Choosing the Class Animal With spring-time came one of the last Freshman problems, the question of the class animal and of the class seal. Finally a committee was chosen; that is, the class of 1906 again found opportunity of watching other people work, a sight they peculiarly appreciate, books which they boasted contained that rare article, registration cards pure of initials. Their sufferings were great; one unfortunate was haunted in dreams by a queer creature called a “‘Gules-Rampant,” while another found herself murmuring in place of Chaucer’s Metre Scheme—‘A bull dog, azure, turgescent on a field vert,”’ Finally they felt prepared to report and a class meeting was called. I remember it vividly still; it was among the most exciting I ever attended, for it was the scene of one of our time-honored scraps. Ethel de Koven, as Chairman, read out the list of animals from which we were to choose. Noah, entering the ark, could not have headed a more motley collection. There was a lion, a tiger, a gryphon, a bull, a bull-dog, and heaven knows what else, each with an appropriate motto. Instantly, the wildest confusion arose. Jessie Thomas,—on the principle of like to like, no doubt—pleaded unceasingly for the bull- dog, while Smithy’s affections were centered on the bull; why, no one could guess, as it only connoted Durham Plug Tobacco to our minds. Ever and anon Gladys Chandler would put in a timid word for the lion, king of beasts, only to be drowned out by Smithy calling for “A fair field and no favor”; Mary’s gavel pounded unceasingly, with little effect until our lung power and our legs gave out simultaneously. F inally we sat quiet, despair on every face, lightened only by malignant glances at the committee, who were of singularly retiring natures that afternoon. | Then suddenly Ethel Bullock arose, her eyes shining with inspiration; we leaned forward eagerly to hear her cry in ringing tones, ‘‘ Why don’t we have a stork?” And, in the riotous laughter that followed, we could hear Alice Lauterbach attempting desperately to enlighten the mystified Ethel. At last some one— or was it among the committee’s collection of pleasant beasts?—suggested the crab and its motto, and after some fierce altercation it was elected to rule over the destiny of Nineteen- Six. Unable to have the chair appoint any more committees, we adjourned, to scrap all the way home on the merits of the crab. LouisE NETTERVILLE CRUICE. 25