,
led by a three-to-nothing score. Dur-
ing the second half the forward line
bombarded the Merion goaler for seven
more goals. In the gathering dusk and
confusion around the Bryn Mawr goal,

Merion was able to push in three

scores.

Second Varsity Merion Seconds
LAC: eee BE OWN oo cde iui Marsh
FAeimMee. i... sisscuss 1 eae Pierpont
GOPHGtd:... jis. Caer Gees ere ener Foster
Wales 5.cc50s 1 REGS Coenen Thayer
DOO fe iccsisicavcs Li Woisceainatn White
ME a, Ry aE Gardner
CSB rietvinveveveevene A «NS Holman
PAST inen.....s.5...5 Ee ea Maxwell
Hishop.. 1s ads beta teres Flannery
LE Gn IS oe Gummere
TON ce an Gre aii Dolan

Score: Merion—Thayer, 2; Foster, 1.
Bryn Mawr—Gerhard, 6; Boyd, 2;
Hellmer, 1; Waples, 1.

 

On the second field at the same time
as the Second Varsity game, the Jun-
ior.and the Freshman ‘second teams

_ played to a scoreless tie.

1932 1934
Alexanderson........ R. W......4.... Silyder
BOG as | ON eRe Meneely
PUGIAON cicccics cas Co. Re as “Hurd
1s) wera. 371 0 [0 [4 | ORR RRRR boy ms CEU, AON Daniels
WV Siete... ie Stevenson
TE NV OOS. ii ci the as Hannan

(Hunter)

BOG eka Pleasanton
“He Carpenter
Hardenberg Moa Le Gribbel
Brows isvccZu i lee ae MacKenzie
PLUM EL ciate nesccsess ee P. Totten

(J. Woods)

Referee: Miss Seeley. Time:~ 25-
mintite ‘halves. Score: 0-0.

 

Class Games,’ First Teams

On Thursday. afternoon the class

‘hockey games were begun with the

Juniors defeating the Seniors, 3-0, and
the Freshmen beating the Sophomores,
3-1.

The Seniors with a complete team
gave_the Juniors some good opposi-
tion and might have made an even bet-
ter showing if the-backfield had. gotten
going. Tatnall playing-at centre half
prevented the light blues from scoring
more often.

cu aes 1932
Benheim:, 055. RW Sanborn
MOOTE. ci a | IS Lega rie i Shaw
TOMAR, his. eh a nis
Wales. aisiccnnis | Seed nea ne Moore
EUPHGE ccc socseu he es cree: Ralston
Mindley. oi. Geek, sR Be; Stonington
Tathall Gaus CH. Woodward
Doak ci. cine: PEyy & Pea Reinhardt
Frothingham..........R. Paes, Watts
Bae?scccdeneonvas 1 AE ee McCully
Thomas.23 cr be0.8 Re ci i ceaseiiedans Gill

Referee: Migs Grant, Time: 25-
minute, halyes.- Score: 1932—Crane, 2;
Ralston, 1.

The Sophomore- Peeters contest

was characterized by messy playing.
With wet grounds everybody sat down
at least three times. At the start, the
Freshmen made a vicious attack on
the goal. Collier, in preventing Ger-
hard, the hard-hitting Freshman left

inner, from getting a free shot at goal,

met up with Gerhard’s stick and got a
slit in her lower lip, thus preventing
her from playing in the Varsity game
Saturday. The Sophomores. showing
a great lack of co-ordination were ex-
tremely slow. On, the other hand the
despite the bad footing,
were faster than usual and had a great

deal better team work. “Remington

made the only. goal for the reds in
their one good attack by trying to
knock out Jones. . However, her at-
tempt was unsuccessful, for Jones re-
mained. impregnable for the rest of the
game. Gerhard and Smith led the
Dee: ne wren backed up by le

 

 

Sal aah

be better when back at wing.

Bioim. ©. _ Merion
J. 1 Ese sean RoW ccs Marsh
Longacre.:.... wR. I.....,.M. Flannery
ISS: EE ER AOS A Foster
Eee bite Canny ee ne Gar Tuttle
Sanborn. «..... L. W. . Forstall
WHOM Roe ee Daly
Collies ce... Townsend
Harriman..........<.:.. ie | Maxwell
aA... kk F.., Peres
Rothermel. oe Holman
PUNTER dics ec sss es Gonnery
Referees: Miss Morgan, Mi&s Grant.
Time: 30-minute halves. Score: B.
M.-C.—Longacre, Moore, Allen; Mer-

Foster.

Rothermel and Bishop.

1933 1934 |
WY TING oti sccivons es |e ', SURI Carter
Lonwatre.. oc: | sree CR Ree Gerhard
Remington............ Se Pgssivctinnt Smith
PIO MOE ices ss Dea ak Nichols
Torrance...:..:......... L. W........... Polachek
ATOM oi i. ce BN sovii baad Bowie
COMBE ists SHS: Haines Jarret

(Collins) ;
kt RTE, 1: ee cua Miles
PUN: oiiccceissdoc ons Re Peis Bishop

(Grassi)
Bowditch.............. dae Bisse Rothermel
WP MOMSOM 3.650650 05casaie. RE vinciiae Jones

Referee: Miss Seeley. Time: 25-
minute halves. Score: 1934—Gerhard,

2; Smith, 1. 1933—Remington, 1.

 

Merion Cricket Club

r)

 

CONTINUED FROM yPAGE i

was Miss Townsend at centre half.
She played all over the field, stopping
almost everything and -practically pre-
vented Totten from having a look at
the ball. Despite Miss Townsend’s
opposition, however; Totten did play
a good game and she will undoubtedly

ion—Tuttle,

 

104 Students._Enrolled ,
in Graduate School

CONTINUED FROM PAGE 1

 

tive estimate of ,the students whose inten-
tion it-is to work for the higher degrees,
particularly in the case of the doctorate,
for often two or more years of study are
completed before the candidate files a
formal application.

* The graduateysttident is d migrant.
Our own foreign students are one proof
of this. The large number of American
institutions represented here is a second.
Still another is the group of students
from this Graduate School sent out each
year for study abroad. Many- students
who have been here for a year or more
and will come back for their doctor’s
degree go to other institutions in this
country or abroad for: a broadening of
their experience. We in turn furnish the
years of variety to. another. group of
students who are candidates for the doc-
torate in other places. In fact, it is one
of my firmest convictions that it ought
‘tobe only over the dead body of any
Dean that.a candidate could be admitted
to the Ph.D. degree whose academic ex-
perience was. limited to one place.

From an- international point_of view
this steady migration of students would
seem a factor of inestimable impor-
tance in furthering mutual understand-
ings. The American graduate student
has been on the march for years, but
until recently the’ American under-
graduate has been kept at home. The
movement for the “Junior Year in
France, to’ be extended in the. near
future to other countries, is changing
that. I see as a possible by-product of
that movement the. breaking down of
some of the ‘barriers that have so
stupidly been allowed to grow up-in
this country between graduate and un-
dergraduate.

The European experience in the Jun-
ior Year gives. many American under-
graduates their first contact with stu-
dents who work on their own as do
European university stidents. If a
taste for independent work is thereby
developed the signals may well be set
for graduate study as the logical next
step after the A. B. degree.

~]~-have been -interested—in- seeing
here at Bryn Mawr in the group of
reraduate students in French that have
collected around Professor- Hazard. a
first crop from the Junior Year in
France: -three students who were sent
over by their respective colleges—three
different ones—before Bryn Mawr had
adopted the plan.

Defeated by Varsity].

in its various Arnerican’ manifesta-
tions, has also awakened Juniors and
Seniors, all over the country, new
kind of approach to study whic
them oftefi- very close to the sort of
work carried on in Graduate Schools.
I_ think that no’ undergraduate -of to-
day could grow up with all the miscon-
ceptions that were mine .concerning
graduate study. No _one had ever
thought to describe to me- Fie work for
the Ph. D. degree in any way as I see
it now: the pursuit of the one subject
you are most interested in pursuing.
On the contrary, when I left college I

S| still thought that the Ph. D. degree re-

quired universal knowledge with the
implication that «there were minds
capable* of achieving such: knowledge:
I still believed that at a doctor’s oral
any member of the faculty was author-
ized to ask the candidate any question
on.any subject under the sun. Need-
less to say, I left college with no
thought of a Ph. D. degree in my own
future.

Tithes have changed.” You ate much
more mature intellectually as- Seniors
than my generation was, There is no
reason for the students of undergrad-
uate colleges and the students of grad-
uate -schools of today not to recognize,
as younger and older students do in
European universities, that they belong
to one coherent whole and are all going
about the same business.

 

In the New Bookroom

 

CONTINCED FROM PAGE 2

The
made a little

may be barren in their rewards.
younger generation
ruthless, too grasping in trying to
achieve happiness, but even, in this
hurried seeking there are elements of

is

courage and common sense; Jane sees |

it and admits that “it is not a clearcut

brings |

ee

issue between the apes and the angels.”
The problem of her own approaching
ld age she Aad faced at the. death of
af father? When-atlast she ¥aw “eyetol”
eye with him-and_realized.that-she-too
had become a spectator.”” When finally
Cicily and Albert and Belle were
n° their way to their own sort of
happiness,
facing an immoréality th pe xprove
in: the end only one more social ad-
venture. She would prefer oblivion.”

drawn from the point of view of one
who prefers Jane. Much wisdom and
clarity are shown in the development
of Jane herself and her various friends,
who cannot escape from themselves as
they were in youth. The older genera-
tion is wisely. depicted objectively, by
‘some one younger who cannot see the
lives of her parents as a continuous
whole. “They had always seemed so
staid, so settled, so more than middle-
aged.” In the background is the steady
and amazing growth of Chicago to a
powerful city, which sets a pace for
the generations who live in it. A sort
of reverence is evident in Mrs. Barnes’
treatment of Bryn Mawr and especially
in her appreciation of ~M. “Carey
“Thomas, seen through” Jane’s eyes.
Marion Park enters the pages as Jane’s
friend, a shadowy figure whose ac-
complishments are prophesied in orac-
ular fashion by Jane’s father:

-The maturity reflected in the book
is, in many places, somewhat disap-
pointing, a little wistful. There is an
‘inevitable facing of ‘the problems of
compromise and readjustmient. It is in
the grace with which Jane makes these
readjustments and faces these difficul-
ties that the strength and truth of the
book lie, and it is the gracelessness of
the younger generation in their living
which emphasizes this quality.

 

Be he,

“Jane left a_ little. weary,

The characters are. sympathetically

 

M. Hazard Discusses

 

Revolinionary Bo “Poetry Stresses
Tmagery and Sound at

Logic’ 8 Expense. *

 

POETS END IN « MISERY

 

La Poesie Francaise entre 1815 ‘et 1914”
with a discussion of Verlaine and Rim-

baud. Considering first'the case of Ver;

laine, M. Hazard pointed out that he
was raised in a well-to-do bourgeois fam-
ily of Metz. ‘As a youth he followed the
usual classical course of study. . After
having studied law at Paris he entered
the offices of an insurance company and
in 1864 he acquired a sinecyte in the
municipal offices of Paris. Because he
had no inclination for.the work, he was
an indolent employee... He made the ac-
quaintance of Coppee, Prudhomme, “and
other Parnassians, and was influenced
for a time by their theory of impassibility
and art for art’s sake.. In 1866 he made
his debut with the Poemes Saturniens
which are but echoes of Leconte de Lisle
and Baudelaire. He was still, however,
apprentice drawing his inspiration
from every one with whom he came into
contact, even the Romantics; neverthe-
less, his personality becomes evident.
With the Fetes Galantes in 1869 he cap-
tures the tender grace of the eighteenth
century. To this he had added his dis-
tress and his heart, both sensual and
platonic. He was to be a poet, at one
and the same time bohemian and _ bour-
geois. This bourgeois side is exempli-
fied in his Bonne Chanson (1870) which

an

CONTINUED ON PAGE 6

 

 

 

 

as a

 

a

 

 

 

 

 

 

g Honours ‘work: for ‘the A.

 

    
 

of the
Luden's

True, 7

; like and

Luden's

COUG

 

making faces.
just to be

CIGARETTE
COUGH

can't enjoy her cigarette because

cigarette cough.

If someone would only give her a_

beauty-
C-O-U-

have tender throats. Yet— you can
smoke what you like and when you

every so often after smoking.

the mouth, soothes the throat and
relieves_
_in 10 seconds. _ .

LUDEN’S

smoker s
throat

She isn’t

funny,

it’s: that

hacking, annoying, after-

for Quick Relief from that
killing, face-disfiguring
G-H-I-N-GI

out of every 10 women

enjoy it; bytaking a Luden’s

Menthol Action refreshes

that “cigaretty” cough —

H DROPS

|. Verlaine, and. Rimbaud

M. Hazard“continued his lectures on

‘contains charming~ poems reminiscent of ———

 

j